Methodological foundations of theoretical analysis of Chinese economic development model

Authors

  • Andrii Grymaliuk Odessa Trade and Economics Institute of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Prodan Odessa Trade and Economics Institute of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine
  • Olha Gura Odessa Trade and Economics College of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-4747

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.2-3(63-64).2017.7-14

Keywords:

Chinese model, categorical analysis, economic theory, productive forces, industrial relations, volitional relationship, conformity law, subject-object dependence

Abstract

The article substantiates that when commodity-capitalist relations of production are deliberately used by society for development of productive forces, they objectively act as productive forces of society while maintaining their materiality and objectivity. The case when the society uses relations of production just as the individual subject consciously uses means of production is analyzed. China’s modern economy is studied as the most extensive example of applying this principle in practice.

Author Biographies

Andrii Grymaliuk, Odessa Trade and Economics Institute of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Head of Economic Theories Department

Tetiana Prodan, Odessa Trade and Economics Institute of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Economic Theories Department, Dean of Finance and Economics Faculty

Olha Gura, Odessa Trade and Economics College of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Director

References

Berger, M. V. (2009). China’s economic strategy [Ekonomicheskaya strategiya Kitaya], FORUM, Мoskva, 560 s. [in Russian]

Krasilnikov, D., Sivintseva O. (2016). New state management in the People’s Republic of China: a conservative version of administrative transformations [Novyy gosudarstvennyyi menedzhment v KNR: konservativnaya versiya administrativnykh preobrazovaniy], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, No. 12, s. 85–95 [in Russian]

Mikheev, V., Chzhe, S. (2016). China: the regime of personal power and the new five-year-plan [Kitay: rezhym lichnoy vlasti i novaya pyatiletka], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, No. 12, s. 5–16 [in Russian]

Lukonin, S. (2016). China: new development trends at the turn of 2015–2016 years [Kitay: novye trendy razvitiya na rubezhe 2015–2016 gg.], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, No. 12, s. 24–34 [in Russian]

Mikheev, V., Lukonin, S., Jeh, S. (2015). Multivariance: Xi Jinping’s big strategic answer [Mnogovariantnost: bolshoy strategicheskiy otvet Si Tszinpina], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, No. 12, s. 5–14 [in Russian]

Mozias, P. (2015). «New normality» of Chinese economy [«Novaia normalnost» kitayskoy ekonomiki], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, No. 12, s. 15–29 [in Russian]

Kazarinova, O. V. (2015). Economic problems in China [Ekonomicheskie problemy v Kitae], Olimp-Biznes, Мoskva, 287 s. [in Russian]

Lin, Chzhou (2012). Chinese miracle: economic reform, development strategy [Kitayskoe chudo: ekonomicheskaya reforma, strategiya razvitiya], IDV RAN, Мoskva, 375 s. [in Russian]

Avdokushin, E. F. (2007). Theoretical basis of economic reform in PRC [Teoreticheskie osnovy ekonomicheskoy reformy v KNR], Institut vostokovedeniia RAN, Мoskva, 287 s. [in Russian]

Zveriakov, M. I. (2016). The lessons of market transformation in Ukraine [Uroki rynochnoy transformatsii v Ukraine], Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 8, s. 7–25 [in Russian]

Geiets, V. M., Grytsenko, A. A. (2013). The way out of the crisis [Vykhid z kryzy], Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 6, s. 4–26 [in Ukrainian]

Geiets, V. M. (2014). Qualitative changes in the economy of Ukraine is required [Yakisni zminy v ekonomitsi Ukrainy ye nahalnymy?], Visnyk natsionalnogo banku Ukrainy, No. 4 (218),

s. 5–9 [in Ukrainian]

Zveriakov, M. I. (2013). In search out from a crisis [U poshukakh vykhodu z kryzy], Ekonomika Ukrainy, No. 8, s. 4–21 [in Ukrainian]

Zveriakov, M. I. (2012). The national economic system: problems of theory [Natsionalna ekonomichna systema: problemy teorii], Astroprint, Odessa, 320 s. [in Ukrainian]

Zhdanova, L. L. (2014). Recovery and capital accumulation: theory, methodology, economic policy [Vidnovlennіa i nahromadzhennia kapitalu: teoriia, metodolohiia, ekonomichna polityka], Astroprynt, Odessa, 296 s. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2017-08-19

Issue

Section

Economic theory and history of economic thought