European experience in counteracting disinformation influences

Authors

  • Alla Kovalchuk Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Bogdana Cherniavska National Academy of Management; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-7483

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2024.309074

Keywords:

security, threats, disinformation, national/state security, information security, information and communication technologies, information-psychological influences, information warfare

Abstract

Information-psychological influences, attacks, and operations do not have a physical manifestation but generate destabilizing internal and external processes within a state. These processes cause aggression, anxiety, and dissatisfaction among the population, potentially leading to open physical conflict. The use of the Internet enables extremist organizations to access mass media, spreading propaganda, informing about their goals, tasks, measures, and forms of support. The authors emphasize the significant impact of modern information and communication technologies on increasing threats to political stability and the security of any state. The aim of this paper is to highlight foreign experiences regarding organizational and legal measures that prevent the spread of disinformation, aimed at inciting hostility and hatred within a state. The study draws on experiences from large-scale protest actions, organized and coordinated through social networks on the Internet. The authors note that blogs, social networks, electronic maps, and video hosting sites are currently used without restrictions for political destabilization. Social networks enable immediate support from like-minded individuals and the publication of extremist materials, which contribute to the escalation of socio-political, ethnic, and interfaith conflicts. The main research methods are comparative analysis, statistical method, historical method, structural-functional method of cognition. Having studied the periods of formation of the system for countering the spread of disinformation in the EU, the authors concluded that the work on countering the spread of disinformation is conducted comprehensively and systematically and is constantly being improved in accordance with the challenges. In the EU countries, not only the practice of combating disinformation has been developed, but also an array of normative legal acts has been adopted to prevent the spread of disinformation. The European experience demonstrates the importance of a balance between freedom of speech and security measures in the information space. Such a comprehensive and conceptual approach should be the basis for creating a system for countering the spread of disinformation in Ukraine.

Author Biographies

Alla Kovalchuk, Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Juridical Science, Professor

Department of International Law and other Specialized Legal Disciplines

Bogdana Cherniavska, National Academy of Management; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Theory and History of State and Law

Guest Researcher at the Faculty of Law

Department of Criminology

References

  1. Top 10 trends of 2014: 10. The Rapid Spread of Misinformation Online (2014). World Economic Forum.
  2. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Tackling Online Disinformation: a European Approach. COM/2018/236 final (2018). Eur-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0236
  3. McCuen, J. J. (2008). Hybrid Wars. Military Review. Fort Leavenworth: Combined Arms Center. March-April, 107–113. Available at: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20080430_art017.pdf
  4. Polska, K. (2024). Doslidzhennia: Rosiia – holovnyi dezinformator u YeS. Available at: https://www.dw.com/ru/issledovanie-rossia-glavnyj-rasprostranitel-dezinformacii-v-es/a-69089063
  5. Van der Linden, T. (2024). AI: We Need Another Hero. ALTI Amsterdam. Available at: https://alti.amsterdam/ai-we-need-another-hero/
  6. de Hingh, A. E., Lodder, A. R. (2017). Informatieveiligheid: de digitale veerkracht van Nederlandse overheden. Bestuurskunde, 26 (1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.5553/bk/092733872017026001005
  7. The Doppelganger case assessment of Platform Regulation on the EU Disinformation Environment (2024). Riga. Available at: https://stratcomcoe.org/pdfjs/?file=/publications/download/The-Doppelganger-Case-DIGITAL.pdf?zoom=page-fit
  8. Fon Klauzevits, K. (2023). Naivazhlyvishi pryntsypy vedennia viiny. Arii, 384.
  9. Dobber, T., Kruikemeier, S., Helberger, N., Goodman, E. (2023). Shielding citizens? Understanding the impact of political advertisement transparency information. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231157640
  10. Arquilla, J. (2007). Information strategy and warfare: a guide to theory and practice. Available at: https://ocul-yor.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000892449705164&context=U&vid=01OCUL_YOR&lang=enT
  11. The Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation (2022). Available at:https://disinfocode.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-Strengthened-Code-of-Practice-on-Disinformation-2022.pdf
  12. Baines, P., O’Shaughnessy, N., Snow, N. (2020). The SAGE Handbook of Propaganda. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526477170

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

Kovalchuk, A., & Cherniavska, B. (2024). European experience in counteracting disinformation influences. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2 (28), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2024.309074

Issue

Section

Juridical Science