Determination of investment accuracy and formation of information supply of geoecological monitoring of use of land

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.140901

Keywords:

investment attractiveness of lands, geoecological monitoring, information support, land use

Abstract

The object of research is the technology of determining the investment attractiveness and the formation of information support for geoecological monitoring of land use. One of the biggest problems in modern approaches to determining the investment attractiveness and geoecological state of land use is the complexity of existing approaches and the lack of information support.

Methods are developed to assess the investment attractiveness and geoecological status of land use. These methods make it possible to develop measures for a comprehensive increase in investment attractiveness and determine the geoecological state of the land for the development of methodological recommendations for improving the efficiency of land use. The proposed approaches are of an analytical nature and are based on the method of analyzing hierarchies, the results of correlation regression analysis. Unlike the existing ones, they allowed to form a system environment for the quantitative assessment of the geoecological state and land use.

During the research, spatial, multifactorial, rating and economic approaches were used. It is revealed that these approaches do not have a clear sequence and do not fully determine the current aspects of land use.

According to the developed methods, an integrated approach is proposed to assess the investment attractiveness and geoecological state of land use. It is based on the results of mathematical modeling and makes it possible to obtain an integrated assessment of the geoecological state of land use.

As a result, these developments will provide land assessment and decision-making by stakeholders at the local, regional and national levels. An integrated criterion has been developed that will allow to increase the level of land use and ensure their comprehensive assessment. The proposed recommendations will make it possible to clearly and reasonably influence the level of land use, and to resolve it in a timely manner. In comparison with the known approaches, the developed has a complex character and is based on successive stages of analytical calculations. This ensures the accuracy of the assessment and excludes the influence of objective factors in determining the investment attractiveness and geoecological status of land use.

Author Biographies

Yuliiа Radzinskaya, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 17, Marshala Bazhanova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Senior Lecturer

Department of Land Administration and Geographic Information Systems

Anna Korniiets, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 17, Marshala Bazhanova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Postgraduate Student

Department of Land Administration and Geographic Information Systems

References

  1. UNATED NATIONS: Inventory of Land Administration Systems in Europe and North Americ. London: Produced and published by HM Land Registry, behalf of the UNECE Working Party on Land Administration, 2005. Available at: http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=10952
  2. Informatsiia pro normatyvnu hroshovu otsinku zemel naselenykh punktiv stanom na 01 sichnia 2016 roku ta 01 sichnia 2017 roku. Derzhavna sluzhba Ukrainy z pytan heodezii, kartohrafii ta kadastru. Available at: http://land.gov.ua Last accessed: 08.02.2017
  3. Khvesyk, M. A. (2006). Instytutsionalne zabezpechennia zemlekorystuvannia: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv: Knyzhkove vyd-vo NAU, 260.
  4. Larsson, G. (1991). Land registration and Cadastral Systems: tools for land information and management. Esex: Longman Scientific and Technical, 387.
  5. Perovych, L. M., Hubar, Yu. P. (2016). Otsinka nerukhomosti. Lviv: Vyd-vo Nats. un-tu "Lvivska politekhnika", 300.
  6. Allahverdi, A., Ng, C. T., Cheng, T. C. E., Kovalyov, M. Y. (2008). A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 187 (3), 985–1032. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.060
  7. Bakici, S., Erkek, B., Ayyildiz, E., Ozmus, L. (2017). The use of 3d city models form oblique images on land administration. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-4/W4, 117–121. doi: http://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-4-w4-117-2017
  8. Sallivan, A. O. (2002). Chetvertoe izdanie «Ekonomika goroda». Moscow: INFRA, 705.
  9. Mamonov, K. A., Nesterenko, S. H., Viatkin, K. I. (2016). HIS-zabezpechennia u ratsionalnomu vykorystanni zemelnykh resursiv miskoi zabudovy. Naukovyi visnyk budivnytstva, 86 (4), 323.
  10. Palekha, Yu. N. (2003). Osobennosti ispol'zovaniya GIS-tekhnologiy v otsenke territoriy naselennykh punktov Ukrainy. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional'nogo universiteta im. V. V. Vernadskogo. Geografiya, 16 (55), 125–132.
  11. Adamenko, O. M., Lobodina, Z. M., Lutsenko, A. S., Trysniuk, V. M. (2003). Heoinformatsiini systemy ekolohichnoi bezpeky obiektiv naftohazovoho kompleksu. Kyiv: Znannia, 28–30.
  12. Bilashenko, O. H. (2015). Vyznachennia heoekolohichnoho stanu tekhnohenno-navantazhenykh terytorii za kompleksom heofizychnykh danykh. Dnipropetrovsk, 176.
  13. Pieri, C., Dumanski, J., Hamblin, A., Young, A. (1995). Land Quality Indicators. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 315. Washington: World Bank, 51.
  14. Danylyshyn, B. M., Dorohuntsov, S. I., Mishchenko, V. S., Koval, Ya. V., Novotorov, O. S., Palamarchuk, M. M. (1999). Pryrodno-resursnyi potentsial staloho rozvytku Ukrainy. Kyiv: RVPS Ukrainy, 716.
  15. Trysniuk, V. M. (2004). Heoekolohichnyi monitorynh Podilskykh Tov-tr v mezhakh Husiatynskoho raionu Ternopilskoi oblasti. Chernivtsi.
  16. Shaver, T. M., Peterson, G. A., Ahuja, L. R., Westfall, D. G., Sherrod, L. A., Dunn, G. (2002). Surface Soil Physical Properties After Twelve Years of Dryland No-Till Management. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66 (4), 1296–1303. doi: http://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1296
  17. Novakovskyi, L. Ya., Tretiak, A. M., Dobriak, D. S. (2001). Zemelna reforma i zemleustrii v Ukraini. Kyiv: IZU UAAN, 138.
  18. Sakala, W. D., Kumwenda, J. D. T., Saka, A. R. (2003). The Potential of Green Manures to Increase Soil Fertility and Maize Yields in Malawi. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 21 (2), 121–130. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2003.9755257
  19. Radzinska, Yu. B. (2017). Teoretychni pidkhody shchodo otsinky investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti zemel mist. Suchasni tekhnolohii ta metody rozrakhunkiv u budivnytstvi, 8, 216–221.
  20. Scopel, E., Findeling, A., Guerra, E. C., Corbeels, M. (2005). Impact of direct sowing mulch-based cropping systems on soil carbon, soil erosion and maize yield. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 25 (4), 425–432. doi: http://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2005041

Published

2018-04-24

How to Cite

Radzinskaya, Y., & Korniiets, A. (2018). Determination of investment accuracy and formation of information supply of geoecological monitoring of use of land. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(42), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.140901

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Original Research