Approach development to the expert committees formation for the assessment of teams of high-tech projects performers

Authors

  • Олена Ігорівна Шостак N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, 61070, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-3108

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74518

Keywords:

expert committee, team of project performers, high-tech project, innovative enterprise, competence

Abstract

The object of research in this work – activities of innovative enterprises to implement high-tech projects (HTP). Subject of research – decision support tools on the formation of alternative teams of HTP performers as one of the key stages of forming teams of HTP performers at innovation enterprises is the selection of experts for collective assessment of applicants in the project team.

The essence of the proposed approach is to create a sequence of stages for formation of the expert committee: the choice of a rational number of the expert committee members; generate a list of possible candidates for experts; creating preliminary list of the expert committee members and assessment of their competence; a final commission of experts indicating the competence of its members.

Research results:

  •  methodology for determining the limit values (upper and lower) of expert committee size and assessment of the total number of experts in the committee;
  •  tool for determining the competence of individual members and expert committee as a whole, it is a special verbal-numeric scale and range of analytical expressions;
  • four-phased approach to the formation of expert committees, which is a part of the management of high-tech projects for innovative enterprises.

Use the proposed approach to the formation of expert committees for assessing the quality of teams of high-tech projects performers will enable enterprises to increase the efficiency of these projects by reducing the level of uncertainty about competence compliance and personal qualities of performers to complexity of the project.

Author Biography

Олена Ігорівна Шостак, N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, 61070

Postgraduate student

Department of management

References

  1. Baranov, M. N., Saakova, L. V., Shchmatko, A. D. (2011). Rasvitie i gosudarstvennaia podderzhka malogo innovatsionnogo predprinimatel'stva v nauchno-tehnicheskoi sfere. St. Petersburg: SSTU, 131.
  2. Kyzym, M. O., Matiushenko, I. Yu., Shostak, I. V. (2012). Perspektyvy rozvytku informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh tekhnolohii i shtuchnoho intelektu v ekonomikakh krain svitu ta Ukrainy. Kharkiv: VD «INZhEK», 492.
  3. Gavva, V. N. (2004). Otsenka potentsiala predpriiatiia i otrasli. Kharkiv: NAU «KhAI», 287.
  4. Zhilina, A. I. (2002). Etalonnaia model' professional'noi kompetentnosti menedzhera (rukovoditelia). St. Petersburg: IOV RAO, 228.
  5. Kriuchkovskii, V. V. (2009). Formalisatsiia protsessov formirovaniia ekspertnoi gruppy dlia ekspertnogo otsenivaniia. Vestnik HNTU, 3 (36), 205–207.
  6. Simniaia, I. A. (2003). Kliuchevye kompetentsii – novaia paradigma resul'tata obrasovaniia. Vysshchee obrasovanie segodnia, 5, 34–42.
  7. Kitaev, N. N. (1975). Gruppovye ekspertnye otsenki. Moscow: Snanie, 64.
  8. Kiseleva, N. E., Pankova, L. A., Shchneiderman, M. V. (1975). Strukturnyi podhod k analisu i obrabotke dannyh ekspertnogo oprosa. Avtomatika i telemehanika, 4, 64–70.
  9. Il'ina, E. P. (2007). Otsenka i ispol'sovanie pokasatelei kachestva ekspertnogo reshcheniia problemy. Problemy programmirovaniia, 1, 38–49.
  10. Kovalenko, I. I., Shchved, A. V. (2013). Ekspertnye tehnologii podderzhki priniatiia reshchenii. Nikolaev: Ilion, 216.
  11. Orlov, A. I. (2002). Ekspertnye otsenki. Moscow: Eksamen, 31.
  12. Koshchelev, O. S., Leushchin, I. O., Fedorov, O. V. (2011). Upravlenie proektami. Moscow: KNORUS, 254.
  13. Lukicheva, L. I., Egorychev, D. N. (2009). Upravlencheskie reshcheniia. Moscow: Omega-L, 383.
  14. Margolin, E. (2006). Metodika obrabotki dannyh ekspertnogo oprosa. Poligrafiia, 5, 14–16.
  15. Orlov, A. I. (2011). Organisatsionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. Teoriia priniatiia reshchenii. Moscow: KNORUS, 568.
  16. Petrov, A. Yu. (2010). Integral'naia metodika otsenki kommercheskogo potentsiala investitsionnogo produkta. Moscow: Moskovskii pechatnik, 23.
  17. Syshchikova, E. N. (2010). Teoriia i metody povyshcheniia effektivnosti sistem upravleniia na predpriiatii. Voronezh: GOUVPO VGTU, 206.
  18. Shchmerlin, D. S., Dubrovskii, S. A. (2001). Ekspertnye otsenki: metody i primeneniia. Moscow: EKSPO, 228.
  19. Beshchelev, S. D., Gurvich, F. G. (1980). Matematichesko-statisticheskie metody ekspertnyh otsenok. Moscow: Statistika, 263.
  20. Winiewski, M. (1997). Quantitative Methods for Decision Makers. London: Pitman Publ., 576.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-26

How to Cite

Шостак, О. І. (2016). Approach development to the expert committees formation for the assessment of teams of high-tech projects performers. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(30), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74518

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2(30) (2016): Information technologies. Mathematical modeling

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Олена Ігорівна Шостак

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.