Using of virtualized IT-infrastructure under normal operation of automation systems of technological objects

Authors

  • Петро Андрійович Вавулін National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Prospect Peremogy 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-2262
  • Тетяна Владиславівна Бойко National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Prospect Peremogy 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-8055

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.92972

Keywords:

automation system, IT infrastructure virtualization, hypervisor, thin client

Abstract

Taking into account the global trends and experience of implementation of modern information technologies in production processes, with the aim of updating and increasing the competitiveness of Ukrainian industrial complexes, the issues and methods for using of hardware and software and technological solutions in the field of virtualization are considered.

The main method of research is computer simulation – simulation of real automation systems (including server component) using the tools of virtualization (Microsoft Hyper V). The essence of the method is creation of a virtual environment (infrastructure), including primary and backup server with process control system and workstations. Virtual machines of automation systems are fully meet their physical analogues by heir characteristics.

The ways of using of traditional automation systems, which are deployed on the basis of virtualization platform Hyper V, are considered. The main way of using of traditional software automation is their deployment on the basis of server operating system with support for one of the many virtualization technologies, such as: MS Hyper V, VMWare VSphere, Citrix Xen Server, and others.

An opportunity of practical operation of automation systems on the basis of virtualized hardware and software server complex with the thin clients as workstations is proved for Experion PKS system and Honeywell C200 controller. The process control system is deployed in a virtualized environment on the basis of server (Windows Server 2012 R2) and normal (Windows 10) operating systems.

The possible positive effect of implementation of modern IT infrastructure for technological objects is also analyzed. It lays in the fact of theoretically increase of fault tolerance level, practical simplification of system administration, and creation of bank for backup of virtual machines.

This result is associated with a more rational and efficient use of capabilities of modern computer systems (CPU and RAM), data storage systems (using of RAID hard drives) and software.

Author Biographies

Петро Андрійович Вавулін, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Prospect Peremogy 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Postgraduate

Department of Cybernetics of Chemical Technology Processes

Тетяна Владиславівна Бойко, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Prospect Peremogy 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

PhD, Associate Professor, Acting Head of Department

Department of Cybernetics of Chemical Technology Processes

References

  1. Haeberlen, T., Dupre, L. (2012, December). Cloud Computing Benefits, risks and recommendations for information security. European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA). Available: https://resilience.enisa.europa.eu/cloud-security-and-resilience/publications/cloud-computing-benefits-risks-and-recommendations-for-information-security/at_download/file
  2. Bychenok, M. M., Ivaniuta, S. P., Yakovliev, Ye. O.; Institute for National Security of the National Security and Defense of Ukraine. (2008). Ryzyky zhyttiediialnosti u pryrodno-tekhnohennomu seredovyshchi. Kyiv, 160.
  3. Bondarenko, S. H., Skoretskyi, D. O. (2016). Computer-microprocessor system of technological processes control. Kompiuterne modeliuvannia v khimii i tekhnolohiiakh ta systemakh staloho rozvytku – KMKhT-2016: zbirnyk naukovykh statei Piatoi mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, 18-20 travnia 2016 roku, m. Kyiv. Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», 50–56.
  4. Vavulin, P., Boyko, T. (2016). Analysis of algorithm for estimating distribution functions of random variables for the prediction of technogenic risk. Technology Audit And Production Reserves, 2(3(28)), 17–23. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2016.66754
  5. Sinnamon, R. M., Andrews, J. D. (1996). Quantitative Fault Tree Analysis Using Binary Decision Diagrams. Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises, 30 (8), 1051–1071.
  6. Galante, E., Bordalo, D., Nobrega, M. (2014). Risk Assessment Methodology: Quantitative HazOp. Journal of Safety Engineering, 3 (2), 31–36. doi:10.5923/j.safety.20140302.01
  7. Saguy, I. S. (2016). Challenges and opportunities in food engineering: Modeling, virtualization, open innovation and social responsibility. Journal of Food Engineering, 176, 2–8. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.07.012
  8. Kertesz, A., Kecskemeti, G., Brandic, I. (2014). An interoperable and self-adaptive approach for SLA-based service virtualization in heterogeneous Cloud environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 32, 54–68. doi:10.1016/j.future.2012.05.016
  9. Babiceanu, R. F., Seker, R. (2016). Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Computers in Industry, 81, 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004
  10. Tiurin, V. A. (2006). Avtomatizirovannye sistemy upravleniia tehnologicheskimi protsessami. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Academy of Forestry Engineering, 153.
  11. Hegazy, T., Hefeeda, M. (2015). Industrial Automation as a Cloud Service. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26 (10), 2750–2763. doi:10.1109/tpds.2014.2359894
  12. Chandramouli, R. (2014). Analysis of Protection Options for Virtualized Infrastructures in Infrastructure as a Service Cloud. Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing, GRIDs, and Virtualization. Venice, Italy, 37–43.
  13. Menon, A., Cox, A. L., Zwaenepoel, W. (2006). Optimizing Network Virtualization in Xen. In Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX’06 Annual Technical Conference. USENIX Association. Available: https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/usenix06/tech/menon/menon_html/paper.html
  14. Hashizume, K., Rosado, D. G., Fernandez-Medina, E., Fernandez, E. B. (2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 4 (5), 15–28. doi:10.1186/1869-0238-4-5
  15. Medvedev, R., Sanginova, O., Evtushenko, A., Merduh, S. (2010). Software and hardware solution to control the water chemistry of the second circuit plant. Eastern-European Journal Of Enterprise Technologies, 2(10(44)), 33–36. Available: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2775
  16. Balaji, P., Wu, J., Kurc, T., Catalyurek, U., Panda, D. K., Saltz, J. (2003). Impact of high performance sockets on data intensive applications. High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium On. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 1–10. doi:10.1109/hpdc.2003.1210013

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Вавулін, П. А., & Бойко, Т. В. (2017). Using of virtualized IT-infrastructure under normal operation of automation systems of technological objects. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(2(33), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.92972

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Original Research