Assessment of prognostic factors for reconstruction of the upper third of the ureter with a tubularized pelvis flap

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.204070

Keywords:

ureteral reconstruction, ureteropelvic junction reconstruction, dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty

Abstract

Ureteral plastic with a tubularized pelvic flap is a rare option of ureteral reconstruction. We present the assessment of the factors that are important for predicting the success of this operation.

The aim. The purpose of the study was to assess the factors that are important in predicting the success of reconstruction of the upper third of the ureter with a tubularized pelvis flap.

Material and methods. The study included 73 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The first group had extended strictures of the upper third of the ureter (n=14 / 19.2 %), and the second group had pathology of the ureteropelvic junction associated with ureterovascular conflict (n=59 / 80.8 %).

Results. The length of the pelvic flap varied from 2.5 to 10.0 cm and reached an average of 3.9 cm. Early postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo gradation <3) were observed in 14 (9.2 %) patients out of 73, and dominated in the first group. The total number of positive long-term results (good + satisfactory) was 97.3 %. Two poor results were reported only in patients of the first group with prolonged recurrent strictures. A significant factor in the prognosis of complications was the secondary nature of the operation (p <0.004). The factors of the long-term results prognosis were the performance of dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty due to the extended strictures of the upper third of the ureter, and the duration of the operation more than 120 minutes (p <0.009 and p <0.026).

Conclusion. Surgical correction of the upper third of the ureter by a tubularized pelvis flap is a highly effective and safe method of reconstruction of the upper urinary tract. The main negative factors in the prognosis of this operation results are the secondary nature of the operation, the performance of the dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty because of the extended strictures of the upper third of the ureter, and the duration of the operation more than 120 minutes

Author Biographies

Vladyslav Demchenko, Kharkiv National Medical University Nauky ave., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Urology, Nephrology and Andrology

Dmytro Shchukin, Kharkiv National Medical University Nauky ave., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022

MD, professor

Department of Urology, Nephrology and Andrology

Gennadii Khareba, Kharkiv National Medical University Nauky ave., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Urology, Nephrology and Andrology

Igor Antonyan, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Amosova str., 58, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

MD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of General, Child’s and Oncological Urology

Andriy Maltsev, Kharkiv National Medical University Nauky ave., 4, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022

MD, Professor

Department of Urology, Nephrology and Andrology

References

  1. Adam, A., Smith, G. H. H. (2015). Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: are we all really on the same page? ANZ Journal of Surgery, 86 (3), 143–147. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13114
  2. Yerram, N., Babbar, P., Sun, A., Hemal, S., Murthy, P., Bryk, D. et. al. (2018). Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction – current status and future directions. Urology Annals, 10 (1), 7–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_94_17
  3. Nouralizadeh, A., Lashay, A., Radfar, M. H. (2014). Laparoscopic redo-pyeloplasty using vertical flap technique. Urology Journal, 11 (2), 1532–1533.
  4. Basiri, A., Mehrabi, S., Karami, H. (2010). Laparoscopic flap pyeloplasty in a child with ectopic pelvic kidney. Urology Journal, 7 (2), 125–127.
  5. Engel, O., Rink, M., Fisch, M. (2015). Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury and techniques for ureteral reconstruction. Current Opinion in Urology, 25 (4), 331–335. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000175
  6. Tyritzis, S. I., Wiklund, N. P. (2015). Ureteral Strictures Revisited…Trying to See the Light at the End of the Tunnel: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Endourology, 29 (2), 124–136. doi: http://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0522
  7. Kaouk, J. H., Kuang, W., Gill, I. S. (2002) Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique. Journal of Urology, 167 (1), 229–231.
  8. Salehipour, M., Khezri, A., Azizi, V., Kroup, M. (2006). Open Dismembered Tubularized Flap Pyeloplasty: An Effective and Simple Operation for Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Urologia Internationalis, 76 (4), 345–347. doi: http://doi.org/10.1159/000092060
  9. El-Asmar, K. M., El-Shafei, E. A., Abdel-Hay, S. (2014) Using the renal pelvis flap to replace the whole hypoplastic ureter: a preliminary report. Annals of Pediatric Surgery, 10, 68–71. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/01.xps.0000450334.54379.e5
  10. Kumar, S., Singh, S., Kumar, N. (2016). Robot-assisted “Santosh-Post Graduate Institute tubularized flap pyelovesicostomy” in a solitary functioning kidney with giant hydronephrosis: A minimally invasive salvage procedure. Investigative and Clinical Urology, 57 (2), 141. doi: http://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.141

Published

2020-05-31

How to Cite

Demchenko, V., Shchukin, D., Khareba, G., Antonyan, I., & Maltsev, A. (2020). Assessment of prognostic factors for reconstruction of the upper third of the ureter with a tubularized pelvis flap. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (3 (36), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.204070

Issue

Section

Medical Science