Modeling of resource provision of economic security of corporate culture in public administration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.364320

Keywords:

company culture, civil service, institutional sustainability, resources, optimization, security, management, personnel, potential

Abstract

The object of research is the resource provision of economic security of corporate culture in public administration in the context of digital transformation. The problem being solved is to form a comprehensive approach to the specified object. Currently, the implementation of digital transformation tools is forming new requirements for organizational behavior, personnel stability and the management apparatus of state institutions. A generalization and justification of the place of corporate culture as a component of an intangible asset, which creates opportunities for authorities to ensure an appropriate level of economic security. The paper proposes a mathematical model for assessing the impact of corporate culture on economic security based on sequential actions: assignment, normalization of weight coefficients and multi-criteria assessment of subordinates. The methodological basis is the use of tools for correlation and regression analysis, index method, expert assessment and adaptive modelling. Resource elements of corporate culture are identified, such as digital competencies, mentoring, experience, and innovative activity. All of them have an impact on the aggregate indicator of economic security (r = 0.82–0.91). The results obtained indicate a transition to a digital cultural environment, which provides an increase in the indicator of the integral index of economic security by 0.27–0.34 units. Optimization of card distribution contributes to increasing the efficiency of managerial decision-making (f = 8.27). It is substantiated that further implementation of digital practices into corporate culture will increase resource provision indicators by 18–22% and enhance management transparency. The results can be used in the formation of a strategy for resource provision of economic security of public administration by improving corporate culture.

Author Biographies

Yana Tsymbalenko, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Candidate of Sciences in Public Administration, Associate Professor

 

Volodymyr Koval, Charitable Organization «CHARITABLE FUND «GUARD OF THE COUNTRY»

Candidate of Military Sciences, Senior Researcher

Maksym Boiko, Classic Private University

Candidate of Economic Sciences

Department of Public Administration and Land Management

Mariia Tepliuk, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship

Anna Zimina, National University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management

Lesia Skurinevska, National Defence University of Ukraine

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher, Deputy Head of Educational and Research Center

Educational and Research Center for Defence Management

 

Andrii Blyznyuk, Kyiv University of Aviation and Information Technologies

Doctor of Public Administration, Professor

Department of Public Administration and Administration

Andrii Biliuk, Classic Private University

Candidate of Sciences in Public Administration, Associate Professor

Department of Public Administration and Land Management

Natalia Lavruk, Educational and Rehabilitation Institution of Higher Education "Kamianets-Podilskyi State Institute"

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Public Administration, Management and Inclusive Economy

Oksana Lavruk, Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management

References

  1. Collins, S., Lawford-Smith, H. (2021). We the People: Is the Polity the State? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 7 (1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.15
  2. Harutyunyan, A. (2022). Some Philosophical and Legal Problems of Qualification of Crimes Against Political Rights in Modern Legal States. Wisdom, 23 (3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.684
  3. Kolisnichenko, R., Tsumariev, M., Melnyk, N., Gorban, I., Marushko, N. (2022). Philosophical and Legal Essence of Control in Terms of Ensuring National Security. Wisdom, 23 (3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.832
  4. Kryshtanovych, M., Dragan, I., Grytsyshen, D., Sergiienko, L., Baranovska, T. (2022). The Public and Environmental Aspect of Restoring Sustainable Regional Development in the Face of the Negative Impact of Military Actions on the Territory of the Country. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17 (5), 1645–1651. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170530
  5. Pokataiev, P., Teteruk, K. Andriushchenko, A. (2023). A Biotechnological Business Incubator as an Instrument of Innovation Entrepreneurship. Recent Trends in Business and Entrepreneurial Ventures, 37–60. Available at: https://novapublishers.com/shop/recent-trends-in-business-and-entrepreneurial-ventures/
  6. Shevchuk, I. (2019). Methodological bases for assessing the state’s economic security. Law and Public Administration, 2 (2), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.32840/pdu.2-2.24
  7. Amoa-Gyarteng, K., Dhliwayo, S. (2024). Cultivating success: organizational culture’s influence on innovation and performance in SMEs. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2397070
  8. Tapia-Espinoza, N. J. (2025). Organizational culture and legitimacy: mediation of the process of knowledge sharing and knowledge creation. Cogent Business & Management, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2583742
  9. Abawa, A., Obse, H. (2024). Organizational culture and organizational performance: does job satisfaction mediate the relationship? Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2324127
  10. Adeoye, O., Ran, B. (2023). Government transparency: paradoxes and dilemmas. Public Management Review, 26 (8), 2194–2217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2181981
  11. Dinh Thanh, S., Nguyen, C. P., Duy-Tung, B., Binh, N. Q., Van, D. T. B. (2022). Spatial spillover effects of fiscal decentralization on governance and public administration quality. Regional Studies, 57 (3), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2078801
  12. Andriushchenko, K., Liezina, A., Vasylchak, S., Manylich, M., Shterma, T., Petrynyak, U. (2022). Management of the Development of the Innovative Potential of the Region. TEM Journal, 11 (1), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem111-43
  13. Tomkinson, S. (2023). Power and Public Administration: Applying a Transformative Approach to Freedom of/Access to Information Research. Public Integrity, 26 (6), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2262156
  14. Andriushchenko, K., Lavruk, V., Uliganets, S., Kovtun, V., Matviienko, H. (2019). Reputation Risk Management Companies Based on Competence Approach. TEM Journal, 8 (2), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem82-27
  15. Gao, Y., Jin, Z., Wang, K., Wang, J., Khurshid, A. (2026). Transparency, accountability, and the SDGs: A European e-governance perspective. Public Money & Management, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2629575
  16. Szedmák, B., Varga, L., Szabó, R. Z. (2025). Digital Transformation of Public Services: The Case of the Document Management Application. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2520522
  17. Liezina, A., Lavruk, A., Matviienko, H., Ivanets, I., Tseluiko, O., Kuchai, O. (2023). Impact of econometric modeling and perspectives of economic security of the cross-industry complex. Acta Innovations, 47, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.47.7
  18. Wang, Q., Zhou, Y., Alofaysan, H. (2026). New development: E-governance, public policies, and sustainability. Public Money & Management, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2614326
  19. Giacomelli, G., Micacchi, M., Micacchi, L. (2024). Performance shall not live by results alone: organizational subcultures and perceived performance in public administration. Public Money & Management, 44 (6), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2295366
  20. Andriushchenko, K., Khaletska, A., Ushenko, N., Zholnerchyk, H., Ivanets, I., Petrychuk, S., Uliganets, S. (2021). Education process digitalization and its impact on human capital of an enterprise. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24 (5), 1–9. Available at: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Education-process-digitalization-and-its-impact-on-human-capital-of-an-enterprise-1532-5806-24-5-271.pdf
  21. Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., Niftiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36 (12), 3987–4003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037
  22. Buriachenko, A., Zakhozhay, K., Liezina, A., Lysak, V. (2022). Sustainability and security of public budget of the Visegrad Group countries. Acta Innovations, 42, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.42.6
  23. Andriushchenko, A., Liezina, A., Kolybo, D., Gurina, G., Havrysh, K., Mazur, N. et al. (2026). Determining the investment attractiveness of the biohacking and bioinnovation market based on market trends in the pharmaceutical business. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1 (4 (87)), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.352711
  24. Peters, B. G., Torfing, J. (2025). Theoretical Framing of Public Administration Research. International Journal of Public Administration, 48 (5-6), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2446901
  25. Andriushchenko, K., Liezina, A., Lavruk, V., Sliusareva, L., Rudevska, V. (2022). Intelligent enterprise capital control based on Markov chain. Acta Innovations, 45, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.45.2
  26. Maestripieri, L. (2023). Women’s Involuntary Part-Time Employment and Household Economic Security in Europe. Feminist Economics, 29 (4), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2023.2251991
  27. Kondarevych, V., Andriushchenko, K., Pokotylska, N., Ortina, G., Zborovska, O., Budnyak, L. (2020). Digital Transformation of Business Processes of an Enterprise. TEM Journal, 9 (4), 1800–1808. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem94-63
  28. Gao, X., Qiu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, X. (2022). Information security investment with budget constraint and security information sharing in resource-sharing environments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 74 (6), 1520–1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096506
  29. Mekinc, J., Repnik, S. (2025). Corporate security in Spa – Slovenia case. International Journal of Spa and Wellness, 8 (2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721735.2025.2524278
  30. Cort, T., Park, S. K., Nascimento, D. (2025). Disclosure of corporate risk from socio-economic inequality. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 15 (3), 714–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2025.2452643
  31. Ikeda, E., Yamazaki, S. (2026). Economic security-defense sector nexus: Japan and India’s strategic complementarity. The Pacific Review, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2026.2646559
  32. Mun, K. G., Cai, W., Rodgers, M., Choi, S. (2023). A data-driven viable supply network for energy security and economic prosperity. International Journal of Production Research, 62 (24), 8988–9010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2254414
  33. Li, J., Wang, Y., Su, E. (2026). Digital economy and energy security risk: global impacts and mechanisms. Applied Economics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2653728
  34. Pokataiev, P., Liezina, A., Petukhova, H., Andriushchenko, A. (2022). The role of biotechnology in the development of the bioeconomy. Acta Innovations, 46, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.32933/actainnovations.46.2
  35. Pham, T. B. C., Nguyen, H. L., Vu, T. M. T., Truong, V. T. (2022). Corporate governance and earnings management struggles: responses to adapt a modern capital mobilisation in the transitional economy. Cogent Business & Management, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2108216
  36. Thi Lan Anh, P., Thi Hai Yen, D. (2025). Unpacking the moderating role of corporate governance in the foreign ownership and corporate risk-taking relationship: insights from fsQCA. Cogent Business & Management, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2468370
  37. Urtado, F., Machado Filho, C. (2024). Corporate governance in startups: a classification model for agtechs in Brazil. Cogent Business & Management, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2437149
  38. Andriushchenko, K., Datsii, O., Lavruk, O., Dmytrenko, R., Kutashev, I., Vіnіchenko, I. et al. (2021). Development of а matrix of food industry capacity for making management decisions in the formation of sustainable development of agroecosystems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (110)), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.227805
  39. Kovtun, V., Andriushchenko, K., Horbova, N., Lavruk, O., Muzychka, Y. (2020). Features of the Management Process of Ambidextrous Companies. TEM Journal, 9 (1), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem91-31
  40. Hammond, P., Opoku, M. O., Kwakwa, P. A., Berko, D. (2023). Comparison of going concern models with and without corporate governance. Cogent Business & Management, 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2234152
  41. Domina, O., Andriushchenko, K., Liezina, A., Tsymbalenko, Y., Titova, O., Kyryliuk, O., Vylgin, Y. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Formation of a Teacher’s Digital Twin in the Metaverse. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 12 (3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.12.3.169-185
  42. Saraswati, Rr. S., Yadiati, W., Suharman, H., Soemantri, R. (2024). Corporate governance, intellectual capital, and organizational culture: their influence on lean manufacturing and firm value. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2382335
  43. Haneda, S., Ono, A. (2023). Corporate culture and product innovation: evidence from a firm survey. Applied Economics Letters, 31 (21), 2312–2316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2227411
  44. Li, T., Li, Z., Tian, Z., Zhao, S. (2025). Corporate culture and R&;D activities: empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Applied Economics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2526180
  45. Eriqat, I. O. A., Tahir, M., Zulkafli, A. H. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on corporate reputation: the moderating role of national culture in financial industries of MENA region. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2391120
  46. Andriushchenko, K., Datsii, O., Aleinikova, O., Mohamed Abdulla, A., Mohammed Ali, A. (2019). Improvement of the water resources management system at the territorial level. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17 (3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.34
  47. Intara, P., Sangwichitr, K., Sattayarak, O.-A. (2024). Earnings quality and firm value: Does corporate governance matter? Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2386158
  48. Lone, R. R., Mollah, S., Yin, S., Simsek, R. (2026). Risk culture, board gender-diversity and bank risk. The European Journal of Finance, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2026.2661757
  49. Kelly, E., Kelly, C. J., MacCarthaigh, M. (2026). The legacy of ‘cash for ash’ in Northern Ireland: instrumental, cultural, and myth perspectives. Public Money & Management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2628844
  50. Mahmud, R. (2026). Citizens’ trust in public institutions in the global South: empirical evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 48 (2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2026.2615440
  51. Siemers, O., Duygulu, Ş. (2025). Intra-governmental collaborative transformation in the UK: Paving the way forward. Public Money & Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2558869
  52. Shalko, M., Domina, O., Korobko, I., Melnyk, D., Andriushchenko, A. (2024). The transformative impact of large language models in healthcare. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6 (4 (80)), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.319006
  53. Almaqtari, F. A., Farhan, N. H. S., Yahya, A. T., Al-Dalaien, B. O. A., Shamim, M. (2022). The mediating effect of IT governance between corporate governance mechanisms, business continuity, and transparency & disclosure: An empirical study of Covid-19 Pandemic in Jordan. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 32 (1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2022.2053001
Modeling of resource provision of economic security of corporate culture in public administration

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Tsymbalenko, Y., Koval, V., Boiko, M., Tepliuk, M., Zimina, A., Skurinevska, L., Blyznyuk, A., Biliuk, A., Lavruk, N., & Lavruk, O. (2026). Modeling of resource provision of economic security of corporate culture in public administration. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(4(89), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.364320

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management