Formation of service and resource stability conditions of urban public passenger transport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.86432Keywords:
sustainability, urban public passenger transport, sustainability area, service and resource conditionsAbstract
Service and resource parameters of urban public passenger transport operation are dominant for formation of its sustainability from the standpoint of internal and external processes. The sustainability of urban public passenger transport reflects its properties to keep under the influence of internal and external influences for a long time, which is correlated with time and changing the system, processes of its homeostatic equilibrium state, structure, nature of operation and to ensure the effective functioning of the urban environment. Its sustainability is achieved by forming reaction responses to influence, which aims to compensate their negative impact. The source of the formation of such compensatory actions is reserves of its internal (transport resources) and external resources (transport network resources). Formation of compensatory actions to influence must provide the appropriate level of its operation results of urban public passenger transport. Synthesis of the requirement to provide compensation of resource needs and performance characteristics helps to define the conditions for achieving sustainability of functional processes of urban public passenger transport.
The form of the boundaries of acceptable sustainability parameters of urban public passenger transport is revealed from the standpoint of service and resource characteristics of its operation. The sustainability scheme of functional processes of urban public passenger transport is reflected conditions and principles of sustainable development of urban environments and allows to assess sustainability degree using an available form of their accounting.
References
- Vdovychenko, V., Nagornyy, Y. (2016). Formation of methodological levels of assessing city public passenger transport efficiency. Eastern-European Journal Of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3(81)), 44–51. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71687
- Kubey, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the Quality of Life: How Viewing Shapes Everyday Experience. Routledge, 296. doi:10.4324/9780203812266
- Dolnicar, S., Yanamandram, V., Cliff, K. (2012). The contribution of vacations to quality of life. Annals of Tourism Research, 39 (1), 59–83. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2011.04.015
- Bobylev, S. N., Kudriavtseva, O. V., Solovieva, S. V. (2014). Indikatory ustoichivogo razvitiia dlia gorodov. Ekonomika regiona, 3, 101–109.
- Steg, L., Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13 (1), 59–69. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.003
- Metz, D. H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy, 7 (2), 149–152. doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00004-4
- Redman, L., Friman, M., Garling, T., Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119–127. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005
- Abramovych, B. M. et al. (2002). Transportne obsluhovuvannia naselennia yak faktor staloho rozvytku mista. Avtomobilist Ukrainy, 3, 11–13.
- Samchuk, G. (2016). Using sustainable development principles to assess the efficiency of transport interchanges functioning. Automobile Transport, 38, 13–20.
- Harchenko, O. I. (2016). Otsenka parametrov, harakterizuiushchih ustoichivoe razvitie zheleznyh dorog. Transportnye sistemy i tehnologii perevozok, 11, 67–71.
- Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G. (2012). Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. European Transport, 51 (3), 1–21.
- Mihyeon Jeon, C., Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11 (1), 31–50. doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:1(31)
- Yelahin, Yu. V. (2012). Problemy zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku suspilnoho transportu ta suspilni transportni vytraty. Visnyk ekonomichnoho transportu ta promyslovosti, 35, 254–256.
- Manaugh, K., Badami, M. G., El-Geneidy, A. M. (2015). Integrating social equity into urban transportation planning: A critical evaluation of equity objectives and measures in transportation plans in North America. Transport Policy, 37, 167–176. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.013
- Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A., Pregl, M. (2007). Indicators to assess sustainability of transport activities. Part 1: Review of the Existing Transport Sustainability Indicators Initiatives and Development of an Indicator Set to Assess Transport Sustainability Performance. Italy: European Communities, 59. doi:10.2788/54736
- Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, A. A., Guensler, R. L. (2010). Evaluating Plan Alternatives for Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4 (4), 227–247. doi:10.1080/15568310902940209
- Vdovychenko, V. (2014). Otsinka resursnykh mozhlyvostei miskoho pasazhyrskoho transportu. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Dnipropetrovskoho natsionalnoho universytetu zaliznychnoho transportu imeni akademika V. Lazariana. Transportni systemy ta tekhnolohii perevezen, 8, 35–39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Володимир Олексійович Вдовиченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
