Comparative analysis of the functions of judicial and notary bodies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.295398

Keywords:

notary, judicial bodies, protection of civil law and interest, court competence, notary development

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the functions of judicial bodies and notary bodies was carried out through a constructive analysis of norms of civil legislation, unexplored aspects of these functions were identified. Both general theoretical and special methods became the methodological basis of the research. The method of comparative analysis made it possible to determine the common and distinctive features of the functions of the court and the notary in civil legal relations. The dialectical method made it possible to find out which of the functions can be transferred from the competence of one body to another. It has been clarified what role both courts and notaries play in regulating civil legal relations. Forms of protection of civil rights and interests by both notary and judicial bodies were studied. It has been established that the implementation of an executive inscription on a debt document by a notary is not the only form of protection of civil rights and interests of individuals and legal entities by a notary. It has been determined that the role of the court in civil legal relations is not limited to the protection of the violated right or interest, in particular, when deciding the issue of limiting the civil capacity of a person or recognizing him/her as incapable, establishing guardianship and care by the court. It is proposed to introduce a new institution of civil law regarding the exercise by an individual of an order for guardianship or care in the event of his/her future incapacity or limitation in legal capacity, as well as to expand the limits of the exercise of civil rights by individuals and to grant such powers to the notary through the certification of a certain type of contract or order, in order to reduce the burden to the judicial system in cases where there is no legal dispute. It has been established that both judicial bodies and notary bodies have a common subject of regulation in civil legal relations, while it is noted that judicial bodies have an influence on the notary in the context of the possibility of invalidating transactions that were notarized

Author Biography

Lina Kyianytsia, V. M. Koretsky Institute of State and Law

Postgraduate Student

References

  1. Zavalnyi, M. V. (2018). Pravookhoronna funktsiia notariatu. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava, 4 (1), 40–43. Available at: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/77d1cd7c-434b-4625-8ba0-c567817cfd13/content
  2. Vasylyk, Y. (2020). Interaction of subjects of notarial activity with state and non-state bodies. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management, 1 (3), 136–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.51647/kelm.2020.3.1.23
  3. Barankova, V. V. (2018). Appealing against notarial actions or denial of its commission. notarialnykh dii abo vidmovy u yikh vchynenni. Pravo i derzhavne upravlinnia, 1 (2 (31)), 49–56. Available at: http://pdu-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/2_2018/tom_1/11.pdf
  4. Salai, M. (2022). Comparative aspects of collection of undisputed debt in notary and judicial procedures. Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs Kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav, 4 (119), 419–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2022-4-419-427
  5. Marguénaud, J.-P., Dauchez, C. N., Dauchez, B. (2018). The notary, ”out-of-court magistrate” with regard to the European judge of Human Rights. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-01878216/document
  6. Fursa, S. Ya. (Ed.) (2012). Teoriia notarialnoho protsesu. Kyiv: Alerta; Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 920.
  7. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2003). Kodeks Ukrainy No. 435-IV. 16.01.2003. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
  8. Pro notariat (1993). Zakon Ukrainy No. 3425-XII. 02.09.1993. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3425-12#Text
  9. Nesterchuk, L. P. (2021). Zahalne poniattia ta vyznachennia funktsii sudiv zahalnoi yurysdyktsii. Aktualni problemy polityky, 43, 226–233. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11300/1492
  10. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy (1996). Zakon Ukrainy No. 254k/96-VR. 28.06.1996. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
  11. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2021). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-report-data-2018-cnue/1680a4d1ec

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Kyianytsia, L. (2023). Comparative analysis of the functions of judicial and notary bodies. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4(26), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.295398

Issue

No. 4(26) (2023)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Lina Kyianytsia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.