Choice of method for fluid inflow liquidation

Authors

  • Микола Петрович Олексюк Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-0715
  • Ігор Станіславович Васько Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-5800
  • Андрій Романович Юрич Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-6191

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.31852

Keywords:

hole drilling, fluid, fluid inflow liquidation

Abstract

The analysis of scientific articles and published industry data to generalize the problem of fluid inflow liquidation and develop the recommendations for choosing the optimal method of fluid ablation with accounting the conditions of its admission into the hole is conducted in the article. It is established that the widest practical application have the acquired expectations and weighting method and the "driller method". A generalized comparison of methods is obtained and the factors that affect the technological possibility of their implementation are established. The basic of which is the amount of fluid that entered the hole. The recommendations on their use depending on the conditions of inflows are developed. The results of the investigation can be used by drilling-engineers at inflow liquidation and professionals involved in the creation of intelligent decision support systems.

Author Biographies

Микола Петрович Олексюк, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019

Senior lecturer

Department of drilling oil and gas wells

Ігор Станіславович Васько, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of drilling oil and gas wells

Андрій Романович Юрич, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, 15 Karpatska Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of drilling oil and gas wells

 

References

  1. Zvonova, O. (22.04.2014). Avariya v Meksikanskom zalive: hronika sobyitiy i ekologicheskie posledstviya. Available: www.aif.ru/dontknows/file/1154585
  2. Bowers, G. L. (1995, June 1). Pore Pressure Estimation From Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction. SPE Drilling & Completion, Vol. 10, № 2, 89–95. doi:10.2118/27488-pa
  3. Bowers, G. L. (2002, February). Detecting high overpressure. The Leading Edge, Vol. 21, № 2, 174–177. doi:10.1190/1.1452608
  4. Myislyuk, M. A., Luzhanitsa, A. V., Bliznyukov, V. Yu. (1995). Vyibor ratsionalnyih tehnologicheskih resheniy pri razburivanii zon AVPD. М., 67.
  5. Shevtsov, V. D. (1988). Preduprezhdenie gazoproyavleniy i vyibrosov pri burenii glubokih skvazhin. Moskva: Nedra, 201.
  6. Kuksov, A. K., Babayan, E. V., Shevtsov, V. D. (1992). Preduprezhdenie i likvidatsiya gazoneftevodoproyavleniy pri burenii. Moskva: Nedra, 251.
  7. Myislyuk, M. A. (2010). O vyibore tehnologii likvidatsii flyuidoproyavleniya. Stroitelstvo neftyanyih i gazovyih skvazhin na sushe i na more, № 3, 19-23.
  8. Kozlov, E. N., Kustyishev, A. V., Abdullin, R. S. (2014). Osobennosti glusheniya skvazhin na Talakanskom neftegazokondensatnom mestorozhdenii Stroitelstvo neftyanyih i gazovyih skvazhin na sushe i na more, № 6, 31-34.
  9. Bom, J., Brigan, D., Lope, B. (2002). Preduprezhdenie i likvidatsiya gazoneftevodoproyavleniy. Perevod s frantsuzskogo. Moskva: Nedra, 140.
  10. Vaisberh, H. L., Rymchuk, D. V. (2002). Fontanna bezpeka. Kharkiv, 474
  11. SOU 11.2-30019775-031:2004. Sverdlovyny na naftu ta haz. Poperedzhennya ta likvidatsiya avariy pry burinni. Kharkiv: DK «Ukrhazvydobuvannya», 90.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-23

How to Cite

Олексюк, М. П., Васько, І. С., & Юрич, А. Р. (2014). Choice of method for fluid inflow liquidation. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(5(20), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.31852

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 5(20) (2014): Scientific outcomes 2014

Section

Processes and equipment of food and chemical industries

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Микола Петрович Олексюк, Ігор Станіславович Васько, Андрій Романович Юрич

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.