Development of approach to anticipatory risk management of the enterprise under uncertainty conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.108595

Keywords:

anticipatory risk management, identification of weak signals, preventive measures, optimization of allowable risks

Abstract

The object of research is a risk management in the enterprise under uncertainty conditions.

In a period of rapid market transformation of risk management is one of the most important tasks for business entities. Problems of reducing the uncertainty of the external environment management, early diagnosis of risky situations, the adoption of adequate solutions to minimize the impact of threats and use opportunities for enterprise development are still relevant. An effective risk management system under uncertainty conditions becomes an important tool for ensuring the competitiveness and development of the enterprise. Despite certain achievements in the issues of studying risk management, it remains problematic to coordinate the interaction of enterprise risk management with the medium of enterprise operation. Authors propose to solve this problem by means of anticipatory management in the system of risk management of a modern enterprise.

It is found that the risk management should not be aimed at minimizing, but in optimizing the permissible risks and maintaining a balance between the stability of the business and the level of riskiness of the situation. An integrated approach to the anticipatory risk management of the enterprise under uncertainty conditions is developed. This approach allows to maximize the effect of the interaction between risk management and enterprise management environment through early identification of potential events, predicting their future development and adoption of appropriate preventive measures to minimize the impact of threats and opportunities for enterprise development in the long term.

The theoretical value of the research is in development of methodical ensuring of effective risk management of the enterprise in modern conditions. Practical use of the developed approach to reduce the time limits, create an information base for development and sound management decisions, makes it possible to identify potential threats and opportunities before the date of their materialization with the aim of making appropriate preventive management measures. This allows to minimize the impact of threats and take advantage of opportunities for enterprise development. It is this approach to risk management that provides economic agents with competitive advantages in modern dynamic conditions of operation.

Author Biographies

Alexandr Lesko, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95, Khmelnytsky Highway str., Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 21000

PhD, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department

Department of Economics of Enterprise and Production Management 

Iryna Prychepa, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95, Khmelnytsky Highway str., Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 21000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Enterprise Economics and Production Management

Tatyana Lesko, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 95, Khmelnytsky Highway str., Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 21000

Department of Economics Enterprise and Production Management

References

  1. Semenova, K. D., Tarasova, K. I. (2015). Systema upravlinnia ryzykamy pidpryiemstva. Materialy chetvertoi mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Ekonomika pidpryiemstva: suchasni problemy teorii ta praktyky». Odesa: Atlant, 203–205.
  2. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Ed. 8. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html
  3. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP1.html
  4. Mill, J. (1844). Elements of Political Economy. Ed. 3. London: Henry G. Bohn. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/MillJames/mljElm.html
  5. Smith, A. (1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. 5. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Available: http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html
  6. Keynes, J. M. (2016). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Stellar Classics, 168.
  7. Schumpeter, J. A. (1962). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press, 255.
  8. Markowits, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 1, 71–91.
  9. Koroliuk, T. M. (2011). Istorychnyi henezys poniattia «ryzyk»: oblikovo-ekonomichnyi aspekt. Available: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/old_jrn/Soc_Gum/Vlca_ekon/2011_36/43.pdf
  10. Vdovichenko, O. V. (2009). Minimizatsiia neopravdannogo riska. Available: http://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/journals/2009/NiO_5_2009/1_razdel/vdovigh.htm
  11. Sukhanova, N. (2011). Risks and threats in enterprise management in crisis situations: similarities and differences. Efektyvna ekonomika, 12. Available: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=2544
  12. Rudnichenko, E. (2013). Threats, risks, dangers: nature and relationship with the system of enterprise economic security. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Pidpryiemnytstvo, 25 (1), 188–195.
  13. Vishniakov, Ya. D., Radaev, N. N., Kirsanov, K. A. (2008). Obshchaia teoriia riskov. Moscow: Akademiia, 368.
  14. Balabanov, I. T. (1996). Risk-menedzhment. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 192.
  15. Verbitska, I. I. (2013). Risk management as a modern risk management system of enterprise structures. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, 5, 282–291.
  16. Lopatovskyi, V. H. (2008). Otsinka neobkhidnosti vykorystannia protsesu upravlinnia ryzykamy na pidpryiemstvi. Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university. Economic Sciences, 6 (1), 105–108.
  17. Shpandaruk, V. O. (2010). Vdoskonalennia upravlinnia ryzykamy pidpryiemstv na zasadakh realizatsii preventyvnykh zakhodiv. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 3 (1), 241–244.
  18. Starostina, A. O., Kravchenko, V. A. (2009). Ryzyk-menedzhment: teoriia ta praktyka. Kyiv: Kondor, 200.
  19. Mostenska, T., Skopenko, N. (2010). Risk management as a management tool, economic risks enterprise. Visnyk of Zaporizhzhya National University. Economic Sciences, 3 (7), 77–85.
  20. Tebekin, A. V. (2015). Metody priniatiia upravlencheskih reshenii. Moscow: Yurait, 572.
  21. Rudenskii, R. A.; In: Lysenko, Yu. G. (2009). Antisipativnoe upravlenie slozhnymi ekonomicheskimi sistemami: modeli, metody, instrumenty. Donetsk: Yugo-Vostok, 257.
  22. Ashley, W. C., Morrison, J. L. (1997). Anticipatory Management: Tools for Better Decision Making. The Futurist, 31 (5), 47–50.
  23. Harper, S. C., Glew, D. J. (2008). Anticipatory management can not be compromised. Industrial Engineer, 34. Available: https://www.entrepreneur.com
  24. Melnyk, O. G., Adamiv, M. Y. (2013). Anticipatory enterprise management based on weak signals. Actual Problems of Economiics, 1 (139), 32–41.
  25. Kuzmin, O. Y., Adamiv, M. Y. (2013). Method of Prospective Diagnosis of Weak Signals of Potential Phenomena by Types of Company Activity. Business Inform, 2, 69–74.
  26. Kuzmin, O. Ye., Lipych, L. H., Melnyk, O. H. et al. (2014). Antysypatyvne upravlinnia mashynobudivnymy pidpryiemstvamy na zasadakh slabkykh syhnaliv. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk, 224.

Published

2017-07-25

How to Cite

Lesko, A., Prychepa, I., & Lesko, T. (2017). Development of approach to anticipatory risk management of the enterprise under uncertainty conditions. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(36), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.108595

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research