Development of a model of integrated risk and conflict management of scientific project stakeholders under conditions of behavioral economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.207086

Keywords:

scientific project, stakeholder, conflict and risk management, factor of behavioral economy, integrated management.

Abstract

The object of research is the processes of conflict and risk management of stakeholders of a scientific project, in particular the project team, the main executors of the project (scientists) and other stakeholders, in a behavioral economy. At the present stage of the country’s development, scientists work in very difficult conditions, in particular: limited resources (material, human, financial, time and others). The complexity of internal and external processes of a scientific project and the relationship between its stakeholders leads to risks and conflicts that may be caused by behavioral factors. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically approach the analysis of scientific project stakeholders, develop a unified approach to integrated risk and conflict management of scientific project stakeholders in a behavioral economy.

The paper proposes a model of integrated risk and conflict management of a scientific project in a behavioral economy, which is based on the following stages:

– identification of stakeholders and related risks, conflicts and behavioral economics that may arise in the planning and implementation of a scientific project and have an impact on it;

– building a model of integrated risk and conflict management of stakeholders of a scientific project in a behavioral economy;

– the modeling of integrated risk and conflict management of stakeholders of the scientific project in the conditions of behavioral economy is carried out on the basis of the identified risks, conflicts and factors of behavioral economy.

The developed model of integrated risk and conflict management of stakeholders in a behavioral economy will analyze the main factors influencing stakeholders, including risks, conflicts and behavioral economics, on the scientific project. The use of the principles of integrated management of various factors allows to determine the sources and causes of complications that may arise in the scientific project, and the simulation results will be useful to the project manager and its team in the planning and implementation of the project.

Author Biography

Dmytro Bedrii, State Enterprise «Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute of Radio and Television», 31, Buninа str., Odesa, Ukraine, 65026

PhD, Deputy Director for Scientific Work

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2017). PMBOK® Guide, PMI, 574.
  2. International Project Management Association (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management, 415.
  3. Bedrii, D. I. (2017). Osoblyvosti proektno-oriientovanoho upravlinnia naukovymy proektamy. Project, Program, Portfolio Management. Odesa: ONPU, 2, 15–18.
  4. Bedrii, D. I. (2019). Ohliad faktoriv povedinkovoi ekonomiky v upravlinni naukovymy proektamy. Project, Program, Portfolio Management. Odesa: ONPU, 1, 14–18.
  5. Danchenko, O. B., Bedrii, D. I., Semko, I. B. (2017). Identyfikatsiia kadrovykh ryzykiv naukovykh proektiv. Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva, 4 (64), 18–24.
  6. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, 300. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815768
  7. Demarko, T., Lister, T. (2005). Chelovecheskii faktor: uspeshnye proekty i komandy. Saint Petersburg: Simvol-Plius, 200.
  8. Strack, R., Caye, J.-M., Carsten von der Linden, Haen, P., Abramo, F. (2013). Creating People Advantage. Lifting HR Practices to the Next Level. Available at: https://image-src.bcg.com/Images/Creating_People_Advantage_Oct_2013_tcm9-91995.pdf
  9. Dayton, D. (2011). Communicating quality: the social construction of management and leadership. Mason: ALEF Consulting.
  10. Smith, P. G., Merritt, G. M. (2002). Proactive risk management. New York: Productivity Press, 246.
  11. Thamhain, H. (2013). Managing Risks in Complex Projects. Project Management Journal, 44 (2), 20–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21325
  12. Danchenko, O. B., Bedrіi, D. І., Semko, І. B. (2019). Conflict management of scientific project. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 2 (1327), 28–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2019.1327.5
  13. Bushuyev, S., Bushuiev, D. (2017). Emotional Intelligence – The Driver of Development of Breakthrough Competences of the Project. Proceedings 30th IPMA World Congress – Breakthrough competences for managing change. Astana, 8–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/stc-csit.2017.8099418
  14. Bushuiev, S. D., Bushuiev, D. A., Yaroshenko, R. F. (2018). Upravlinnia proektamy v umovakh «povedinkovoi ekonomiky». Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 33, 22–30. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-33/5.pdf
  15. Iakovleva, E. A. (2016). Analiz vozmozhnostei ispolzovaniia principov povedencheskoi ekonomiki dlia priniatiia effektivnykh upravlencheskikh reshenii. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniia, 5 (65). Available at: https://sovman.ru/article/6504/
  16. Taleb, N. N. (2015). Chernii lebed. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti. Moscow: «KoLibri», 736.
  17. Sepeda Huaman, D. F., Danchenko, O. B. (2019). Vdoskonalenyi metod PESTLE-analizu zovnishnoho seredovyshcha proektiv. Upravlinnia proektamy u rozvytku suspilstva. Upravlinnia proektamy v umovakh ochikuvannia hlobalnykh zmin. Kyiv: KNUBA, 96–98.
  18. Bedrii, D. I. (2018). Identyfikatsiia konfliktiv u naukovykh proektakh. Project, Program, Portfolio Management. Odesa: ONPU, 2, 17–20.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Bedrii, D. (2020). Development of a model of integrated risk and conflict management of scientific project stakeholders under conditions of behavioral economy. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(2(53), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.207086

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research