Improvement of the enterprise infrastructure evaluation method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.159210

Keywords:

enterprise infrastructure, complex evaluation, qualitative evaluation, enterprise infrastructure management expenses, introduction of a new IT service

Abstract

The object of research is the enterprise infrastructure. The main task of enterprise infrastructure is ensuring the availability of IT services and software for users and support business growth. The main disadvantage of the existing process of evaluating the infrastructure of an enterprise is identification of its main components. One of the most problematic places is the evaluation of the enterprise infrastructure to determine the impact of the introduction of a new IT service in a context of continuous changes in functional requirements of end-users.

Based on the results of the analysis of the infrastructure evaluation problems and the existing variants of the term "enterprise infrastructure", the main elements of the enterprise infrastructure are identified. It is proposed to define the infrastructure of the enterprise as a set of interconnected IT services, information and communication technologies integrated by the computer network of the enterprise.

In the course of the research, the analysis of the basic methods of evaluating the infrastructure of the enterprise was carried out, their advantages and disadvantages were determined. As a result of the analysis of the enterprise infrastructure evaluation process, an improved method for evaluating the infrastructure of the enterprise was proposed.

The proposed method, in contrast to the existing ones, combines quantitative cost evaluation and a qualitative evaluation of the components of the updated infrastructure of the enterprise, allowing a comprehensive evaluation of its infrastructure and formulating recommendations for the application of the selected IT service.

The advantage of the proposed method is that it provides the opportunity to form a preliminary evaluation of the planned changes in the infrastructure of the enterprise and thus refuse to make changes in the event of their low efficiency. It is noted that any modification of the infrastructure of an enterprise leads to a change in the indicator of its quality evaluation. Consequently, the detection of the dynamics of the indicator of quality evaluation will allow controlling the quality of the infrastructure of the enterprise. The accumulated statistics makes it possible to identify trends and, on the basis of their analysis, make timely decisions about the need for changes in the infrastructure of the enterprise in order to adapt it to the new conditions.

The results of the enterprise infrastructure evaluation can also be used to develop management decisions for the development and improvement of the enterprise.

Author Biographies

Viktor Levykin, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, 14, Nauky ave. Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Information Control System

Ivan Iuriev, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, 14, Nauky ave. Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Assistant

Department of Information Control System

References

  1. Lavinghouze, S. R., Snyder, K., Rieker, P. P. (2014). The component model of infrastructure: a practical approach to understanding public health program infrastructure. American journal of public health, 104 (8), 14–24. doi: http://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302033
  2. Pushkar', A. I., Garkin, V. V. (2013). Ispol'zovanie modeli zrelosti ІT-infrastruktury v otsenke kachestva informatsionnykh sistem predpriyatiya. Vіsnik Sums'kogo derzhavnogo unіversitetu. Serіya: Ekonomіka, 3, 130–145.
  3. Kralik, L., Senkerik, R., Jasek, R. (2015). Proposal of evaluation criteria for free and open source tools for modelling and support of it service management according to ITIL. 29th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS 2015, 537–542. doi: http://doi.org/10.7148/2015-0537
  4. Colledani, M., Tolio, T., Fischer, A., Iung, B., Lanza, G., Schmitt, R., Váncza, J. (2014). Design and management of manufacturing systems for production quality. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 63 (2), 773–796. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.002
  5. Maevskiy, D. A., Maevskaya, E. Yu. (2008). Osnovnye printsipy postroeniya uchetnykh sistem operatsionnogo upravleniya. Elektromashinobuduvannya ta elektroobladnannya, 70, 123–126.
  6. Vishnyakov, Yu. M., Novikov, S. Yu. (2008) Formalizatsiya zadachi upravleniya urovnem servisov v informatsionnykh sistemakh. Izvestiya YUFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 4, 133–136.
  7. Scheibenberger, K., Pansa, I. (2008). Modelling dependencies of IT Infrastructure elements. 3rd IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Business-driven IT Management. Salvador, 112–113. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/bdim.2008.4540083
  8. da Silv, L. F., Brito e Abreu, F. (2010). An IT Infrastructure Patterns Approach to Improve IT Service Management Quality. Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 171–176. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/quatic.2010.34
  9. Traub, M., Maier, A., Barbehön, K. L. (2017). Future Automotive Architecture and the Impact of IT Trends. IEEE Software, 34 (3), 27–32. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2017.69
  10. Serrano, N., Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J. (2015). Infrastructure as a Service and Cloud Technologies. IEEE Software, 32 (2), 30–36. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2015.43
  11. Armendariz, M., Johansson, C., Nordström, L., Yunta Huete, A., García Lobo, M. (2017). Method to design optimal communication architectures in advanced metering infrastructures. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 11 (2), 339–346. doi: http://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0481
  12. Marrone, M., Kolbe, L. M. (2011). Impact of IT Service Management Frameworks on the IT Organization. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3 (1), 5–18. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0141-5
  13. Dong, W., Ji, Q. D., He, L. N. (2014). An Enterprise-Wide Digital Archive Management System Infrastructure. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 513-517, 2420–2423. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.513-517.2420
  14. Liu, S.-C., Wu, T.-H. (2010). Enterprise Information Infrastructure Constructed by Integral Planning. International Journal for Digital Society, 1 (3), 172–178. doi: http://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2010.0022
  15. DSTU ISO 9004:2012 (ISO 9004:2009, IDT) (2013). Upravlinnia zadlia dosiahnennia staloho uspikhu orhanizatsii. Pidkhid na osnovi upravlinnia yakistiu. Na zaminu DSTU ISO 9004:2001; chynnyi z 2013-05-01. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 60.
  16. Martini, B., Paganelli, F. (2016). A service-oriented approach for dynamic chaining of virtual network functions over multi-provider software-defined networks. Future Internet, 8 (2), 24. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/fi8020024
  17. Levykin, V. M., Yur'ev, I. A. (2016). Razrabotka modeley otsenki kachestva infrastruktury predpriyatiya i infrastruktury informatsionnoy sistemy. Radioelektronnye i komp'yuternye sistemy, 3 (77), 100–105.
  18. Melendez, K., Dávila, A., Pessoa, M. (2016). Information technology service management models applied to medium and small organizations: A systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 47, 120–127. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2015.10.001
  19. Levykin, V., Iuriev, I. (2017). Stages and results of typical project on development of IT organization strategy. Wschodnie partnerstwo 2017, 3, 10–13.

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Levykin, V., & Iuriev, I. (2018). Improvement of the enterprise infrastructure evaluation method. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(2(45), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.159210

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research