Establishment of a network for the public atmospheric air monitoring and informing the population

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.210376

Keywords:

atmospheric air, PM2.5 and PM10 pollution, measurement sensors, city grid, public information, observation network.

Abstract

Perelik prohramnykh produktiv v haluzi okhorony atmosfernoho povitria. Available at: https://menr.gov.ua/content/perelik-programnih-produktiv-v-galuzi-ohoroni-atmosfernogo-povitrya.html

The object of research is monitoring the state of atmospheric air pollution in agglomerations with subsequent informing the population. Monitoring the state of the city's atmospheric air is of great importance both at the state level and for the public. In this work, public monitoring of atmospheric air is created on the example of the city of Poltava (Ukraine). The creation of a network for public monitoring of the state of air pollution in the city provides for independent monitoring of air pollution, based on decrees and other guidelines on air quality. In accordance with the existing requirements, the state monitoring of atmospheric air has a number of disadvantages, namely:

– lack of monitoring of suspended solids, including PM2.5 and PM10;

– monitoring of atmospheric air pollution at stationary observation posts is carried out a maximum of 4 times a day;

– lack of a system of informing the population about the state of the air in the city, in particular, PM2.5 and PM10 pollution

– lack of automated systems for analyzing air quality, that is, monitoring is carried out by sampling. In contrast to the conduct of state observation, public monitoring will provide not only informing the population, involving them in monitoring, but will also increase environmental awareness, responsibility, and create an additional tool for controlling air pollution. For the effective functioning of the public monitoring network, rules have been developed for conducting public monitoring of the state of atmospheric air pollution in the city with a description of the location of pollution sensors, their operation and basic requirements. Also, a website has been developed based on the monitoring database, reflecting the results of public monitoring. Taking into account that if the database contains data on the indicators of installed sensors (point measurements), then the site for informing the population is a visualization of the control results throughout the city, that is, it will act as a model for the distribution of pollution in the city's atmospheric air.

Author Biographies

Yuriy Holik, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», 24, Pershotravnevyi ave., Poltava, Ukraine, 36011

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Heat and Gas Supply, Ventilation and Energy

Nataliia Maksiuta, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», 24, Pershotravnevyi ave., Poltava, Ukraine, 36011

Postgraduate Student

Department of Applied Ecology and Nature Management

References

  1. Wan, K., Shackley, S., Doherty, R. M., Shi, Z., Zhang, P., Golding, N. (2020). Science-policy interplay on air pollution governance in China. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 150–157. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.003
  2. Golik, Y., Illiash, O., Chuhlib, Y., Maksiuta, N. (2020). Environmental Areas of Poltava Planning Development. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Building Innovations, 375–383. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42939-3_38
  3. Payne-Sturges, D. C., Schwab, M., Buckley, T. J. (2004). Closing the research loop: a risk-based approach for communicating results of air pollution exposure studies. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112 (1), 28–34. doi: http://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6354
  4. Maksiuta, N., Golik, Y. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Pollution of Atmospheric Air in Cities (an Example of Leipzig and Poltava). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 260–267. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_33
  5. Morello-Frosch, R., Brody, J. G., Brown, P., Altman, R. G., Rudel, R. A., Pérez, C. (2009). Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants. Environmental Health, 8 (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069x-8-6
  6. Pebesma, E. J. (2001). Gstat user's manual. Utrecht, 103.
  7. Mendes, J. F. G., Silva, L. T., Ribeiro, P., Magalhães, A. (2009). An urban environmental monitoring and information system. Air Pollution XVII. doi: http://doi.org/10.2495/air090101
  8. Hurley, P. J. (1999). The air pollution model (TAPM) version 1: Technical description and examples. Aspendale, 57.
  9. Sofiev, M., Vira, J., Prank, M., Soares, J., Kouznetsov, R. (2013). An outlook of System for Integrated modeLling of Atmospheric coMposition SILAM v.5. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 397–400. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5577-2_67
  10. Perelik prohramnykh produktiv v haluzi okhorony atmosfernoho povitria. Available at: https://menr.gov.ua/content/perelik-programnih-produktiv-v-galuzi-ohoroni-atmosfernogo-povitrya.html

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Holik, Y., & Maksiuta, N. (2020). Establishment of a network for the public atmospheric air monitoring and informing the population. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(3(54), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.210376

Issue

Section

Reports on research projects