Peculiarities of discovery of materials during preparatory proceedings under the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine and in the practice of its implementation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2025.326153

Keywords:

preparatory proceedings, criminal procedure, criminal proceedings, pre-trial investigation, court decision, court proceedings, principle of criminal proceedings

Abstract

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of discovery of materials during the preparatory proceedings in the criminal procedure of Ukraine. The author notes that among the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine, which provide for the possibility of familiarization with materials during the preparatory proceedings, there are both those which establish such a possibility not under the procedure of discovery (Article 317 of the CPC of Ukraine) and those with which the legislator associates this possibility precisely in the order of the procedure of discovery (Article 290(11), Article 314(2)(2) of the CPC of Ukraine). The purpose of the study is to clarify the peculiarities of discovery of materials during the preparatory proceedings under the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine and in the practice of its implementation.

Using general scientific and specific scientific methods of cognition, analyzing the provisions of criminal procedure legislation, its application practice and doctrinal sources, the article clarifies the issue of the possibility of opening materials under Article 290 of the CPC of Ukraine during the preparatory proceedings, mentions the issue of opening pre-trial investigation materials during the preparatory proceedings in case of involvement of a new defense counsel in the proceedings after the pre-trial investigation is completed, outlines the issue of peculiarities of opening the investigation materials at the preparatory court hearing.

As a result of the study, the author emphasizes that the actual disclosure of materials within the meaning of Article 290 of the CPC of Ukraine during the preparatory proceedings is rare, although in certain situations it takes place, and is carried out with due regard for Article 290(11) of the CPC of Ukraine. Attention is drawn to the relevance of researchers' proposals regarding the possibility of applying Article 290(11) of the CPC of Ukraine to ensure disclosure of pre-trial investigation materials during the preparatory proceedings in case of engagement of a new defense counsel in the preparatory proceedings, but it is emphasized that Article 290(11) of the CPC of Ukraine is applied by analogy in such cases. The author gives examples of interpretation of the concept of “objective impossibility to get acquainted with the materials”, referred to in Article 314(2)(2) of the CPC of Ukraine

Author Biography

Yuliia Vakoliuk, National University of Ostroh Academy

PhD Student

Educational and Scientific Institute of Law by I. Malynovskyi

References

  1. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (z protokolamy) (Ievropeiska konventsiia z prav liudyny) (1950). Konventsiia Rady Yevropy. 04.11.1950. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
  2. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2012). Kodeks Ukrainy No. 4651-VI. 13.04.2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
  3. Zhovtan, Yu. V. (2023). Separate issues of the application of the provisions of article 290 of the cpc of ukraine in the context of disclosure of criminal proceeding materials by the defense party of the prosecutor. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 5, 493–496. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-5/123
  4. Torbas, O. O., Chebanov, A. V. (2024). Disclosure of materials to another party in accordance with Part 11 of Art. 290 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: an analysis of the practice of the Supreme Court. Prykarpatskyi Yurydychnyi Visnyk, 1, 136–139. https://doi.org/10.32782/pyuv.v1.2024.26
  5. Zeikan, Ya. (2016). Favor defensionis, abo «Spryiannia zakhystu». Chastyna 2. Available at: https://unba.org.ua/publications/print/1010-favor-defensionis-abo-spriyannya-zahistu-chastina-2.html
  6. Basysta, I. V. (2019). Failure to disclose materials of pre-trial investigation to the other party as possible basis for pronouncing data from open procedural documents to be inadmissible evidence in criminal proceeding. Social & Legal Studios, 1 (3), 69–80.
  7. Hura, O. Sudova praktyka VS shchodo vidkryttia dokaziv inshii storoni za st.290 KPK: top 17 keisiv. Available at: https://femida.ua/news/sudova-praktyka-vs-shhodo-vidkryttya-dokaziv-inshij-storoni-za-st-290-kpk-top-17-kejsiv/
  8. Demianova, O. V. (2023). Untimely disclosure of evidence by the prosecution as a threat to the violation of the principle of fairness of the trial. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 7, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-7/2
  9. Pivaty, A., Soo, A. (2019). Access to the Case Materials in Pre-Trial Stages : Critical Questions of Article 7 of Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings. Eucrim – The European Criminal Law Associations’ Forum. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2019-001
  10. Skwarcow, M. (2024). Limits of the Evidence Initiative of the Court of First Instance and the Reliable Evidence Procedure. Ius Novum, 18 (1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/in-2024-0005
  11. Shmyndruk, O. F. (2014). Pidhotovche provadzhennia yak kryminalno-protsesualna katehoriia. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: yurysprudentsiia. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats, 2 (10-2), 159–162.
  12. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu vid 06.12.2018 u spravi No. 521/2542/14-k (2018). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78627821
  13. Ukhvala Vinnytskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 16.06.2022 u spravi No. 676/1887/17-k (2022). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104822035
  14. Ukhvala Kyivskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 09.02.2022 u spravi No. 382/507/19 (2022). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103515490
  15. Ukhvala Poltavskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 06.02.2024 u spravi No. 621/704/18 (2024). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116939490
  16. Hloviuk, I. V. (2015). Podannia storonamy dokaziv u sudovomu rozghliadi: problemni pytannia. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 3, 28–33. Available at: https://vkslaw.knu.ua/images/verstka/3_2015_Gloviuk.pdf
  17. Krushynskyi, S. (2015). Problemy podannia dokaziv na stadii pidhotovchoho provadzhennia v sudi pershoi instantsii. Slovo natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv, 2 (11), 110–118. Available at: http://old.univer.km.ua/doc/kkp/10.pdf
  18. Popeliushko, V. O. (2013). Formuvannia kryminalnoi spravy na stadii sudovoho provadzhennia. Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, 1, 44–49. Available at: https://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/364a81ce-2c94-4e17-8416-0c763a2cffd3/content
  19. Ukhvala Tarashchanskoho miskoho sudu Kyivskoi oblasti vid 20.07.2023 u spravi No. 379/101/23 (2023). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/112316158
  20. Ukhvala Kyivskoho raionnoho sudu mista Poltava vid 01.10.2024 u spravi No. 552/6622/24 (2024). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/121993409

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Vakoliuk, Y. (2024). Peculiarities of discovery of materials during preparatory proceedings under the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine and in the practice of its implementation. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4 (30), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2025.326153

Issue

Section

Juridical Science