Analysis of the machine-building sector in Ukraine and generation of the factor characteristics for the evaluation of the enterprise management effectiveness

Authors

  • Natalia Kolinko Institute of Business and Advanced Technologies, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Str. Gorbachevekogo, 18, Lviv, Ukraine, 79044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-4801

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.81465

Keywords:

machine-building, management, industrial production index, external and internal factors

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the machine-building sector in the structure of the industrial complex of Ukraine. The statistical analysis of its dynamics allows to form a number of factors of external and internal environment, which are to form the basis for multifactorial regression models aimed to evaluate the efficiency of theenterprise management.The statistics on the innovative activity of the machine-building sector in Ukraine and Lviv region, according to the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, helps to assess economic conditions for innovative activity of the enterprises.

The staged sequence of research of the external and internal factors influence on the economic results of the machine-building enterprise are revealed as a result of the initial data analysis. The conducted research will lay in the basis of the numerical model, aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the machine-building enterprise management.

Author Biography

Natalia Kolinko, Institute of Business and Advanced Technologies, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Str. Gorbachevekogo, 18, Lviv, Ukraine, 79044

Senior Lecturer

Department of Economics and Marketing

References

  1. Tkacheva, N. P. (2011). Mashynobuduvannia ukrainy: suchasnyi stan taperspektyvy rozvytkukonkurentnykh perevah. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI», 25, 138–150.
  2. Ivanov, O. O., Pietrikov, A. V. Perspektyvy vprovadzhennia avtomatyzovanykh system proektuvannia i upravlinnia v mashynobuduvanni. Available: http://intkonf.org/ivanov-o-o-petrikov-a-v-perspektivi-vprovadzhennya-avtomatizovanih-sistem-proektuvannya-i-upravlinnya-v-mashinobuduvanni//
  3. Pererva, P. H., Romanchyk, T. V. (2011). Synerhetychnyi efekt benchmarkinhu konkurentnykh perevah. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 4 (1), 55–66.
  4. Dziuba, M. I. (2011). Analiz stanu mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy na zovnishnikh ta vnutrishnikh rynkakh. Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna Internet-konferentsiia «Formuvannia ta otsinka efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia mekhanizmiv upravlinnia diialnistiu pidpryiemstv». Available: http://mev-hnu.at.ua/load/2-1-0-91
  5. Zahorianska, O. L. (2011). Problemy stanovlennia konkurentospromozhnosti mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh umovakh rozvytku. Efektyvna ekonomika, 6. Available: http://economy.nayka.com.ua/index.php?nomer_data=6&year_data=2011
  6. Landak, V. (2007). Mehanizm formirovaniia konkurentnyh preimushchestv Ukrainy v mashinostroitel'nom komplekse. Problemy razvitiia vneshneekonomicheskih sviazei i privlecheniia inostrannyh investitsii: regional'nyi aspekt, 2, 16–23.
  7. Porter, M. (1993). International competition. Мoscow: The International relations, 896.
  8. Romanko, O. P. (2009). Chynnyky formuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti mashynobudivnoho pidpryiemstva. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 3, 113–125.
  9. Drucker, P. (1999). The Practice of Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, 399 p.
  10. Hagen, E. (1962). On the Theory of Social Change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 127.
  11. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, 327.
  12. Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 365.
  13. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

Downloads

Published

2016-09-29

How to Cite

Kolinko, N. (2016). Analysis of the machine-building sector in Ukraine and generation of the factor characteristics for the evaluation of the enterprise management effectiveness. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(4(31), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.81465