Development of an automated system for making multi-stage management decisions at industrial enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.210535

Keywords:

multi-stage solution, automated system, risk management, activity diagram, functional model.

Abstract

The object of research is the process of making managerial decisions, which requires an analysis of the sequence of decisions and external factors, in the case when one set of strategies of the subject of control and states of the external environment generates another state of this type.

The study is devoted to the issues of automation of management processes of socio-economic systems, namely, the creation of a model and software implementation of the process of making multi-stage decisions at a manufacturing enterprise. The production system is a complex dynamic system, therefore it is characterized by uncertainty in its functioning, as well as a large number of heterogeneous elements and connections, multivariate development. These characteristics of the system, as well as the fundamental uncertainty of external factors of functioning, necessitate the analysis of a large amount of information, which is inherent in uncertainty and incompleteness. Therefore, it is important to create automated management decision-making support systems.

The objective of research is to create a rational choice model in a situation where there are two (or more) sequential sets of decisions, and subsequent decisions are based on the results of the previous ones. This situation assumes the presence of two (or more) multiple states of the external environment. That is, a whole chain of decisions appears, arising from each other and corresponding to events that occur with a certain probability. To solve this type of problem, the game-theoretic apparatus of multi-stage games with nature is used.

In order to carry out experiments with the model, its software implementation has been developed. The paper reviews the existing analogues, analyzes the input and output data of the model. Within the framework of the object-oriented programming methodology, an activity diagram is built, the functionality of the actors is determined, and a description of the functional model is made.

By conducting experiments with the model, it is possible to improve the validity of management decisions. The advantages of the developed automated system in comparison with known analogues: support for multi-stage management decisions, providing opportunities for saving and correcting results.

Author Biographies

Ganna Solodovnik, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 40, Sumska str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Science and Information Technology

Alena Deynega, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 40, Sumska str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Department of Computer Science and Information Technology

References

  1. Brumnik, R., Klebanova, T., Guryanova, L., Kavun, S., Trydid, O. (2014). Simulation of Territorial Development Based on Fiscal Policy Tools. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/843976
  2. Daradkeh, Y., Guryanova, L., Kavun, S., Klebanova, T. (2012). Forecasting the cyclical dynamics of the development territories: Conceptual approaches, models, experiments. European Journal of Scientific Research, 74 (1), 5–20
  3. Vitlinskyi, V. V., Velykoivanenko, H. I. (2004). Ryzykolohiia v ekonomitsi ta pidpryiemnytstvi. Kyiv: KNEU, 120.
  4. Solodovnyk, H. V. (2016). Instrumentalni zasoby modeliuvannia sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system. Kharkiv: Rozhko S. H., 122.
  5. Akdere, M. (2011). An analysis of decision-making process in organizations: Implications for quality management and systematic practice. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22 (12), 1317–1330. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.625180
  6. Lee, M., Stinson, D. (2014). Organizational decision making models: comparing and contrasting to the stinson wellness model. European Journal of Management, 14 (3), 13–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.18374/ejm-14-3.2
  7. Tohidi, H., Jabbari, M. M. (2012). Decision role in management to increase effectiveness of an organization. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 825–828. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.149
  8. Negulescu, O., Doval, E. (2014). The Quality of Decision Making Process Related to Organizations’ Effectiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 858–863. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00548-6
  9. Harris, J. G., Davenport, T. H. (2005). Automated decision making comes of age. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46 (4).
  10. Abishov, N., Asan, D., Kanat, A., Erkisheva, Z. (2014). Development of an Automated Information System University Management. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 550–554. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.434
  11. Sheshasaayee, A., Bhargavi, K. (2017). A study of automated decision making systems. Research Inventy: International Journal of Engineering And Science, 7, 28–31
  12. Mousavi, S. M., Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Ebrahimnejad, S., Amiri, M. (2012). A multi-stage decision-making process for multiple attributes analysis under an interval-valued fuzzy environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64 (9-12), 1263–1273. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4084-5
  13. Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). The Multi-stage Decision Making System for Complicated Problems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 215–219. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.248
  14. Labsker, L. G., Ianovskaia, E. V. (2002). Obschaia metodika konstruirovaniia kriteriev optimalnosti reshenii v usloviiakh riska i neopredelennosti. Finansovii menedzhment, 5, 58–74.
  15. Voronotsova, G. V. (2010). Osnovne napravleniia adaptatsii sistemy upravleniia predpriiatiem v konkurentnoi srede.
  16. Zaitsev, M. G., Variukhin, S. E. (2008). Metody optimizatsii upravleniia i priniatiia reshenii: primery, zadachi, keisy. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Delo» ANKH, 664.
  17. Booch, G., Maksimchuk, R. A., Engle, M. W., Young, B. J., Conallen, J., Houston, K. A. (2007). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. Addison-Wesley Professional, 720.
  18. Rosenberg, D., Scott, K. (1999). Use Case Driven Object Modeling with UML: A Practical Approach. Addison-Wesley Professional, 188.
  19. Solodovnyk, H. V. (2018). Modeliuvannia bahatokrokovykh upravlinskykh rishen. Yevropeiskyi vektor modernizatsii ekonomiky: kreatyvnist, prozorist ta stalyi rozvytok. Chastyna 1. Kharkiv, 191–194.
  20. Fowler, M., Scott, K. (1999). UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison Wesley Object Technology Series, 192.
  21. Shakhovska, N. B., Holoshchuk, R. O. (2011). Alhorytmy i struktury danykh. Lviv: Mahnoliia, 238.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Solodovnik, G., & Deynega, A. (2020). Development of an automated system for making multi-stage management decisions at industrial enterprises. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(54), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.210535

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2(54) (2020): Information and control systems

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Ganna Solodovnik, Alena Deynega

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.