Integration on effective management of industrial enterprises on lean principles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.108795

Keywords:

lean production, lean production method, integration of methods, synergy effect, industrial enterprise

Abstract

The article deals with the methods of managing an industrial enterprise in their interaction, taking into account the focus of the result within the introduction of the concept of lean production.

Based on the analysis and generalization of scientific developments, the set of the most recognized and actively introduced methods of lean production is established by the frequency of mentions by foreign and domestic specialists: SOP, Kanban, JIT, 5 S, VSM, Visual Management, TPM, SMED, Kaizen, Poka-Yoke, Jidoka (another name is autonomation), Heijuka, Andon, 5 W, Team work. The relevance of their separate introduction through the achievement of the result of practical use aimed at reducing costs/losses in the value flow; increase in the effectiveness of the use of limited resources, identification of the causes of inefficient work; justification and adoption of managerial decisions with a focus on satisfying the customer's needs for finished products are disclosed.

For long-term success it is advisable to consider the use of integration of methods of the lean production concept, which provides a targeted integrated approach to justification and the adoption of well-balanced management decisions aimed at obtaining a synergistic effect on a continuous basis. The combination of methods in various combinations for efficient control of production capacities is justified (5 S + TPM + SMED, 5 S + TPM + SMED + Jidoka, 5 S + TPM + SMED + SOP + JIT + Poka-Yoke), material flow (5 S + SOP + JIT + VSM + Poka-Yoke, 5 S + JIT + Andon + Heijunka), document management and internal regulations (5 S + SOP + VSM + Poka-Yoke, 5 S + SOP + Kaizen). The types of synergies (social, market, financial, economic, innovative, personnel, organizational) are justified as a result of strengthening the effect of individual methods in a different combination.

It is advisable to apply the results of research practically to solve the problems of managing an industrial enterprise for technological development, organizational effectiveness, and social responsibility.

Author Biography

Iryna Kolos, National University of Food Technologies, 68, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01033

PhD, Associate Professor, Certified Accounting Practitioner

Department of Accounting and Auditing

References

  1. Wader, M. (2005). Lean Tools: A Pocket Guide to Implementing Lean Practices. Ed. 7. Translate from English. Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 125.
  2. Kolos, I. (2016). Duality of wastes of industrial enterprises within lean production. Scientific Works of National University of Food Technologies, 22 (5), 106–112.
  3. Levinson, W. A., Rerick, R. A. (2002). Lean Enterprise: A Synergistic Approach to Minimizing Waste. ASQ Quality Press, 236.
  4. Dudbridge, M. (2011). Handbook of Lean Manufacturing in the Food Industry. John Wiley & Sons, 240. doi:10.1002/9781444393125
  5. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press, 176.
  6. Shingo, S., Dillon, A. P. (1989). A Study of the Toyota Production System: From an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint. CRC Press, 296.
  7. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Education, 330.
  8. In: Marchwinski, C., Shook, J. (2006). Lean Lexicon: A Graphical Glossary for Lean Thinkers. Spi Ed. 5. Lean Enterprise Institute, 131.
  9. Dailey, K. W. (2003). The Lean Manufacturing Pocket Handbook. DW Publishing, 44.
  10. Hines, P., Found, P., Griffiths, G., Harrison, R. (2011). Staying Lean. Ed. 2. Productivity Press, 252. doi:10.1201/b10492
  11. Hobbs, D. P. (2003). Lean Manufacturing Implementation: A Complete Execution Manual for Any Size Manufacturer. J. Ross Publishing, Inc., 244.
  12. Pereira, R. (2013). Lean Manufacturing. Available: http://wkazarin.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LSSAGLM.pdf
  13. Tapping, D., Fertuck, D., Baban, V., Dunne, A. (2012). Lean Office Demystified II – Using the Power of the Toyota Production System in Your Administrative, Desktop and Networking Environments. Ed. 2. MCS Media, Inc., 402.
  14. Tapping, D., Shuker, T. (2003). Value Stream Management for the Lean Office. Productivity Press, 158. doi:10.1201/b16934
  15. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Revised and Updated. Productivity Press, 396.
  16. Safronova, K. O. (2011). Kak «Toyota Production System» (TPS) stala «Berezhlivym proizvodstvom». Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie preobrazovaniia i problemy, 1, 135–153.
  17. Safronova, K. O. (2012). Teoreticheskie osnovy kontseptsii berezhlivogo upravleniia operatsionnoi sistemoi biznesa. Sovremennyi menedzhment: voprosy teorii i praktiki, 5, 150–162.
  18. Feigenson, N. B., Matskevich, I. S., Lipetskaia, M. S. (2012). Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo i sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva: seriia dokladov (zelenyh knig) v ramkah proekta «Promyshlennyi i tehnologicheskii forsait Rossiiskoi Federatsii». Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Fond «Tsentr strategicheskih razrabotok «Severo-Zapad», 71. Available: http://www.csr-nw.ru/files/publications/zk1.pdf
  19. Omelianenko, T. V., Shcherbyna, O. V., Barabas, D. O., Vakulenko, A. V. (2009). Oshchadlyve vyrobnytstvo: kontseptsiia, instrumenty, dosvid. Kyiv: KNEU, 157.
  20. Kryshtopa, I. I. (2016). Stratehichnyi oblik obiednanoho biznesu: metodolohiia, modeliuvannia, orhanizatsiia. Kryvyi Rih: Vydavets FOP Cherniavskyi D.O., 464.

Published

2017-07-25

How to Cite

Kolos, I. (2017). Integration on effective management of industrial enterprises on lean principles. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(4(36), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.108795

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research