Comparative study of intrathecal tramadol and fentanyl as adjuvants in lower abdominal surgeries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2022.257524Keywords:
fentanyl, tramadol, postoperative analgesia, sensory block, motor block, bupivacaine, intrathecally, heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, visual analogue scale (VAS)Abstract
Spinal anesthesia is preferred choice of anesthesia in lower abdominal surgeries for a long time. However, the problem with this is limited duration of action, so for long duration surgeries alternatives are required.
The aim: to compare the intra-operative effects of a low dose of intrathecal tramadol and intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride.
Materials and methods: prospective randomized control study for a duration of study is one year. 50 patients, aged 18 years to 60 years, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were chosen.
These patients were divided into two groups: group BT- this group of patients received 2.5 mL volume of 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mg of tramadol intrathecally. Group BF- this group of patients received 2.5 mL volume of 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 μg of fentanyl intrathecally.
Results: demographic parameters in both the groups are not statistically significant. The association between the differences in duration of surgeries of both the study groups is not statistically. The association between the differences in mean time of onset of sensory block and motor block of both the study groups was comparable with p>0.05
The duration of sensory block (analgesia) and duration of motor block difference between the two means was statistically significant with p<0.0000001. The difference between the mean VAS score at 3 hours and at 20 hours was statistically significant with p<0.05. Among the study BT group, 52 % needed 2 analgesics and 48 % needed 3 doses of analgesics. Among BF group, 6 % needed only one dose of analgesics and 44 % needed 2 doses of analgesics. The difference between the two was statistically significant with p<0.000002. The association between the hemodynamic variables between both the groups at the end of procedure was statistically significant with p<0.05.
Conclusions: Intrathecal fentanyl and tramadol produced a similar onset of sensory and motor blocks. Fentanyl provided better duration and quality of postoperative analgesia compared to tramadol
References
- Elia, N., Culebras, X., Mazza, C., Schiffer, E., Tramèr, M. R. (2008). Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Local Anesthetics for Surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 33 (2), 159–167. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200803000-00011
- Boussofara, M., Carlès, M., Raucoules-Aimé, M., Sellam, M. R., Horn, J.-L. (2006). Effects of Intrathecal Midazolam on Postoperative Analgesia When Added to a Bupivacaine-Clonidine Mixture. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 31 (6), 501–505. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200611000-00005
- Shimode, N., Fukuoka, T., Tanimoto, M., Tashiro, C., Tokunaga, A., Noguchi, K. (2003). The effects of dexmedetomidine and halothane on Fos expression in the spinal dorsal horn using a rat postoperative pain model. Neuroscience Letters, 343 (1), 45–48. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00309-4
- Mystakidou, K., Katsouda, E., Parpa, E., Tsiatas, M. L., Vlahos, L. (2005). Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: An overview of its pharmacological and clinical characteristics. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 22 (3), 228–232. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/104990910502200313
- Hanks, G. W., Nugent, M., Higgs, C. M. B., Busch, M. A. (2004). Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the management of breakthrough pain in cancer: an open, multicentre, dose-titration and long-term use study. Palliative Medicine, 18 (8), 698–704. doi: http://doi.org/10.1191/0269216304pm966oa
- Dalvi, N. P., Patil, N. (2016). Comparison of Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl-bupivacaine and Tramadol-bupivacaine Combination on Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Journal of Research & Innovation in Anesthesia, 1 (2), 35–40. doi: http://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0010
- Patil, D. S. (2018). A Comparative study of epidural Fentanyl with Bupivacaine & epidural Tramadol with Bupivacaine for post operative pain relief after lower abdominal Surgery. Journal of Medical Science And Clinical Research, 6 (4). doi: http://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.205
- Desai, N., Kirkham, K. R., Albrecht, E. (2021). Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral regional anaesthesia: a narrative review. Anaesthesia, 76 (S1), 100–109. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15245
- Wang, C., Chakrabarti, M. K., Whitwam, J. G. (1993). Specific Enhancement by Fentanyl of the Effects of Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Nociceptive Afferent But Not on Sympathetic Efferent Pathways in Dogs. Anesthesiology, 79 (4), 766–773. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199310000-00019
- Subedi, A., Biswas, B. K., Tripathi, M., Bhattarai, B. K., Pokharel, K. (2013). Analgesic effects of intrathecal tramadol in patients undergoing caesarean section: a randomised, double-blind study. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 22 (4), 316–321. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.05.009
- Afolayan, J., Olajumoke, T., Amadasun, F., Edomwonyi, N. (2014). Intrathecal tramadol versus intrathecal fentanyl for visceral pain control during bupivacaine subarachnoid block for open appendicectomy. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 17 (3), 324–330. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.130234
- Singh, A. P. (2015). A comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine with bupivacainetramadol and bupivacaine-fentanyl for postoperative pain relief in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 6 (4), 752–758.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 H. L. Baby Rani, J. Samba Siva Rao, G. Vaishnavi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.