Optimization of expenditures on environmental actions in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.113218Keywords:
directions of the state’s environmental expenditures, natural resources, ecology, environmental expenditures, rational nature management, economics.Abstract
The necessity of Ukraine transition to developing ecologically safe national economics and limited financial input into the environment preservation have determined the need to optimize the expenditures on securing, reconstructing and recreating the natural environmental potential of the Ukrainian economics. Dynamic analysis of governmental expenditures on environment preservation has been performed via expert assessment method, during which experts have been defined and surveyed, matrix of ranks of the directions in environment preservation has been created, obtained results have been verified with coefficient of multiple ranks correlation and the criteria of results randomness. The performed analysis has allowed to define the most significant directions of the country environment preservation actions from the point of financial input priority.
The performed analysis of governmental expenditures on environment preservation is the beginning of long-term research, the main goal of which is the creation of complex methodic of rational environment resources usage. Consequently, the current paper describes the created methodological approach towards environment preservation, one of the most important result of the mentioned approach is the forecast of social, ecological and economical development of Ukraine.
All in all, the current paper contains intermediate, even preliminary results that are to be further investigated in the future works.
References
- Baldzhy, M. D. (2010). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni zasady kompleksnoho pryrodokorystuvannia na rehionalnomu rivni. Odesa: Atlant, 500.
- Honcharuk, L. Ya., Bashnianyn, H. I.; In: Bashnianyn, H. I. (2006). Sotsializatsiia ekonomichnykh system: problemy pryrody, typolohizatsii ta metrolohichnoho analizu. Ekonomichni systemy. Vol. 1. Lviv: Lviv Commercial Academy, 100–116.
- Koppel, J. (2017). Germany’s Energiewende. Innovation Society Today. Fachmedien, Wiesbaden: Springer, 273–293. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3_13
- Armstrong, F., http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=au%3ABlundell%2C+Katherine.&qt=hot_author">Blundell, K. (2007). Energy ... beyond oil.Oxford:OxfordUniv. Press, 229.
- Gubanova, E. R. (2009). Mehanizm ekonomiko-ekologicheskogo stimulirovaniia ispol'zovaniia vtorichnyh resursov. Odessa: «TES», 280.
- Yevtushenko, M. Yu., Hliebova, Yu. A. (2013). Biolohichni resursy hidrosfery. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi fitosotsiolohichnyi tsentr, 179.
- Harrington, W, Morgenstern, R., Sterner, T. (2010). Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe. Taylor & Francis, 296. doi:10.4324/9781936331468
- Hoepner, A. G. F., Kant, B., Scholtens, B., Yu, P.-S. (2012). Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecological Economics, 77, 193–206. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002
- Hoepner, A. G. F., Kant, B., Scholtens, B., Yu, P.-S. (2013). Is the journal Ecological Economics really in itself a poor and misleading guide to what ecological economics is about? A reply to «Influencing the perception of what and who is important in ecological economics». Ecological Economics, 89, 174–176. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.001
- Daw, T. M., Hicks, C., Brown, K., Chaigneau, T., Januchowski-Hartley, F., Cheung, W., Rosendo, S., Crona, B., Coulthard, S., Sandbrook, C., Perry, C., Bandeira, S., Muthiga, N. A., Schulte-Herbruggen, B., Bosire, J., McClanahan, T. R. (2016). Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being. Ecology and Society, 21 (2), 11. doi:10.5751/es-08173-210211
- Villamagna, A., Giesecke, C. (2014). Adapting Human Well-being Frameworks for Ecosystem Service Assessments across Diverse Landscapes. Ecology and Society, 19 (1), 11. doi:10.5751/es-06173-19011
- Zerkalov, D. V. (2012). Ekolohichna bezpeka ta okhorona dovkillia. Kyiv: Osnova, 514.
- Development strategy. (2017, March 30). Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Ukraine. Available at: https://menr.gov.ua/content/misiya-ta-strategiya.html
- Natsionalna dopovid pro stan navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha v Ukraini u 2014 rotsi. (2016). Kyiv: Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Ukraine, FOP Hrin D. S., 350. Available at: http://old.menr.gov.ua/docs/activity-dopovidi/NacDopovid2014.pdf
- Press service of the Ministry of Finance. (02.04.2014). Stan ekonomiky Ukrainy. Analiz. Government portal. Available at: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=247169548
- Maliarets, L. M. (2014). Ekonomiko-matematychni metody ta modeli. Kharkiv: KhNEU n. a. S. Kuznets, 412.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Maryna Mashchenko, Olena Klimenko, Olena Dykan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
