Development of the methodical approach to the formation of a competitiveness strategy Bilgorod-Dnestrovskiy sea trading port

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124681

Keywords:

competitive strategy, sea trading port, transport system, port specialization

Abstract

The object of research is the process of forming directions of increasing the competitiveness of ports, which is the result of the interaction of all elements of their production system and the external environment of providing port services. The article proposes to start the formation of a competitive strategy for the calculation of market shares of ports and the establishment of priority competitors on the basis of separation from the whole complex of those that are in close proximity to the port or have a significant impact on its activities.

In the process of development of a competitive strategy of the port, it is expedient to allocate the goods which have the greatest weight in the structure of cargo turnover of the port. Such goods for port of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi  in 2016–2017 years are timber (89.61–59.15 %) and grain (1.28–10.61 %).The share of port of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi for timber in the  structure of the Ukraine’s ports  is rather significant and overwhelming (67.76 %).

Thus, the main factor in the competition of the port is not only the quality of port services, but its accessibility to internal transport systems, the development of cross-border rates of practice. The paper proposes a systematic approach to substantiate the competitive strategy of a seaport using an economic-mathematical model of cargo distribution between ports in the process of forming cargoes delivery schemes from senders to consumers.

Mathematical model of the problem in the general form and the results of calculations of a control example for substantiation of the competitive strategy of the sea trading port of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi are presented in the article.

The effect in the transport system is achieved by saving expenses from transportation and handling of cargoes in the amount of 1010 thousand UAH. It can be concluded that the use of the system approach allows obtaining the synergy effect in achieving the optimal strategy of competitiveness of the port infrastructure of the region. It is proposed to determine the optimal cargo turnover of ports in condition of optimal organization of their work. The method of modeling the entire transport system for the delivery of cargoes through the sea ports of transshipment can be the basis of state management in Ukraine of regional seaports competitiveness

Author Biographies

Liudmyla Shyriaieva, Odessa National Marine University, 34, Mechnikova str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Finance

Olga Girina, Odessa National Marine University, 34, Mechnikova str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management of Logistics Systems and Projects

Maxim Bakriev, Odessa National Marine University, 34, Mechnikova str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Department of Economics and Finance

References

  1. Zhikhareva, V. V., Dubovik, N. V., Navrozova, Yu. O. (2016). Pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti diyalʹnosti ta konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryyemstv morehospodarsʹkoho kompleksu Ukrayiny. Odessa: KUPRIANO SV, 239.
  2. Porter, M. (2005). Konkurentsiya. Moscow, 608.
  3. Kotler, F. (1995). Osnovy marketynha. Moscow: Business-book, IMA-Cross.Plyus, 702.
  4. Azoyev, G. L. (2000). Konkurentnye preymushchestva fyrmy. Moscow: Typohrafyya Novosty, 256.
  5. Yudanov, A. Yu. (2001). Konkurentsiya: Teoriya i praktyka. Moscow: GNOMID, 304.
  6. Gerchikova, I. N. (2010). Menedzhment. Moscow, 512.
  7. Gradov, A. P. (2005). Natsyonalnaya ekonomyka. Saint Petersburg: Peter, 240.
  8. Demin, S. A. (2011). The concept of competitive products in the current conditions. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 3, 325–329.
  9. Merck, O. V. (2002). Metodychni zasady stratehiyi rozvytku morsʹkykh torhovelʹnykh portiv u konkurentnomu seredovyshchi. Kyiv, 16.
  10. Chekalovets, V. I., Kolodin, A. P., Stolyarov, G. P., Merkt, E. V., Grebennik, N. G., Olefir I. M. et al. (2002). Sovershenstvovanye upravlenyya morskymy torhovymy portamy. Odessa: ONMU, 142.
  11. Verbylo, O. M. (2012). Tendentsyi v lohystyke, vlyyayushchye na ronkurentosposobnostʹ portov. Lohystyka y upravlenye tsepyamy postavok, 4 (51). Available at: http://www.lscm.ru/index.php/ru/po-godam/item/1146
  12. Slack, B., Fremont, A. (2005). Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global. Transport Reviews, 25 (1), 117–130. doi:10.1080/0144164042000206051
  13. Van Der Horst, M. R., De Langen, P. W. (2008). Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 10 (1-2), 108–129. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100194
  14. Tongzon, J., Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39 (5), 405–424. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.001
  15. Davydenko, A. A. (2008). Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye konkurentosposobnosti regional'nykh morskikh portovykh kompleksov. Saint Petersburg, 37.
  16. Arenkov, I. A., Selikhova, Ya. Yu., Gavrilova, M. A. (2011). Konkurentnyi potentsial predpriyatiya: model' i strategiya razvitiya. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki, 4, 120–125. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konkurentnyy-potentsial-predpriyatiya-model-i-strategii-razvitiya
  17. Bodrovtseva, N. Yu. (2017). Analiz sredy funktsionirovaniya: proceedings // Problemy i perspektivy ekonomiki i upravleniya. Saint Petersburg: Svoye izdatel'stvo, 208–213. Available at: https://moluch.ru/conf/econ/archive/263/13421/. Last accessed: 31.12.2017
  18. Kurlyand, A. M., Postan, M. Ya., Savelʹeva, Y. V. (2013). Analyz sovremennykh tendentsyy razvytyya portov v systeme smeshannykh perevozok. Rozvytok metodiv upravlinnya ta hospodaryuvannya na transporti, 4 (45), 7–23.
  19. Girina, O. B. (2016). Mathematical modeling of system ports productive capacity. Scientific papers SWorld, 44 (3), 4–7. doi:10.21893/2410-6720-2016-44-1-111
  20. Shyriaieva, L. V. (2008). Metody y modely upravlenyya vosproyzvodstvom parkov oborudovanyya. Veroyatnostnyy pokhod. Odessa: Astroprynt, 256.
  21. Marchenko, M. M., Shyriaieva, L. V., Chyzh, L. P. et al.; Shyriaieva, L. V. (Ed.) (2017). Analiz finansovoyi zvitnosti pidpryyemstva (praktykum). Odessa: Interprint, 142.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Shyriaieva, L., Girina, O., & Bakriev, M. (2017). Development of the methodical approach to the formation of a competitiveness strategy Bilgorod-Dnestrovskiy sea trading port. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(5(39), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124681

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5(39) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Liudmyla Shyriaieva, Olga Girina, Maxim Bakriev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.