The project management of the building structure reengineering by the limits in all functional areas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.79982

Keywords:

reengineering in the building, project management, resource limits, functional areas

Abstract

Management of repair and restore of the building objects is the object of this research. The main disadvantage of the object is a process management according to planned in advance, before the start, project network, which doesn’t take into account in the process of repairing and restoring the numerous effects of internal and external environments in the process of repair and restore that slowing and expensing the process and deteriorating the quality of its results.

At the same time it is shown that repair and restore of the building structures are almost always is their reengineering, has a unique and performed in conditions of significant restrictions on resources in all functional areas that makes this kind of activity as the project by definition and its management – project management.

A reengineering management method for the building is developed. It is based on the project approach in resource-limited conditions. The method allowed to evaluate and predict the reengineering in terms of not only purely technological constraints, but also taking into account the turbulent environmental impact in all functional areas.

A «REBUS» system for optimization and support of design decisions, as well as reducing the cost and timing of project work, was developed on the basis of the proposed method. It was implemented in Odessa «Geomoras» LTD (Ukraine) with the positive technical and economic effect. This effect was achieved by replacing an open-loop reengineering management (planned – realized) to the closed – loop (planned – realized under constant monitoring and intervention), which allowed to quickly predict, prevent and eliminate the consequences of all possible risks that accompany a real unique reengineering.

Author Biographies

Катерина Вікторівна Колесникова, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Science, Professor

Department of information technology in mechanical engineering

Дарія Анатоліївна Монова, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD student

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

Алла Володимирівна Торопенко, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Candidate of Technical Science, Assistant Professor

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering 

Олексій Вікторович Торопенко, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD student

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

Абу Шена Осама Мохаммед Алі, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD student

Department of Oilgas and chemical mechanical engineering

References

  1. Novitskii, N. I. (2004). Organizatsiia i planirovanie proizvodstva. Minsk: Novoe znanie, 256.
  2. Tsehovoi, A. F., Vinnitskaia, M. A., Klimova, T. G., Karlinskaia, M. A. (2010). Upravlenie proektami: osnovy teorii i praktiki. Almaty: Akbar, 200.
  3. Karenov, K. M. (2012). Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy optimizatsii setevyh modelei po vremeni. Vestnik KarGU. Available: http://articlekz.com/article/5878. Last accessed: 11.06.2015.
  4. Bushueva, N. S. (2007). Modeli i metody proaktivnogo upravleniia programmami organizatsionnogo razvitiia. Kyiv: Naukovii svіt, 200.
  5. Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S. (2005). Sovremennye podhody k razvitiiu metodologii upravleniia proektami. Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva, 1, 5–19.
  6. Bushueva, N. S., Yaroshenko, Yu. F., Yaroshenko, R. F. (2010). Upravlinnia proektamy ta prohramamy orhanizatsiinoho rozvytku. Kyiv: Sammyt-Knyha, 200.
  7. Nesterenko, S. A., Purich, D. A., Stanovskii, A. A., Monova, D. A. (2015). SAPR reinzhiniringa mehanicheskih sistem v ekspluatatsii. Suchasni tekhnolohii v mashynobuduvanni, 1 (25), 109–115.
  8. Upravlenie kachestvom produktsii. Instrumenty i metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 5.4. Reinzhiniring – metodologiia radikal'nogo uluchsheniia. (2005). Bol'shaia biblioteka. Available: http://biglibrary.ru/category38/book135/part41/. Last accessed: 25.09.2016.
  9. Remont. (2016, May 4). Wikipedia. Available: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%E5%EC%EE%ED%F2. Last accessed: 14.06.2015.
  10. Apgreid. (2012). Slovoborg. Available: http://slovoborg.su/definition/апгрейд
  11. Posledovatel'nost' proizvodstva rabot i vozvedeniia zdanii. Tehnologiia vozvedeniia zdanii i sooruzhenii. Available: http://tvzis.ru/gl2/index2.html. Last accessed: 11.02.2013.
  12. Bushuev, S. D. (2005). Razvitie sistem znanii i tehnologii upravleniia proektami. Upravlenie proektami i programmami, 2, 20–25.
  13. Rukovodstvo k Svodu znanii po upravleniiu proektami (Rukovodstvo PMBOK®). Ed. 3. (2004). USA: Project Management Institute, 388.
  14. Fleming, Q. W., Hoppelman, J. M. (1996). Earned Value Project Management. N.Y.: Project Management Institute, 141.
  15. Vaisman, V. A., Gogunskii, V. D., Rudenko, S. V. (2005). Formirovanie struktur organizatsionnogo upravleniia proektami. Avtomatika. Avtomatizatsiia. Elektrotehnicheskie kompleksy i sistemy (AAEKS), 2 (16), 84–88.
  16. Indelicato, G. (2009). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK®guide), fourth edition. Project Management Journal, Vol. 40, № 2, 104–104. doi:10.1002/pmj.20125
  17. Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., Zaharov, A. M. (2006). Modeli i metody strategicheskogo razvitiia bystrorastushchih organizatsii. Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva, 1 (17), 5–13.
  18. Flipborg, B., Bruzelius, N., Rotengatter, V. (2005). Megaproekty: istoriia nedostroev, pererashodov i prochih riskov stroitel'stva. Moscow: Vershina, 207–219.
  19. GOST 53778-2010. Zdaniia i sooruzheniia. Pravila obsledovaniia i monitoringa tehnicheskogo sostoianiia. Kodeks. Elektronnyi fond pravovoi i normativno-tehnicheskoi dokumentatsii. Available: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-53778-2010
  20. Kosko, B. (1994). Fuzzy systems as universal approximators. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 43, № 11, 1329–1333. doi:10.1109/12.324566
  21. Kandasami, W. B. V., Smarandachhe, F. (2003). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Neutrosophjc Cognitive Maps. Xiquan Ed, Phoenix, 213.
  22. Upravlenie po Ogranicheniiam. (30.03.2013). BusinessTuning. Available: http://www.businesstuning.ru/op/219-upravlenie-po-ogranicheniyam.html. Last accessed: 11.08.2016.
  23. Monova, D. A., Perperi, A. A., Shvets, P. S. (2011). Kompleksnyi geneticheskii algoritm. Odes’kyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 1 (35), 176–180.
  24. Shvets, P. S., Stanovskyi, O. L., Monova, D. A. (2011). Metod kompleksnoho henetychnoho alhorytmu optymizatsii system z obiednanymy parametramy. Materialy XVIII Mizhnarodnoi konferentsii z avtomatychnoho upravlinnia «Avtomatyka/Automatics – 2011», 28-30 veresnia 2011 r. Lviv: NU «Lvivska politekhnika», 67–68.
  25. Prokopovich, I. V., Shvets, P. S., Stanovskaia, I. I., Duhanina, M. A. (2012). Adaptivnyi geneticheskii algoritm dlia «miagkih» evoliutsionnyh vychislenii. Odes’kyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 2 (39), 218–224.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-29

How to Cite

Колесникова, К. В., Монова, Д. А., Торопенко, А. В., Торопенко, О. В., & Алі, А. Ш. О. М. (2016). The project management of the building structure reengineering by the limits in all functional areas. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(2(31), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.79982

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2(31) (2016): Systems and control processes. Information and control systems. Technology Transfer in the Transport Industry

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Алла Володимирівна Торопенко, Катерина Вікторівна Колесникова, Дарія Анатоліївна Монова, Олексій Вікторович Торопенко, Алі Осама Мохаммед Абу Шена

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.