Intellectualization of social-economic processes: intellectual capital

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74840

Keywords:

intellectual capital, economic potential, intellectualization of development, social-economic system

Abstract

Social-economic society, regardless of their levels: macro-, meso- and micro- is historically structured as a complex self-regulating social-economic hypersystem with its constant reality, regardless of the uncertainty in which there is activity of biological energetic subjects takes place on the basis of personal creativity.

This is in an adequate degree applies to the producer and to the consumer: the worker, employee, manager, or someone else's consumer of products, in general, for all entities making up this complex socio-economic system, as a living organism, which gives grounds to consider it as the intellectual potential of the society.

It is conceptually proved the necessity of taking into account the features of modern economic laws of development – intellectual potential as a factor of intellectualization of social-economic processes.

It is suggested that the conflictogene of social and economic development cycle of complex self-regulating social-economic systems is intellectual capital.

Insufficiency of theoretical contexts of development of such systems, which justifies the design problems of the objective function of economic policy, is proved.

On the basis of the results of research, discussions and practical developments authors conceptually justify mentality directions of intellectualization of processes at the meso-level as absolute principles of economic behavior during the realization of the intellectual potential, turning it into intellectual capital.

 

Author Biographies

Sergei Voit, State Company «Yuzhny Machine-Building Plant named after A. M. Makarov», Krivorozhskaya Str., 1, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49006

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Senior Scientific Researcher, Academician of the Economic Sciences Academy (Ukraine)

Sergei Holod, Alfred Nobel University Dnipropetrovsk, Naberezhna Sicheslavska str., 18 Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Assistant Professor, Pro-rector

References

  1. Edvinsson, L., Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Business, 412.
  2. Voit, S., Holod, S. (2015). Strategy of survival and self-reproduction of complex self-managing social-economic systems in mesolevel. Nauka i Studia, 14 (145), 23–32.
  3. Inozemtsev, V. (2000). Modern post-industrial society: nature, contradictions, prospects. Moscow: Logos, 304.
  4. Tkachenko, V. (2007). Intellectual potential in the basis of sensational strategies. Economic Bulletin of Donbas, 2 (8), 107–116.
  5. Tkachenko, V. (2008). Intellectual potential in the base of production and production relations development. Dnipropetrovsk: DUAN, 274.
  6. Holod, S. (2013). Improvement of strategic management according to position on a market. European vector of economic development, 2 (15), 187–204.
  7. Tkachenko, V., Holod, B., Rohoza, M. et al.; In: Tkachenko, V. (2010). Technological imperative of development of intellectual potential of Ukraine. Book 4. Initiative intellectual creative activities in the base of development. Dnipropetrovsk: Monolyt, 359.
  8. Tkachenko, V., Holod, S. (2015). Concept of regulating parameters of development in terms of uncertainty and instability. Ural Scientific Herald, 20 (151), 22–33.
  9. Voit, S., Holod, S. (2015). Factors of stabilization of activity at the mesolevel and criteria of evaluation indicators. Stredoevropsky vestnik pro vedu a vyzkum, 10 (23), 63–72.
  10. Tkachenko, V. (2008). Epistomological skepticism in the base of economic policy in Ukraine. Dnipropetrovsk: Monolyt, 264.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-26

How to Cite

Voit, S., & Holod, S. (2016). Intellectualization of social-economic processes: intellectual capital. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(6(30), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74840