Assessment of strike effectiveness against enemy landing groups considering sequential volleys and combat potential reduction in computer simulation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.346398

Keywords:

computer simulations, simulation framework, naval landing, anti-ship missiles, stochastic models

Abstract

The object of research is a naval landing operations and interactions between anti-ship missiles and naval forces in a variety of simulation scenarios. Computer simulation is an essential tool for modeling and evaluating complex processes. Strategy-oriented video games allow model and interact with multi-layered systems in a modern warfare, in a variety of scenarios. This research presents a framework for modeling naval landing operation in a strategic wargame. The model focused on the interactions between attacking player using transport ships for naval landing, fire-support ships, minesweepers, electronic warfare units, and interceptor aircraft, and defending player which using anti-ship missile launchers and naval minefields. A key objective is to identify optimal defensive strategies under resource constraints, calculation possible unit interactions, to estimate possible outcomes, which can help that determine the best tools to prevent or execute successful naval landing operation.

The methodology was implemented using stochastic mathematical model to estimate the effectiveness of anti-ship missiles against different types of ships with different defensive setups. The methodology proposes different approaches, for the defending side player, targeting the most vulnerable or most important parts of attacking player convoy to ensure the most effective way to prevent naval landing operation.

Experiment results show the importance of dynamic targets prioritization for the defending player, and allows increase the efficiency of the provided resources up to two times compared to the basic targeting algorithm.

The given framework allows to improve realism of naval combat simulations in a video game and offers a scalable foundation for game balance adjustments or potential application in tactical training environments.

Author Biographies

Oleksii Neizhpapa, Ukrainian Navy

Vice Admiral, Commander

Maksym Maksymov, Scientific Research Center of the Armed Forces of Ukraine "State Oceanarium" of the Institute of the Naval Forces of National University “Odesa Maritime Academy”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Сhief Researcher

Oleksandr Toshev, Odesа Polytechnic National University

PhD Student

Department of Computer Technologies of Automation

References

  1. Sun, Q., Zhang, C., Liu, N., Zhou, W., Qi, N. (2019). Guidance laws for attacking defended target. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 32 (10), 2337–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.05.011
  2. Hull, D. G., Radke, J. J., Mack, R. E. (1991). Time-to-go prediction for homing missiles based on minimum-time intercepts. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14 (5), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20725
  3. Gao, P., Du, Z., Zhang, L., Zhao, P., Liu, H., Yan, M. (2021). Damage assessment for large-scale surface warship systems using a dynamic location damage tree model quantified based on the multilevel Monte Carlo simulation. Ocean Engineering, 237, 109597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109597
  4. Lukosch, H. K., Bekebrede, G., Kurapati, S., Lukosch, S. G. (2018). A Scientific Foundation of Simulation Games for the Analysis and Design of Complex Systems. Simulation & Gaming, 49 (3), 279–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118768858
  5. Ridolfi, G., Mooij, E., Corpino, S. (2012). Complex-Systems Design Methodology for Systems-Engineering Collaborative Environment. Systems Engineering – Practice and Theory. https://doi.org/10.5772/32186
  6. Palumbo, N., Blauwkamp, R., Lloyd, J. (2010). Basic Principles of Homing Guidance. Johns Hopkins Apl Technical Digest, 29, 25–41. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292646184_Basic_Principles_of_Homing_Guidance
  7. Vego, M. (2020). General Naval Tactics; Theory and Practice. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 464.
  8. Perelman, A., Shima, T., Rusnak, I. (2011). Cooperative Differential Games Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34 (3), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51611
  9. Maksimov, M. V., Pelykh, S. N., Maslov, O. V., Baskakov, V. E. (2009). Model of cladding failure estimation for a cycling nuclear unit. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 239 (12), 3021–3026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.08.025
  10. Ranajit, D., Sirisha Ch. V., Kumar, C. M. (2018). Homing Guidance Design Challenges for Tactical Missile. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51 (1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.007
  11. Pelykh, S. N., Maksimov, M. V. (2013). A method of fuel rearrangement control considering fuel element cladding damage and burnup. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 87 (5), 84–90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289947830_A_method_of_fuel_rearrangement_control_considering_fuel_element_cladding_damage_and_burnup
Assessment of strike effectiveness against enemy landing groups considering sequential volleys and combat potential reduction in computer simulation

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Neizhpapa, O., Maksymov, M., & Toshev, O. (2025). Assessment of strike effectiveness against enemy landing groups considering sequential volleys and combat potential reduction in computer simulation. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(2(86), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2025.346398

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes