Analysis and comparison of metal-oxide surge arrester models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.117836Keywords:
model of surge arrester, current impulse, voltage impulse, voltage-current characteristicAbstract
The objects of the research are: full and simplified dynamic models of surge arresters, as well as the model of surge arrester in the form of a nonlinear resistor. For the simulation of the voltage-current characteristics, in the latter case the approximation was used, describing by one expression both switching and lightning surge domain. At the present time, the traditional approach is applied for the study of surge arrester models. The surge arrester model is connected in series with a current source of a given waveform and amplitude. Then, the residual voltage is computed on the surge arrester model. The simulation results are compared with the corresponding passport values and a conclusion is made about the applicability of this model.
In practice, as a result of lightning activity, surge arresters are exposed to impulse voltage waves. The use of voltage impulses in comparing the models of metal-oxide surge arresters has not been studied sufficiently yet.
Analysis of different surge arrester models subjected to the lightning current impulses was carried out. The residual voltage, which arises in this case on the surge arresters, was computed. The results obtained with a nonlinear resistor do not differ from the results obtained with the full model by more than 5.74 %, and from the results obtained with the simplified model by more than 5.67 %. Analysis of the same surge arrester models subjected to the lightning voltage impulses was carried out. The residual voltage, which arises in this case on the surge arresters, was computed. The results obtained with a nonlinear resistor do not differ from the results obtained with the full model by more than 9.41 %, and from the results obtained with the simplified model by more than 7.85 %.
When making final choice of a particular surge arrester model, it is preferable, because of the need for a certain safety factor, to choose model which gives largest residual voltage values when the voltage impulses are applied. It has also been established that even when modeling a surge arrester in the form of a nonlinear resistor, but taking into account the approximation of its voltage-current characteristic by one expression, the results do not exceed the limits of engineering accuracy.
References
- Modeling of metal oxide surge arresters. (1992). IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 7 (1), 302–309. doi:10.1109/61.108922
- Pinceti, P., Giannettoni, M. (1999). A simplified model for zinc oxide surge arresters. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 14 (2), 393–398. doi:10.1109/61.754079
- Brzhezitsky, V., Masluchenko, I., Trotsenko, Y., Krysenko, D. (2015). Approximation of Volt-Ampere Characteristics of Metal-Oxide Surge Arresters. Scientific Works of National University of Food Technologies, 21 (1), 169–176.
- Saengsuwan, T., Thipprasert, W. (2004). Lightning arrester modeling using ATP-EMTP. 2004 IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON 2004. IEEE, 377–380. doi:10.1109/tencon.2004.1414786
- Peppas, G. D., Naxakis, I. A., Vitsas, C. T., Pyrgioti, E. C. (2012). Surge arresters models for fast transients. 2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP). IEEE, 1–6. doi:10.1109/iclp.2012.6344285
- Li, H. J., Birlasekaran, S., Choi, S. S. (2002). A parameter identification technique for metal-oxide surge arrester models. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 17 (3), 736–741. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2002.1022797
- Magro, M. C., Giannettoni, M., Pinceti, P. (2004). Validation of ZnO Surge Arresters Model for Overvoltage Studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 19 (4), 1692–1695. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2004.832354
- Fernandez, F., Diaz, R. (2001). Metal-oxide surge arrester model for fast transient simulations. Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Power System Transients, 681–687.
- Kim, I., Funabashi, T., Sasaki, H., Hagiwara, T., Kobayashi, M. (1996). Study of ZnO arrester model for steep front wave. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 11 (2), 834–841. doi:10.1109/61.489341
- Martinez, J. A., Durbak, D. W. (2005). Parameter Determination for Modeling Systems Transients – Part V: Surge Arresters IEEE PES Task Force on Data for Modeling System Transients of IEEE PES Working Group on Modeling and Analysis of System Transients Using Digital Simulation (General Systems Subcommittee). IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20 (3), 2073–2078. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2005.848771
- Miguel, P. M. (2014). Comparison of Surge Arrester Models. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29 (1), 21–28. doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2013.2279835
- Micro-Cap 11. Electronic Circuit Analysis Program. Reference Manual. (2014). Sunnyvale, CA: Spectrum Software, 1040. Available at: http://www.spectrum-soft.com/down/rm11.pdf
- Trotsenko, Y., Brzhezitsky, V., Masluchenko, I. (2016). Surge arrester modeling using Micro-Cap. Technology audit and production reserves, 6 (1 (32)), 26–30. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2016.86137
- Trotsenko, Y., Brzhezitsky, V., Masluchenko, I. (2017). Study of surge arrester model under influence of various current pulses. Technology audit and production reserves, 1 (1 (33)), 44–48. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2017.92244
- Trotsenko, Y., Brzhezitsky, V., Masluchenko, I. (2017). Analytical representation of switching current impulses for study of metal-oxide surge arrester models. Technology audit and production reserves, 5 (1 (37)), 24–29. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2017.109662
- Brittain, J. E. (1990). Thevenin’s theorem. IEEE Spectrum, 27 (3), 42. doi:10.1109/6.48845
- In: Martinez-Velasco, J. A. (2009). Power System Transients: Parameter Determination. CRC Press LLC, 644. doi:10.1201/9781420065305
- Lat, M. V. (1983). Thermal Properties of Metal Oxide Surge Arresters. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102 (7), 2194–2202. doi:10.1109/tpas.1983.318207
- He, Y., Fu, Z., Chen, J. (2016). Experimental validation of MOA simulation models for energy absorption estimation under different impulse currents. 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, 1–5. doi:10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741791
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Yevgeniy Trotsenko, Volodymyr Brzhezitsky, Yaroslav Haran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.