The development of a three-dimensional model of the ice growth process on aerodynamic surfaces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.145296

Keywords:

icing of aerodynamic surfaces, icing protection systems, mathematical modeling of the ice growth process

Abstract

The object of research is the processes of hydroaerodynamics and heat and mass transfer that occur when icing the aerodynamic surfaces of aircraft during flight in adverse weather conditions. One of the problem areas in the development of software and methodological support that allows to simulate the icing processes, there are difficulties in the transition to solving the problem in three-dimensional formulation. As well as the presence of contradictions in existing methods in describing the physical picture and, accordingly, the thermodynamics of the process of ice growth.

During the study, experimental and analytical methods were used to study the physical processes of ice growth on streamlined surfaces, based on a phased analysis of the interaction of supercooled droplets with the surface and their subsequent freezing at the wing edge. The proposed model of the process of ice growth is based on the use of the method of surface control volumes, based on the equations of continuity, conservation of momentum and energy. Based on the new experimental data obtained on the physics of icing, it is proposed to separate the processes of the formation of a bulk ice-water structure and subsequent complete freezing of this structure separately in the methodology for modeling ice growth. At the first stage of the fluid crystallization process, as part of the step on the icing time, the supercooled fluid contained in the droplets that fall on the streamlined surface passes into a state of thermodynamic equilibrium. That is, the latent heat of solidification released during the formation of an ice fraction in the ice-water structure will be equal to the internal heat required to heat the supercooled fluid from the temperature of the droplets to the temperature of the phase transition. At the second stage, the water contained in the ice-water structure will freeze due to heat loss by convection, evaporation, sublimation, thermal conductivity (minus the latent heat of solidification, kinetic and aerodynamic heating). It should be noted that the water that will freeze will also fetter the spatial ice structure. In this case, the method of successive approximations is applied to determine the direction of fluid movement along the streamlined surface.

Compared with the well-known traditional methods, this approach makes it possible to take into account to a greater extent the real physical processes of icing of aerodynamic surfaces that are extremely complex for mathematical description.

The results can be used to optimize the operation of anti-icing systems and determine ways to reduce energy costs during the operation of such systems.

Author Biographies

Sergey Alekseyenko, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, 72, Gagarina ave., Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Mechatronics

Оleg Yushkevich, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, 72, Gagarina ave., Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Mechatronics

References

  1. Wright, W. B. (1995). Users Manual for the Improved NASA Lewis Ice Accretion Code LEWICE 1.6. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA). Contractor Report, 95.
  2. Gent, R. W. (1990). TRAJICE2 – A Combined Water Droplet and Ice Accretion Prediction Program for Aerofoil. Royal Aerospace Establishment (RAE). Technical Report Number TR90054. Farnborough, 83.
  3. Guffond, D., Hedde, T., Henry, R. (1993). Overview of Icing Research at ONERA, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. Fluid Dynamics Panel (AGARD/FDP) Joint International Conference on Aircraft Flight Safety Actual Problems of Aircraft Development. Zhukovsky, 7.
  4. Tran, P., Brahimi, M. T., Paraschivoiu, I., Pueyo, A., Tezok, F. (1994). Ice Accretion on Aircraft Wings with Thermodynamic Effects. 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA Paper No. 0605. Reno, 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-605
  5. Mingione, G., Brandi, V. (1998). Ice Accretion Prediction on Multielement Airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 35 (2), 240–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/2.2290
  6. Dillingh, J. E., Hoeijmakers, H. W. M. (2003). Accumulation of Ice Accretion on Airfoils during Flight. Federal Aviation Administration In-flight Icing and Aircraft Ground De-icing. Chicago, 13.
  7. Beaugendre, H., Morency, F., Habashi, W. G. (2002). ICE3D, FENSAP-ICE’S 3D In-Flight Ice Accretion Module. 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA 2002-0385. Reno. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-385
  8. Pueyo, A., Chocron, D., Kafyeke, F. (2001). Improvements to the Ice Accretion Code CANICE. Proceedings of the 8th Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute (CASI). Aerodynamic Symposium. Toronto, 9.
  9. Al-Khalil, K. M., Keith, T. G., De Witt, Jr., K. J., Nathman, J. K., Dietrich, D. A. (1989). Thermal Analysis of Engine Inlet Anti-Icing Systems. 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA 89-0759. Reno, 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-759
  10. Al-Khalil, K. M., Keith, T. G., De Witt, K. J. (1991). Further Development of an Anti-Icing Runback Model. 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA-91-0266. Reno, 12. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-266
  11. Alekseyenko, S., Sinapius, M., Schulz, M., Prykhodko, O. (2015). Interaction of Supercooled Large Droplets with Aerodynamic Profile. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2118, 12. doi: http://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-2118
  12. Alekseenko, S. V., Mendig, C., Schulz, M., Sinapius, M., Prykhodko, O. A. (2016). An experimental study of freezing of supercooled water droplet on solid surface. Technical Physics Letters, 42 (5), 524–527. doi: http://doi.org/10.1134/s1063785016050187
  13. Fortin, G., Laforte, J., Beisswenger, A. (2003). Prediction of Ice Shapes on NACA0012 2D Airfoil. SAE Technical Paper Series, 01–2154, 7.
  14. Wright, W. (2008). Users Manual for LEWIC-E Version 3.2 2008. NASA Contractor Report. Cleveland. URL: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080048307.pdf
  15. Shin, J., Bond, T. (1992). Experimental and Computational Ice Shapes and Resulting Drag Increase for a NACA 0012 Airfoil. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA). Technical Memorandum No. 105743, 10.
  16. Alekseyenko, S., Yushkevich, О. (2018). Application of numerical simulation methods for reduction of aircrafts ice protection systems energy consumption. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5 (1 (43)), 4–10. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.145298
  17. Alekseyenko, S. V., Prykhodko, O. A. (2013). Numerical simulation of icing of a cylinder and an airfoil: model review and computational results. TsAGI Science Journal, 44 (6), 761–805. doi: http://doi.org/10.1615/tsagiscij.2014011016
  18. Zhu, C., Fu, B., Sun, Z., Zhu, C. (2012). 3D ice accretion simulation for complex configuration basing on improved messinger model. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, 19, 341–350. doi: http://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194512008938
  19. Guffond, D., Hedde, T. (1994). Prediction of Ice Accretion: Comparison Between the 2D and 3D Codes. La Recherche Aerospatiale, 2, 103–115.

Published

2019-07-12

How to Cite

Alekseyenko, S., & Yushkevich О. (2019). The development of a three-dimensional model of the ice growth process on aerodynamic surfaces. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(1(48), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.145296

Issue

Section

Mechanics: Original Research