Development of methodical approach to the analysis of integration risks in the project of creation of the logistics center

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.134897

Keywords:

, project of creating a logistics center, integration risks, qualitative analysis of project risks

Abstract

The object of the research is the project of a logistics center, which is considered as an organizational and production integrated complex system, the main task of which is provision of the conditions for the integration of various objects of logistical and related infrastructure in one territory. This provides an opportunity to improve the movement of logistic flows.

One of the most problematic places is the lack of a project-oriented approach in the creation of a logistics center, which is characterized by a large number of participants, changing throughout its life cycle. This leads to the emergence of integration project risks, for the prevention of which it is necessary to develop an approach to qualitative risk analysis that takes into account the specific features of the research object.

In the course of the study, the concept of "integration project risk" is defined and a sequence of qualitative analysis of integration risks in the project of creating a logistics center is also developed, which consists of using quality management methods, namely: Pareto analysis, ABC analysis and Ishikawa cause-and-effect analysis. The application of methods of qualitative analysis is carried out in a logical sequence. The output data obtained from the previous analysis is the input for the next stage of the study.

The obtained results of a qualitative risk analysis allow at the initial stage of the project to increase the impact on its results by reducing the degree of integration risks. In particular, the Pareto analysis is proposed to be used to identify the main reasons for the emergence of integration risks for the project of creating a logistics center. ABC-analysis allows to identify project participants who have the greatest number of integration ties.  Therefore, the withdrawal of such a participant from the project will bring the greatest violations of integration between the elements of the system. The Ishikawa cause-and-effect analysis makes it possible to identify the causes of the disruption of integration ties between the project participants and to determine the least powerful integration ties between the participants.

Consequently, using of the proposed sequence of qualitative analysis will identify the project participants who are most vulnerable to the impact of integration risks and determine the power of integration ties between them. This, in turn, will allow taking measures to prevent the approaching of integration risks in the project of creating a logistics center.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Kovtun, Odessa National Maritime University, 34, Mechnikov str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Logistic Systems and Projects Management

Tetiana Smokova, Odessa National Maritime University, 34, Mechnikov str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Assistant

Department of Logistic Systems and Projects Management

References

  1. Syryichyk, T., Fuzrhalski, A. et al.; Svienchitski, M. (Ed.). (2010). Transportna polityka Ukrainy ta yii nablyzhennia do norm Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Kyiv: Analitychno-doradchyi tsentr Blakytnoi strichky, 102.
  2. Terminology on combined transport. (2001). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: https://www.unece.org/index.php?id=26168
  3. Sergeev, V. I. (2011). Logistika v transportnom komplekse Rossii: problemy i predlozheniya. Logistika v transportnom komplekse RF. Available at: http://www.myshared.ru/slide/955875/
  4. Krikavskiy, E. V. (2008). Logisticheskiy tsentr – eto uzlovoy obiekt logisticheskikh setey. Logistika: problemy i resheniya, 5 (18), 38–40.
  5. Gadzhinskiy, A. M. (2011). Logistika. Moscow: Dashkov i K, 481.
  6. Stock, J., Lambert, D. (2000). Strategic Logistics Management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 896.
  7. Waters, D. (2002). Logistics: An Introduction to Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmillan, 372.
  8. Nykyforuk, O. I. (2005). Stanovlennia i funktsionuvannia transportno-lohistychnoi infrastruktury v Ukraini. Kyiv, 21.
  9. Vinogradov, M. A. (2007). Upravlenie mezhregional'nym tovaroobmenom na osnove sozdaniya logisticheskikh tsentrov: na primere Rostovskoy oblasti. Rostov-na-Donu, 26.
  10. Poliakova, O. M. (2005). Formuvannia intermodalnoi transportnoi systemy Ukraini na bazi vantazhnykh transportno-rozpodilchykh kompleksiv. Kharkiv, 20.
  11. Tsvietkov, Yu. M., Kutakh, O. P., Makarenko, M. V. et. al. (2003). Kontseptsiia prohramy formuvannia merezhi lohistychnykh tsentriv v systemi mizhnarodnykh transportnykh korydoriv Ukrainy. Kyiv: KUETT, 109.
  12. Komarnytskyi, I. M., Pytuliak, N. S., Kohut, I. V. (2007). Mekhanizmy formuvannia lohistychnykh tsentriv. Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», 582, 190–196.
  13. Mamchyn, M. M., Rusanovska, O. A. (2011). Vplyv lohistychnykh ryzykiv na pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku», 720, 45–51.
  14. Rovenskikh, M. V. (2008). Upravlenie riskami logisticheskoy sistemy promyshlennogo predpriyatiya. Saint Petersburg, 261.
  15. Fuchs, H., Wohinz, J. W. (2009). Risk management in logistics systems. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 4, 233–242.
  16. Pletneva, N. G. (2008). Teoriya i metodologiya upravleniya logisticheskimi sistemami v usloviyakh neopredelennosti. Saint Petersburg, 37.
  17. Vitlinskyi, V. V., Skitsko, V. I. (2013). Kontseptualni zasady modeliuvannia ta upravlinnia lohistychnym ryzykom pidpryiemstva. Problemy ekonomiky, 4, 246–251.
  18. Larson, E. (2010). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw Hill, 608.
  19. Archibald, R. D. (2003). Managing High-Technology Programs and Projects. John Wiley & Sons, 416.
  20. Boldyreva, T. V., Kovtun, T. A. (2003). Metodika otsenki effektivnosti investitsionnogo proekta s uchetom situatsiy riska. Metodi ta zasobi upravlіnnya rozvitkom transportnikh system, 6, 237–255.
  21. Korolkova, E. M. (2013). Risk-menedzhment: upravlenie proektnymi riskami. Tambov: FGBOU VPO «TGTU», 160.
  22. Koshelevskiy, I. S. (2012). Obzor metodov upravleniya proektnymi riskami: Proceedings. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. Chelyabinsk: Dva komsomol'tsa, 164–166.
  23. Smokova, T. N. (2011). The integration in projects of multimodal logistics parks. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (7 (49)), 14–15. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2399
  24. Kovtun, T. A., Smokova, T. M. (2016). Upravlinnia intehratsiinymy ryzykamy v proektakh multymodalnykh lohistychnykh kompleksiv. Visnyk NTU «KhPI». Seriia: Stratehichne upravlinnia, upravlinnia portfeliamy, prohramamy ta proektamy, 2 (1174), 26–30.
  25. PMBOK. Rukovodstvo k Svodu znaniy po upravleniyu proektami (Rukovodstvo PMBOK). (2013). Project Management Institute, Fourteen Campus Boulevard, 589.
  26. Kovtun, T. A., Smokova, T. M. (2018). Zastosuvannia instrumentariiu yakisnoho analizu ryzykiv u proekti stvorennia lohistychnoho tsentru. Visnyk Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Dalia, 2 (243), 122–125.

Published

2018-01-23

How to Cite

Kovtun, T., & Smokova, T. (2018). Development of methodical approach to the analysis of integration risks in the project of creation of the logistics center. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(2(41), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.134897

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Original Research