Development of methods for assessing the economic effect of using a complex impulse technologies and equipment for aggregate assembly structure of the aircraft

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.215691

Keywords:

economic effect, complex of pulse technologies and equipment, aggregate assembly of aircraft

Abstract

The object of the study is the economic effect of using a set of pulse technologies and equipment for unit assembly of aircraft structures with fixed mechanical connections. One of the main selected factors that ensure the economic effect is to improve the quality, static strength and durability of the structure, reducing the weight of the aircraft structure.

The analysis of modern methods and approaches of definition of economic indicators of new technics and technologies products introduction at the enterprise which help to predict the general economic effect is carried out. The comparative efficiency of the introduced technology is used in relation to the basic one, which is used at the enterprises of the branch. The components of the economic effect from the application of a pulse technologies and equipment set are determined and the approach to the economic effect calculations from the creation and improvement of pneumatic manual pulse device (PMPD) in computer-aided design (CAD) systems is formed.

In the course of the research methods for estimating the economic effect at introduction of new constructive and technological decisions of aircraft design and at application of a pulse technologies and equipment set, and also at application of PMPD CAD are offered. In comparison with similar known methods, the proposed approaches can minimize the time spent on calculations and increase the accuracy of their intended purpose. It provides an opportunity to demonstrate qualitatively the feasibility of using a pulse technologies and equipment set for unit assembly of aircraft structures with non-removable mechanical connections.

Here are some ways to evaluate the effectiveness of using a decision support system (DSS). DSS contains methods, models and algorithms for decision-making, software, databases and knowledge of the subject area and recommendations for the practical use of the results of the source information analysis. The factors influencing the economic result of the use of DSS in production are shown in the form of a scheme, where for the economic life of the investment in the creation of DSS 6 years commonly-accepted for CAD were selected.

Author Biographies

Iuriy Vorobiov, National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», 17, Chkalova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

PhD

Kateryna Maiorova, National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», 17, Chkalova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Aircraft Manufacturing Technologies

References

  1. Samochkin, V. N., Pronin, Iu. B., Logacheva, E. N. (2000). Gibkoe razvitie predpriiatiia: Effektivnost i biudzhetirovanie. Moscow: Delo, 352.
  2. Cabral, L. (2000). Introduction to industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 424.
  3. Church, J., Ware, R. (2000). Industrial organization. A strategic approach. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill. Available at: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/1663633/mod_resource/content/1/ChurchWare.pdf
  4. Antonelli, C. (2004). The Economics of Innovation, New Technologies and Structural Change. Torino, 78.
  5. Tochilin, P. V., Sagatelian, G. R., Nazarov, Iu. F. (2001). Metodika rascheta ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti vnedreniia naukoemkikh tekhnologii. MGOU–XXI–Novye tekhnologii, 1, 29–34.
  6. Vorobev, Iu. A. (2003). Opredelenie ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti vnedreniia tekhnologii impulsnoi klepki. Avіatsіino-kosmіchna tekhnіka і tekhnologіia, 1 (36), 76–81.
  7. Pokropyvnyi, S. F. (Ed.) (2006). Ekonomika pidpryiemstva. Kyiv: KNEU, 350.
  8. Tönissen, S. (2014). Economic Efficiency of Manufacturing Technology Integration. Aachen: Apprimus Verlag. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36618919.pdf
  9. Petrou, A.; Michalos, A. C. (Еds.) (2014). Economic Efficiency. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 1793–1794. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_818
  10. Burk, C. (2018). Techno-Economic Modeling for New Technology Development. The Global Home of Chemical Engineers. Available at: https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/2018/january/techno-economic-modeling-new-technology-development
  11. Tönissen, S., Rey, J., Klocke, F. (2015). Economic efficiency of manufacturing technology integration. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 173–181. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.07.003
  12. Richter, A. (2013). Economic Advantages by CAD/CAM Use in Compound with Production Data Organization. Digital Product and Process Development Systems: IFIP TC 5 International Conference. NEW PROLAMAT. Dresden, 53–60
  13. Chang, K.-H. (2013). Product Manufacturing and Cost Estimating Using CAD/CAE. Academic Press, 570. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-0-00833-2
  14. Yifu Lin, J., Liu, P. (2020). Inclusive catch-up: the new structural economics approach. Recovering better: economic and social challenges and opportunities A compilation of the High-level Advisory Board on Economic and Social Affairs, 52–68.
  15. Pick, R. A., Weatherholt, N. (2012). A Review On Evaluation And Benefits Of Decision Support Systems. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS), 17 (1), 7–20. doi: http://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v17i1.7580
  16. Lin, J. Y. (2013). New structural economics. doi: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
  17. Boukhayma, K., ElManouar, A. (2015). Evaluating decision support systems. 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA). Marrakech: IEEE. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/isda.2015.7489263
  18. Boukhayma, K., Ben Hiba, L., Elmanouar, A. (2019). DSS success: The intertwining of satisfaction and learning. The ArabWIC 6th Annual International Conference Research Track. doi: http://doi.org/10.1145/3333165.3333174
  19. Vinodh, S., Jayakrishna, K., Kumar, V., Dutta, R. (2013). Development of decision support system for sustainability evaluation: a case study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16 (1), 163–174. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0613-7

Downloads

Published

2020-10-31

How to Cite

Vorobiov, I., & Maiorova, K. (2020). Development of methods for assessing the economic effect of using a complex impulse technologies and equipment for aggregate assembly structure of the aircraft. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(4(55), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.215691

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4(55) (2020): Economics of enterprises. Macroeconomics

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Iuriy Vorobiov, Kateryna Maiorova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.