Methodology of regulation of new types of weapons by means of international humanitarian law: emergence and development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2021.247459Keywords:
international humanitarian law, law of The Hague, law of Geneva, new types of weapons, codification of international humanitarian lawAbstract
The purpose of the article is to identify the methodology, used in international humanitarian law for the regulation of new types of weapons. Under the settlement of the objectives of the article, regulation is understood as the establishment of permits, prohibitions and restrictions on the use of this type of weapon in accordance with the basic principles of international humanitarian law.
The article is methodologically based on the works of foreign and Ukrainian researchers, devoted to the problems of the settlement of new weapons systems in international humanitarian law. The empirical basis of the article was formed by international treaties in the field of international humanitarian law and codified customs of this industry, as reflected in the codifications, developed by the International Committee of the Red Cross.
The article establishes that in international humanitarian law there is an obligation for states to assess the compliance of new weapons systems with international humanitarian law. At the same time, this norm has two disadvantages. First, it is too abstract, which allows states to avoid the obligation to assess each time with reference to the fact that a certain type of weapon does not fall under the definition of a new type of weapon. Secondly, international humanitarian law does not contain specific mechanisms to hold violating states accountable.
It is concluded, that it is necessary to revise the current international legal regulation of the obligation to assess new weapons systems in the direction of its concretization and strengthening of responsibility for non-compliance. Corresponding changes can be made to the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 1977, or introduced by adopting a separate protocol.
References
- Trebin, M. P. (2016). P. A. Sorokins Sociology of War. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho», 3 (30), 95–107.
- Dogel, M. (1894). Iuridicheskoe polozhenie lichnosti vo vremia sukhoputnoi voiny. Kombatanty. Kazan, 372.
- Kalskhoven, F. (1999). Ogranicheniia metodov i sredstv vedeniia voiny. Moscow, 232.
- Hrushko, M. V.; Arakelian, M. R. (Ed.) (2020). Pryntsyp lex specialis: vzaiemozviazok mizhnarodnoho prava prav liudyny ta mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho prava. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy. Odesa: Helvetyka, 3, 31–34.
- Senatorova, O. V. (2018). Prava liudyny i zbroini konflikty. Kyiv: FOP Holembovska O. O., 208.
- Dodatkovyi protokol do Zhenevskykh konventsii vid 12 serpnia 1949 roku, shcho stosuietsia zakhystu zhertv mizhnarodnykh zbroinykh konfliktiv (Protokol I) (1977). 08.06.1977. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_199#Text
- Bazov V. P. (2020). Teoriia ta pryntsypy mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho prava. Kyiv, 464.
- Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (1987). 08.06.1977. Commentary of 1987. New weapons. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=F095453E41336B76C12563CD00432AA1
- Deivis, Ya., Foks, Dzh. (Eds.) (2018). SIPRI Yearbook 2017Armaments, Disarmamentand International Security. Kyiv, 568.
- Gasser, Kh. P. (1994). Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. Moscow, 125.
- David, E. (2000). Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov. Moscow: MKKK, 1144.
- Meltser N., Kiuster E. (2020). Mizhnarodne humanitarne pravo: zahalnyi kurs. MKChKh, 398.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ruslan Melykov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.