Paradoxes in the labor market of the 21st century: analysis of the microbusiness in Latvia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124688

Keywords:

virtualization of the economy, labor market, small business, microenterprises in Latvia

Abstract

The object of research is microenterprises in Latvia. One of the most problematic places is the constant tightening of fiscal measures in relation to existing and newly created microenterprises. Including the increase since 2017, the rate of turnover tax from 9 to 15% for enterprises with annual turnover of up to 40 thousand EUR. This creates conditions for the closure of a part of microenterprises or the departure of their owners to the informal sector, which is already happening. Taking into account that in Latvia every fifth inhabitant is subject to the risk of poverty (in 2015 – 21.8% of the population), a reduction in the incomes of families that have lost microbusiness can lead to the growth of the poor.

The research uses methods of comparative analysis of indicators of state statistics, the Register of Enterprises and other sources, which revealed both positive and negative aspects of microbusiness in Latvia. Particular attention is paid to the activities of microenterprises, which make a significant contribution to the economy of the country. In 2016, microenterprises employed about 248.57 thousand people or more than a third (35.2%) of employees of all Latvian enterprises.

The research results show that at least 20% of the able-bodied population is engaged in business in Latvia. Such large share is associated with the arrival of former employees in the microbusiness. However, not all of them are ready to develop their business, which follows from the small amount of tax revenues to the state budget from microenterprises. For many of them, the goal of profit is not a priority, which goes against the established paradigm. However, they provide the livelihoods of their families, which legislators should take into account

Author Biography

Olga Pavuk, Baltic International Academy, 4, Lomonosova str., Riga, Latvia, LV-1019

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

References

  1. Pavuk, O. (2011). Virtual'naya ekonomika: innovativnaya i spekulyativnaya. Problemy transformatsii sovremennoy rossiyskoy ekonomiki: teoriya i praktika organizatsii i obespecheniya upravleniya. Moscow: INION RAN, 76–81.
  2. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4 (16), 386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  3. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65–94. doi:10.2307/1884513
  4. Chandler, A. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 780.
  5. Schumpeter, J. A.; Clemence, R. V. (Ed.). (2010). Essays of J. A. Schumpeter (1951). Kessinger Publishing LLC, 338.
  6. Schumpeter, J. A. (1928). The Instability of Capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38 (151), 361–386. doi:10.2307/2224315
  7. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press, 280.
  8. Ericson, R., Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62 (1), 53–82. doi:10.2307/2297841
  9. Hopenhayn, H. A. (1992). Entry, Exit, and firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium. Econometrica, 60 (5), 1127–1150. doi:10.2307/2951541
  10. Jovanovic, B. (2001). New Technology and the Small Firm. Small Business Economics, 16 (1), 53–56. doi:10.1023/a:1011132809150
  11. Steven, K. (1996). Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review, 86 (3), 562–583.
  12. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 255.
  13. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Collins, 544.
  14. Kovalev, D. A. (2004). Postindustrial'noe obshhestvo i virtualizatsiya ekonomiki v razvitykh stranakh i Rossii. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki, 4 (12), 59–61
  15. Mantatova, L. V. (2004). Strategiya razvitiya: Tsennosti novoy tsivilizatsii. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel'stvo VSGTU, 242.
  16. Ivanov, D. V. (1998). Postindustrializm i virtualizatsiya ekonomiki. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii, 1 (1), 81–90. Available at: http://www.jourssa.ru/sites/all/files/volumes/1998_1/Ivanov_1998_1.pdf
  17. Pavuk, O., Moldenhauer, N. (2013). Employment as an indicator of economy virtualisation (by the example of the United States). Economic Annals-ХХI, 11–12 (1), 23–26.
  18. Pavuk, O. (2014). Research of microenterprises in Latvia in the context of resolving unemployment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4 (2 (18)), 32–36. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2014.26314
  19. Pavuk, O. (2016, December 15). Pirrova pobeda latviyskikh mikropredpriyatiy. Baltic-course.com. Riga. Available at: http://www.baltic-course.com/rus/kolonka_redaktora/?doc=17443
  20. Mazais bizness nodarbina 66 % no visiem Latvijas uzņēmumos strādājošajiem cilvēkiem. (2017, November 15). Lursoft. Riga. Available at: http://blog.lursoft.lv/2017/11/15/mazais-bizness-nodarbina-66-no-visiem-latvijas-uznemumos-stradajosajiem-cilvekiem/
  21. Uzņēmumu reģistra un komercreģistra subjektu reģistrācijas dinamika sadalījumā pēc to uzņēmējdarbības formas. Lursoft statistika. Available at: https://www.lursoft.lv/lursoft_statistika/?&id=15
  22. Latvija. Galvenie statistikas rādītāji. (2017). Latvijas statistika. Available at: http://www.csb.gov.lv/sites/default/files/nr_03_latvija_galvenie_statistikas_raditaji_2017_17_00_lv.pdf

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Pavuk, O. (2017). Paradoxes in the labor market of the 21st century: analysis of the microbusiness in Latvia. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(5(39), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124688

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5(39) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Olga Pavuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.