Classification of uncertainties in the management of organizational and technological objects

Authors

  • Тетяна Олександрівна Прокопенко Cherkasy State Technological University, 460, Avenue Shevchenko, Cherkassy, Ukraine, 18006, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-0708

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.30336

Keywords:

uncertainty, risk, classification, strategic management, decision-making

Abstract

The classification of uncertainties on different grounds in the management of organizational and technological objects in different industries (food, chemical, oil refining) is discussed in the article and some results of our research in this area are given. The main aim of the study is the classification of uncertainty in the management of organizational and technological objects. Such industries as food, chemical, oil refining process are characterized by complexity, variability of performance indicators, high capitalization ratio, depending on the influence of environmental factors. This article discussed the various features of the emergence of uncertainties, which allows to classify uncertainty for further classification of risks in the management of organizational and technological objects. The presented classification of uncertainties allows to structure the possible risks in the management of complex organizational and technological objects in the current and strategic activities, as well as to identify possible methods of dealing with the risks and how to avoid them. Classification of uncertainty, suggested by the author, it is recommended for use in the development of expert systems for risk management of technological systems of continuous type, including businesses and corporations of sugar industry. The research results can be applied in decision support systems for the sugar industry.

Author Biography

Тетяна Олександрівна Прокопенко, Cherkasy State Technological University, 460, Avenue Shevchenko, Cherkassy, Ukraine, 18006

Ph.D., Associate Professor

Department of economic Cybernetics and marketing

References

  1. Kuntsevich, C. M. (2006). Upravlenie v yslpviyah neopredelenosti: garantirovanie rezyltati v zadachah upravleniya i identefikacii. Kyiv: Naykova dymka, 264.
  2. Zgurovsky, M. H., Pankratova, N. D. (2007). Fundamentals of system analysis. Kyiv: Wydawnicza group ВНV, 546.
  3. Altunin, A. E., Samohin, M. C. (2000). Models and algorithms for decision making in fuzzy conditions. Tyumen: Publishing house of the Tyumen state University, 352.
  4. Kiryushkin, C. E., Larionov, I. C. (2009). Fundamentals of risk management. Moscow: "Ankil", 130.
  5. Trahtengerts, E. A. (2005). Computer support the formation of goals and strategies. Moskow: SINTEG, 224.
  6. Novikov, D. A. (2005). Management Theory organizational systems. Moskow: NSI, 584.
  7. Tsypkin, Y. Z., Polyak, B. T. (1990). Frequency criteria robust modal linear discrete systems. Automation, № 5, 4-11.
  8. Miroshnik, I. C., Nikiforov, V. O., Fradkov, A. L. (2000). Nonlinear and adaptive control of complex dynamic systems. SPb.: Science, 549.
  9. Tsypkin, Y. Z. (1992). Robust stability of nonlinear discrete systems with parametric uncertainty. Automation, №. 4, 3-9.
  10. Levin, B. I. (1998). Interval mathematics and the study of uncertain systems. Information technologies, №. 6, 27-33.
  11. Trahtengerts, E. A.; In: Abramova, N. A., Ginsberg, K. S., Novikov, D. A. (2006). Subjectivity in strategic management. The Human factor in management. M.: Komkniga, 408-438.

Published

2014-12-23

How to Cite

Прокопенко, Т. О. (2014). Classification of uncertainties in the management of organizational and technological objects. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(4(20), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.30336

Issue

Section

Information technology and control systems