Research of resistant plasticity in national security mechanism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.66264

Keywords:

national security, socio-economic system, transport and communication system, self-sufficiency, self-contained development, resistance, resistant flexibility

Abstract

Role and resistant properties importance of socio-economic system in the mechanism of national security was justified in the article. Systemic, synergetic, complex, evolutionary and scientific approaches were used to reach the goal and solve the problem. The phenomenon of resistance was revealed by the author as «genetic» property of the system, as a continuous function of it, as a mechanism to secure development. Dialectical relationship between self-sufficiency-resistant securities of socioeconomic system was highlighted in the paper. In addition, the author emphasizes importance of the resistant plasticity determining. Definition of the term is proposed, potential of plasticity of resistant individual components of the socio-economic system is characterized in the article. High level of resistant plasticity of transportation and communication systems is noted in particular. Instrumental quality of transport and communication system in self-preservation from the damaging effects of instability and ensuring national security development is substantiated. Conducted systematic and comprehensive research will lead to the complete understanding of national strategy future development.

Author Biography

Тетяна Анатоліївна Чернявська, Kherson State University, st. University, 27, Ukraine, Kherson, 73000

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Assistant Professor

Department of Social Work, Social Pedagogy and Sociology

References

  1. Sytnyk, H. (2009). Aktualni napriamy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti systemy zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy v suchasnykh umovakh derzhavotvorennia. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, 1, 42–52. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadu_2009_1_7
  2. Bilorus, O. T., Lukianenko, D. H., Honcharenko, M. O., Zlenko, V. A., Zernetska, O. L.; In: Bilorusa, O. T. (2001). Hlobalizatsiia i bezpeka rozvytku. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut svitovoi ekonomiky i mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn; Kyivskyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi universitet, 734.
  3. Vozzhenikov, A. B. (2000). Natsional'naia bezopasnost': teoriia, politika, strategiia. Moscow: NPO «MODUL», 234.
  4. Lipkan, V. A. (2003). Natsiobezpekoznavcha paradyhma. Pravo Ukrainy, 2, 120–123.
  5. Lipkan, V. A. (2002). Natsionalna bezpeka Ukrainy u svitli teorii samoorhanizatsii. Derzhava i pravo, 16, 142–148.
  6. Lipkan, V. A. (2002). Neoparadyhma natsionalnoi bezpeky. Pravo Ukrainy, 11, 19–21.
  7. Lipkan, V. A. (2003). Poniattia systemy zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. Pravo i Bezpeka, 2 (4), 57–60.
  8. Kovalskyi, V., Manachynskyi, O., Pronkin, Ye. (1994). Natsionalni interesy: zahrozy ta yikh neitralizatsiia. Viche, 7, 57–62.
  9. Poruchnyk, A. M. (2008). Natsionalnyi interes Ukrainy: ekonomichna samodostatnist u hlobalnomu vymiri. Kyiv: KNEU, 352.
  10. Buran, E. V. (2006). O samodostatochnosti. Zhurnal «Samizdat». Available: http://zhurnal.lib.ru/b/buran_e_w/sam.shtml
  11. Trofymova, V. V. (2010). Ekonomichna samodostatnist krain v epokhu hlobalnoi intehratsii. Simferopol: ViTroPrynt, 450.
  12. Trofymova, V. V. Hlobalna ekonomichna intehratsiia ta natsionalna samodostatnist: dialektyka rozvytku. Available: http://ukrmodno.com.ua/health/trofimova-v-v-globalena-ekonomichna-integraciya-ta-nacionalena/main.html
  13. Zorina, O. I. (2011). Poniattia ta sutnist «samodostatnosti» ekonomichnykh system. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 33, 85–87.
  14. Sachs, J. (2006). The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. Penguin, 416.
  15. Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World Where Differences Still Matter. Harvard Business School Press, 304.
  16. Walter, A., Sen, G. (2008). Analyzing the Global Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 296. doi:10.1515/9781400837809
  17. Sirotinin, N. N. (1981). Evoliutsiia rezistentnosti i reaktivnosti organizma. Moscow: Meditsina, 235.
  18. Sirotinin, N. N.; In: Petrov, I. R., Chernuh, A. M. (1966). Reaktivnost' i rezistentnost' organizma. Rukovodstvo po patologicheskoi fiziologii, Vol. 1, Chapter 10. Moscow: Meditsina, 346–373.
  19. Lavrov, B. A. (1951). Reaktivnost' organizma i vitamin. Sovremennye voprosy meditsinskoi nauki. Moscow: Publisher Academy of Medical Sciences, 288.
  20. Lebedev, D. D. (1960). Reaktivnost' organizma i ee znachenie v fiziologii i patologii. Moscow, 205.
  21. Avedisova, A. S. (2004). Neiroplastichnost' i patogenez depressii: novye dannye. Psihiatriia i psihofarmakoterapiia, 6 (6), 312–314.
  22. Ashmarin, I. P., Stukalov, P. V. (1996). Neirohimiia. Moscow: Institute of Biomedical Chemistry of the RAMS, 469.
  23. Kazakov, V. N. (1998). Morfofunktsional'nyi aspekt deiatel'nosti mozga i vozmozhnye mehanizmy rasprostraneniia tormozheniia v kore golovnogo mozga. Arhiv klinicheskoi i eksperimental'noi meditsiny, 7 (1), 10–14.
  24. Liapidevskii, S. S.; In: Seleverstov, V. I. (2000). Nevropatologiia. Moscow: Vlados, 384.
  25. Kostiuk, P. G. (1977). Fiziologiia tsentral'noi nervnoi sistemy. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 319.
  26. Anohin, P. K. (1979). Sistemnye mehanizmy vysshei nervnoi deiatel'nosti. Moscow: Nauka, 454.
  27. Lundborg, G. (2000). A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: Evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 25 (3), 391–414. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.4165
  28. Poo, M. (2001, January). Neurotrophins as synaptic modulators. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2 (1), 24–32. doi:10.1038/35049004
  29. Chernyavskaya, T.; In: Shvets, I. Yu. (2013). Samodostatnist yak metodolohichna osnova efektyvnoho ta zbalansovanoho rozvytku transportno-komunikatyvnoi systemy. Formuvannia suchasnykh mekhanizmiv rozvytku innovatsiinoi sfery ekonomiky. Symferopol: DIAIPI, 117–125.
  30. Chernyavskaya, T. (2015). Strategic Directions of Development in Transport-Communication System of Ukraine in the Context of National Security and Sufficincy. Economics Bulletin, 3, 68–75.
  31. Chernyavskaya, T. (2015). Conceptual Approaches to Structural and Functional Organization of Transport and Communication System. Problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva, Vol. 2, № 3 (10), 112–121.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-29

How to Cite

Чернявська, Т. А. (2016). Research of resistant plasticity in national security mechanism. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(6(28), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.66264

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 6(28) (2016): Development of productive forces and regional economy. Economic cybernetics

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Тетяна Анатоліївна Чернявська

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.