Суверенні держави перед викликами глобалізації: аналіз сучасних концепцій

Ірина Кресіна, Ірина Алєксєєнко

Анотація


The authors examine the national states development scenarios on the basis of two tendencies – the world government nascence and strengthening of the nation state. The ideas about inevitable formation to the 2000 year of the «world state» in the form of conflict-free and just united society of humanism in 1990-years failed. The possibilities of passing to more humane, just and intelligent society changed to the scenarios of split to parts civilization, contradictions between which were practically impossible to solve.

By the end of XX century the determinative feature in investigation of the further existence of a sovereign state investigation becomes an inconsistency of the globalization process, which, despite expectations, at one time integrates and disjoins nations.     

 The 1990s witnessed, that within global governance of the continuous "Shift of power" from governments of nation states to some new supranational structure of international management is not observed. Rather we talk about fundamentally new tendency of world development: at the global level both states and transnational formations own “the part” of power.

 The capital flows, which are consistently increasing, and products crossing national borders, making them more and more transparent, demand creation of coordinating bodies at the supranational level, but not as a shape of a "world government", but as collective actions of governments of several states. This model propsed by German political scientist W. Beck, is based on the idea of transnational state, namely community of states.

 The process of globalization provides arguments for supporters of the traditional theory of political realism, who claim, that in future development scenarios the main parts, as previously, belong to strong states and their nation interests, strength of which will be only increasing due to economic integration. The debates are kept only about whom in XXI century the leadership belongs to - traditional Western centers of power or East which grows stronger.


Ключові слова


the nation state; the transnational state; sovereignty; globalization; world government

Повний текст:

PDF

Пристатейна бібліографія ГОСТ


  1. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций и переустройство мирового порядка / С. Хантингтон // Pro et Contra. – 1997. – № 2. – С. 131–158.
  2. Toffler A. War and Anti-War / A. Toffler. – N.Y. : Blackwell Publishers, 1992. – 245 р.
  3. Wallace W. The Sharing of Sovereignty: The European Paradox / W. Wallace // Political Stuies. – 2009. – Vol. 47. – № 3. – P. 503–521.
  4. Mack A. What is human security? / A. Mack // Special Issue of Security Dialogue. – 2008. – Vol. 35. – P. 348–360.
  5. Murphy C. N. Global governance: poorly done and poorly understood / C. N. Murphy // Intern. affairs. – L., 2000. – Vol. 76, № 4. – Р. 654–794.
  6. Бек У. Что такое глобализация? / У. Бек ; [пер. с нем. А. Григорьева и В. Седельника]. – М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. – 304 с.
  7. Rosenau J. N. New Dimension of Security: The Interaction of Globalizing and Localizing Dynamics / J. N. Rosenau // Security Dialogue. – 1994. – Vol. 25, September. – P. 215–292.
  8. Albi A. EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe / A. Albi. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 274 p.
  9. Falk R. The Changing Structure of International Law / R. Falk // International Law : A Contemporary Perspective, 1985. – 234 р.
  10. MacCormick N. Questioning Sovereignty. Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth / N. MacCormick. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007. – 236 p.
  11. Modelski G. The Long and Short of Global politics in the 21 century / G. Modelski, K. W. Thompson // Int. Studies Review. – 2005. – № 2. – P. 121–245.
  12. Dunn J. Introduction: Crisis of the nation state? / J. Dunn // Contemporary crisis of the nation-state / [ed. by J. Dunn]. – Oxford etc., 2005. – P. 3–15.
  13. Суверенитет в условиях глобализации. Опыт политий Запада и Востока. – М. : Аспект Пресc, 2005. – 247 c.
  14. Ефременко Д. В. Ассиметрия мировой системы суверенитета: зоны проблемной государственности / Д. В. Ефременко ; [под ред. М. B. Ильина, И. В. Кудряшовой]. – М. : МГИМО Университет, 2011. – 247 c.
  15. Albi A. EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe / A. Albi. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 274 p.
  16. Моисеев А. О суверенитете государств в международном праве / А. Моисеев // Черные дыры в Российском законодательстве. – М., 2007. – № 2. – С. 349–353.
  17. Hoffman S. Thoughts on the French nation today / S. Hoffman // Daedalus. – Cambridge, 1993. – Vol. 122, № 3. – P. 63–80.
  18. Holsti K. IR theory and domestic war in the Third World: the limits of relevance / K. Holsti // International relations theory and the Third World / [ed. by S. Neuman]. – New York : St. Martin’s Press, 2004. – P. 103–132.
  19. Beyer P. Globalizing systems, global cultural models and religions / P. Beyer // Intern. sociology. – L, 2005. – Vol. 12, № 1. – P. 79–94.
  20. Марченко М. Н. Государство и право в условиях глобализации / Марченко М. Н. – М. : Проспект, 2008. – 400 с.




Copyright (c) 2014 Ірина Кресіна, Ірина Алєксєєнко

Creative Commons License
Ця робота ліцензована Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Розміщення журналу „Studia Politologica Ucraino-Polona” на платформі Open Journal Systems було можливим завдяки фінансовій підтримці Генерального Консульства Республіки Польща у Вінниці, в рамках здійснення проєкту «Розробка інтернет-версії політологічного журналу Studia Politologica Ucraino-Polona».