Development of an innovative methodology of research of systems on an example of a shadow economy as an invariant of system of economic security of state

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.239035

Keywords:

shadow economy, economic safety, transaction costs, diagnostic indicators, proportional distribution, entropy testing

Abstract

The object of research is the shadow economy as structural component (invariant) of economic security of state on example of Ukraine. The level of shadowing of Ukrainian economy requires improvement of both: the system of indicators and mechanism of influence on the level of shadowing on the basis of using of fundamental constants of mathematics of harmony and principle of structural harmony of systems.

Under research, fundamental provisions and methods of the theory of safety studies, economic theory, theories of systems and structural harmony of systems, institutionalism, transdisciplinary nature were used. The theme of management of the system of economic security of the state is investigated from various scientific positions of classical science. At the same time, practically ignores the theory of synergetic, which is the synthesis of transdisciplinary approach, price approach, classical theory of systems, structural harmony of systems, theory of fractals and attractors and other components of theory of complexity.

Obviously, any system has metric characteristics inherent. The most widespread math constant found in nature is the Phidias number (Golden section). Meаsure is the most important component of all and any knowledge, without it any description of processes and phenomena will be incorrect. The law of measures, or the law of proportional distribution with its derivatives can be defined as law of projecting and organizing sustainable systems at all levels of hierarchical management. The structure of the system is the most conservative characteristic of it as opposed to the state of the system. The properties of the system as a whole are determined not only the properties of its individual elements, but also the properties of the structure of the system as whole. They depend on the existence of the system. The existence of the system retains these parameters in the process of adapting the system to external conditions and thus maintains the existence of the system itself.

Matching the metric quality system of economic security of the state and obtaining a conclusion on its stability and abilities to self-organization under the conditions of shadowing of the economy can be carried out by comparison. It is carried out using attractors representing a recurrent number of gold sections: 0.500 ...; 0.618 ...; 0.682 ...; 0.725, as well as – distractors: 0.5698 ...; 0.6540 ...; 0.7053. An integral indicator characterizing the state of any system is the relative information entropy by Shannon. Entropy testing of the system (calculation of relative information entropy) is a logical component of the innovative model of system research.

Author Biographies

Tatiana Yegorova-Gudkova, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Marketing and Business Administration

Maksim Bojko, Usatov Police Department of Bilyaiv Police Department of Main Directorate of National Police in Odesa Region

Head of Department

Yurii Neustroiev, Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Financial and Economic Security and Economic Theory

Oleg Khostash, Odessa Branch of State Public Joint-Stock Company «National Joint-Stock Company «Ukragroleasing»

Director

Li Pan, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Postgraduate Student

Department of Management of Enterprises

Hryhorii Shepitko, Bar Association «G.M. Partners»

Lawyer, Director

Maryna Kirilina, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Senior Lecturer

Department of Marketing and Business Administration

Irina Matjukhina, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Rector Referred Secretary

References

  1. Schneider, F., Buehn, A. (2016). Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9820. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp9820.pdf
  2. Schneider, F. (2013). The Shadow Economy in Europe. Available at: http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2015/Shadow_Economy_Europe.pdf
  3. Schneider, F. (2021). Wirtschaftseinbruch infolge der Corona-Pandemie lässt die Schattenwirtschaft steigen. Prognose zur Entwicklung der Schattenwirtschaft. Available at: https://www.iaw.edu/pressemitteilungen-detail/pressemitteilung-vom-2-februar-2021-wirtschaftseinbruch-infolge-der-corona-pandemie-laesst-die-schattenwirtschaft-steigen.html?file=files/dokumente/IAW-JKU_PE_Schattenwirtschaftsprognose_2021_vom_02.02.2021.pdf
  4. Lutkevich, B. (2020). Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Available at: https://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/Sarbanes-Oxley-Act
  5. Coase, R. H. (1990). The Firm, the Market, and the Law. University of Chicago Press, 226.
  6. De Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. HarperCollins, 271.
  7. Arkhireev, S. I. (2000). Transaktsionnye izderzhki i neravenstva vusloviiakh rynochnoi transformatsii. Kharkiv: Biznes Inform, 288.
  8. Oleinik, A. N. (2002). Institutsionalnaia ekonomika. Moscow: Infra–M., 416.
  9. Yehorova-Hudkova, T. I. (2020). Systema ekonomichnoi bezpeky derzhavy v umovakh zmin: transdystsiplinarnist, samoorhanizatsiia, pryrodopodibnyi pidkhid. Odesa: KP «Odeska miska typohrafiia», 353.
  10. Soroko, E. M. (2019). Zoloti peretyny, protsesy samoorhanizatsii i evoliutsii system: Vvedennia v zahalnu teoriiu harmonii system. Moscow: Knyzhkovyi budynok «LIBROKOM», 264.
  11. Pranhishvili, I. V. (2003). Entropiini i inshi systemni zakonomirnosti: pytannia upravlinnia skladnymy systemamy. Moscow: Nauka, 428.
  12. Kriuchkova, I. V. (2005). Makrostrukturni faktory rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy ta Zakon zolotoho peretynu. Ekonomist, 9, 32–49.
  13. Yegorova-Gudkova, T. (2012). Projecting of steady complexity economic systems on self-organizing principles as a component of anti-crisis strategy. 2012 International Conferenceon Trends and Cycles in Global Dynamics and Perspectives of World Development. Chengdu, 40–41.
  14. Yegorova-Gudkova, T., Panj, L. (2020). Economic security and principles of self-organization: china's experience. Economics, finance and management review, 2, 43–53. doi: http://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2020-2-43
  15. Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J. B., Battiston, S. (2011). The Network of Global Corporate Control. PLoS ONE, 6 (10), e25995. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025995
  16. Lorenz, E. N. (1995). The essence of chaos. University of Washington Press, 240.
  17. Lorenz, H. W. (1993). Nonlinear Dynamical Economicsand Chaotic Motion. Berlin Springer, 248.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

How to Cite

Yegorova-Gudkova, T., Bojko, M., Neustroiev, Y., Khostash, O., Pan, L., Shepitko, H., Beloborodko, V., Zvirkov, O., Kirilina, M., & Matjukhina, I. (2021). Development of an innovative methodology of research of systems on an example of a shadow economy as an invariant of system of economic security of state. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(60), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.239035

Issue

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Reports on Research Projects