The numerical CFD investigation of hub losses of pushing air propellers with tandem joined blades of small sized unmanned aerial vehicles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2020.198084

Keywords:

propeller, secondary losses, propfan, hub vortex, tandem profile, Moebius band, box propeller, tandem propeller

Abstract

The object of study is a pushing tandem propeller with joined blades. When analyzing the characteristics of pushing propellers, it was found that one of the problem areas is a decrease in their effectiveness due to a decrease in axial thrust, which occurs due to the formation of a zone of reduced pressure (vacuum) in the area of the hub and the propeller spinner. For pushing propellers of the classic design, the reduction in efficiency reaches a level of 1–2 %. For tandem propellers, such information is not available due to the fact that such structures are practically not used on aircraft. However, in recent years, potential opportunities and advantages over classical propellers have increased the interest of researchers in the issues of their use in aircraft. It is noted that the tandem propeller should have greater hub losses compared to the classic propeller, since the diffuser of the interscapular channel is greater. To assess the value and establish the factors influencing the formation of hub losses of tandem propellers, studies were carried out using numerical gas dynamics methods. During the study, to simulate the operation of the tandem propeller, we used the ANSYS CFX software package, which implements an algorithm for solving unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations closed by the SST Menter turbulence model. As a result of modeling, it was found that the level of secondary losses in the hub part of a tandem propeller is significantly affected by the mutual arrangement of the profiles of the first and second blades. When the angle of profiles installation of the second blades row increases, the vacuum in the hub part and in the spinner zone increases, which leads to the appearance of reverse thrust and reduces the thrust of the propeller by an average of 3–4 %. The obtained results confirmed the assumption that the hub losses of the tandem propellers directly depend on the diffusivity of the interscapular canal in the blades root part. Consideration of research results in the design of tandem propellers will reduce hub losses and increase the efficiency of the propellers.

Author Biographies

Mykola Kulyk, National Aviation University, 1, Kosmonavta Komarova ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Aviation Engines

Fedir Kirchu, National Aviation University, 1, Kosmonavta Komarova ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

PhD, Associated Professor

Department of Aviation Engines

Hanesh Hussein, National Aviation University, 1, Kosmonavta Komarova ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Postgraduate Student

Department of Aviation Engines

References

  1. Atinault, O., Carrier, G., Grenon, R., Verbecke, C., Viscat, P. (2013). Numerical and Experimental Aerodynamic Investigations of Boundary Layer Ingestion for Improving Propulsion Efficiency of Future Air Transport. 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2406
  2. Seitz, A., Gologan, C. (2014). Parametric design studies for propulsive fuselage aircraft concepts. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 6 (1), 69–82. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0130-3
  3. European Comission. Flightpath 2050: Europe’s vision for aviation, report of the high level group on aviation research. (2011). Publications Office of the European Union.
  4. Drela, M., Mueller, T. J. (1989). XFOIL – An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics. Berlin: Springer-Velag, 1–12. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1
  5. McGranahan, B. D., Selig, M. S. (2003). Surface Oil Flow Measurements on several Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-4067
  6. Brandt, J. B. (2005). Small-Scale Propeller Performance at Low Speeds. Champaign. Available at: https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/props/volume-1/Brandt_2005_UIUC-MS-Thesis.pdf
  7. Wang, M. H. (1985) Hub Effects in Propeller Design and Analysis. Massachusetts. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a158853.pdf
  8. Yin, J., Stuermer, A., Aversano, M. (2012). Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Analysis of Installed Pusher-Propeller Aircraft Configurations. Journal of Aircraft, 49 (5), 1423–1433. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031704
  9. Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Sciacchitano, A., Veldhuis, L., Eitelberg, G. (2016). Propeller and inflow vortex interaction: vortex response and impact on the propeller performance. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 7 (3), 419–428. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0198-z
  10. Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Sciacchitano, A., Veldhuis, L., Eitelberg, G. (2015). Propeller and inflow vortex interaction: vortex response and impact on the propeller performance. 5th CEAS Air & Space Conference. Delft, Sep.
  11. Capitao Patrao, A. (2018). On the Aerodynamic Design of the Boxprop. Gothenburg, 74. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328530718_On_the_Aerodynamic_Design_of_the_Boxprop
  12. Shen, C., Qiang, X., Teng, J. (2012). Numerical and experimental investigation of an axial compressor flow with tandem cascade. Journal of Thermal Science, 21 (6), 500–508. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-012-0574-x
  13. Capitao Patrao, A., Avellán, R., Lundbladh, A., Grönstedt, T. (2016). Wake and Loss Analysis for a Double Bladed Swept Propeller. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo. Seoul. doi: http://doi.org/10.1115/gt2016-56540
  14. Ruchala, P. (2016). An influence of pusher propeller cover on its performance – A concept of wind tunnel investigation. Journal of KONES, 23 (4), 429–434. doi: http://doi.org/10.5604/12314005.1217263
  15. Xu, J.-H., Song, W.-P., Yang, X.-D., Zhang, Y. (2017). Investigation on Improving Efficiency of High-Altitude Propeller with Tandem Configuration. AIAA AVIATION Forum. 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Denver, 12. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-3575
  16. Djihada, B., Omar, I. (2017). Impact of some geometrical aspects on the tandem co-rotating propeller hydrodynamic characteristics. Brodogradnja, 68 (1), 107–123. doi: http://doi.org/10.21278/brod68107
  17. Jiang, X., Li, T., Hu, J., Lin, Y. (2019). Numerical Simulation and Design of Parameter Matching on the Open Water Performance of CRP. The 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. Honolulu, 8.
  18. Jung, H., Kanemoto, T., Liu, P. (2017). A Numerical Prediction of Tip Vortices from Tandem Propellers in the Counter-Rotating Type Tidal Stream Power Unit. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 5 (12), 66–74. doi:10.4236/jpee.2017.512009
  19. Tillman, G., Ochs, S. S., Kearney, J. S., Wake, B. E. (2006). Control of high-reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer separation using counter-flow fluid injection. 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, 14. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-3025
  20. Cerretelli, C., Gharaibah, E., Toplack, G., Gupta, A., Wuerz, W. (2009). Unsteady separation control for wind turbine applications at full scale reynolds numbers. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-380
  21. Parra P. H. G., Angulo M. V. D., Gaona G. E. E. (2018). CFD Analysis of two and four blades for multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Conference: 2018 IEEE 2nd Colombian Conference on Robotics and Automation (CCRA), 7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ccra.2018.8588130
  22. Shi, W., Li, J., Yang, Z., Zhang, H. (2018). CFD Analysis of Contrarotating Open Rotor Aerodynamic Interactions. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 1–13. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9538787
  23. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32 (8), 1598–1605. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

Downloads

Published

2019-12-24

How to Cite

Kulyk, M., Kirchu, F., & Hussein, H. (2019). The numerical CFD investigation of hub losses of pushing air propellers with tandem joined blades of small sized unmanned aerial vehicles. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(1(51), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2020.198084

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1(51) (2020): Industrial and technology systems

Section

Mechanics: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Mykola Kulyk, Fedir Kirchu, Hanesh Hussein

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.