The prerequisite for social-psychological adaptation of turkmen students, who are studying in Ukraine

Authors

  • Ірина Михайлівна Соколова Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy, Str. University, 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003, Ukraine
  • Оксана Петрівна Нікітіна Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy, Str. University, 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21703

Keywords:

social-psychological adaptation, interpersonal interaction, education of foreign students, Turkmen student

Abstract

This article aims to determine the characteristics of the attitude to the Other as a premise prerequisite of the social-psychological adaptation of Turkmen students that are studying in Ukrainian universities. Successful adaptation contributes, on the one hand, the rapid inclusion of students to the learning process, allows to solve the problem of retention of  contingent, and on the other - it helps to improve the quality of the training of young people in Ukrainian universities. The study sample consisted of students of the first and second years of study of International Educational Programs Department of the Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy. The  techniques of  “Diagnostics of social-psychological adaptation of К. Rogers and R. Diamond” and “Diagnostics of interpersonal relationships T. Leary” were used. The conducted empirical research has allowed to determine that the adaptability is associated with the manifestation of the tendency to dominate in interaction with others, leadership skills, self-acceptance. The relationships of indicators of social-psychological adjustment with indicators of severity of different styles of interpersonal interaction of Turkmen students were revealed. It was defined that self-acceptance is above when students have friendly attitudes with others. The external control is typical for Turkmen students, who are characterized by the tendency to dominate and straightforwardness in dealing with others. The adaptability index decreases among students from Turkmenistan, who are inclined to criticism, suspicion, frustration on environment, do not take themselves, do not dominate in relationships with others. Results can be used in the work of curators, teachers, psychologists and social workers.

Author Biographies

Ірина Михайлівна Соколова, Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy, Str. University, 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003

Doctor of Psychological Science, professor, Head of the Department of Applied Psychology

Оксана Петрівна Нікітіна, Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy, Str. University, 16, Kharkov, Ukraine, 61003

Candidate of Psychological Science, Associate Professor

Department of Applied Psychology

References

  1. Крысько, В. Г. Этнопсихологический словарь [Текст] / В. Г. Крысько. – М., 1999. – 343 c.
  2. Абульханова, К. А. Психосоциальный и субъектный подходы к исследованию личности в условиях социальных изменений [Текст] / К. А. Абульханова // Психологический журнал. – 2007. – Т. 28, № 5. – С. 5−14.
  3. Реан, А. А. Психология адаптации личности. Анализ, теория, практика [Текст] / А. А. Реан, А. Р. Кудашев А. А. Баранов. – СПб.: прайм-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2006. – 480 с.
  4. Платонов, Ю. П. Основы этнической психологии [Текст]: учеб. пособие / Ю. П. Платонов. – СПб.: Речь, 2003. – 452 с.
  5. Стефаненко, Т. Г. Этнопсихология [Текст]: учебник для вузов / Т. Г. Стефаненко. – М.: Аспект-Пресс, 2003. – 368 с.
  6. Вегвари, В. Межкультурный диалог в эпоху «открытых границ» [Текст]/ В. Вегвари // Русский язык как иностранный: специфика описания, теория и практика преподавания в России и за рубежом. – М.: Моск. ун-т, 2001. – С. 69-70.
  7. Гудков, Д. Б. Межкультурная коммуникация: проблемы обучения [Текст] / Д. Б. Гудков. – М.: МГУ, 2000. – 120 с.
  8. Ионин, Л. Г. Культурный шок: конфликт этнических стереотипов [Текст] / Л. Г. Ионин // Психология национальной нетерпимости. – Минск, 1998. – С. 104-114.
  9. Лебедева, Н. М. Межкультурный диалог: Тренинг этнокультурной компетентности [Текст]/ Н. М. Лебедева, О. В. Лунева, Т. Г. Стефаненко. – М.: РУДН, 2003. – 268 с.
  10. Иванова, М. А. Исследование состояния тревожности и личностных характеристик студентов интернациональной группы [Текст]/ М. А. Иванова, В. П. Трусов // Психические состояния (экспериментальная и прикладная психология). – Л., ЛГУ, 1981. – Вып. 10. – C. 167-174.
  11. Kryisko, V. G. (1999). Etnopsihologicheskiy slovar. M., 343.
  12. Abulhanova, K. A. (2007). Psihosotsialnyiy i sub'ektniy podhodyi k issledovaniyu lichnosti v usloviyah sotsialnyih izmeneniy. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal, № 5, T. 28, 5-14.
  13. Rean, A. A., Kudashev, A. R., Baranov, A. A. (2006). Psihologiya adaptatsii lichnosti. Analiz, teoriya, praktika. SPb.: praym-EVROZNAK, 480.
  14. Platonov, Yu. P. (2003). Osnovyi etnicheskoy psihologii. SPb.: Rech, 2003, 452.
  15. Stefanenko, T. G. (2003). Etnopsihologiya. M.: Aspekt-Press, 368.
  16. Vegvari, V. (2001). Mezhkulturnyiy dialog v epohu «otkryityih granits». Russkiy yazyik kak inostrannyiy: spetsifika opisaniya, teoriya i praktika prepodavaniya v Rossii i za rubezhom. M.: Mosk. un-t, 69-70.
  17. Gudkov, D. B. (2000). Mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya: problemyi obucheniya. M.: MGU, 120.
  18. Ionin, L. G. (1988). Kulturnyiy shok: konflikt etnicheskih stereotipov. Psihologiya natsionalnoy neterpimosti. Minsk, 104-114.
  19. Lebedeva, N. M., Luneva, O. V., Stefanenko, T. G. (2003). Mezhkulturnyiy dialog: Trening etnokulturnoy kompetentnosti. M.: RUDN, 268.
  20. Ivanova, M. A., Trusov, V. P. (1981). Issledovanie sostoyaniya trevozhnosti i lichnostnyih harakteristik studentov internatsionalnoy gruppyi. Psihicheskie sostoyaniya (eksperimentalnaya i prikladnaya psihologiya), vyip. 10, 167-174.

Published

2014-02-06

How to Cite

Соколова, І. М., & Нікітіна, О. П. (2014). The prerequisite for social-psychological adaptation of turkmen students, who are studying in Ukraine. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(15), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21703