Method for determining integral indicators quality of life for

Authors

  • Анатолий Иванович Рыбак International Humanitarian University, Fontansky road, 33, Odessa, Ukraine, 65009, Ukraine
  • Геннадий Сергеевич Панафидин International Humanitarian University, Fontansky road, 33, Odessa, Ukraine, 65009, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21223

Keywords:

analysis, model, method, a set of criteria, the assessment of quality of life, integral indicator

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of the quality of life, which is determined by the vital potential of society, social groups and individuals, and compliance characteristics of processes, tools, conditions and results of their positive social life needs, values and objectives. For valuation used the following methods: rating method, the method of linear scaling, the method of scoring, the method of assessing the quality of life of the population of the region relative to the group of regions. The variants of aggregate indicators of quality of life, reflecting certain qualitative properties of the system . Quality of life is based on the following principles: a comprehensive assessment; comprehensiveness and universality of the principle of the specificity of the research object. Based on the analysis of quality of life assessment models, proposed an integral indicator of the quality of life, including the following criteria: quality of the population, welfare, social security and environmental quality.

Author Biographies

Анатолий Иванович Рыбак, International Humanitarian University, Fontansky road, 33, Odessa, Ukraine, 65009

Skilful doctor, professor

Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security

Геннадий Сергеевич Панафидин, International Humanitarian University, Fontansky road, 33, Odessa, Ukraine, 65009

Graduate student

Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security

References

  1. Материалы интернет-сайта Государственного комитета статистики Российской Федерации [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: www/ URL: http://www.gks.ru/.
  2. Fromm, E. The Revolution of Hope [Text]/ E. Fromm. – New York – Evanston – London, 1968. – Р. 36.
  3. Базарова, А. Г. Территориальная дифференциация качества жизни населения республики Бурятия [Текст]: автореф. дис. на соиск. уч. степ. канд. геогр. наук./ А. Г. Базарова. – Улан -Удэ, 2001. – С. 11.
  4. Maitriser le Futur [Text]/ ed. Boris Pregel [Text]. – Paris, 1973. – Р. 47.
  5. Gabor, D. Innovation: Scientific, Technological and Social [Text]/ D. Gabor. – London: Oxford University Press, 1970. – Р. 51.
  6. Daniel, J. Deux idees neuves [Text] / J. Daniel // Le nouvel observatuer». – 1971. – Vol. X. – P. 4–10.
  7. Гаврилова, Т. В. Принципы и методы исследования качества жизни населения [Текст]/ Т. В. Гаврилова // Технологии качества жизни. – 2004. – Т. 4. – № 2.
  8. Дробышева, В. В. Оценка эффективности региональной программы управления качеством жизни [Текст]: дис. ... канд. экон. наук / В. В. Дробышева. – ТГТУ, 2004. – 174 с.
  9. Зубрилин, Ю. В. Стратегия повышения качества жизни населения региона [Текст]/ Ю. В. Зубрилин, Н. С. Маликов, С. В. Акимова // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. – 2003. – № 5. – С. 77–78.
  10. Szalai, A. The quality of life – comparative studies [Text]/ A. Szalai, F. M. Andrews. – Sage, London, 1980. – Р. 8.
  11. Айвазян, С. А. Интегральные индикаторы качества жизни населения : их построение и использование в социально-экономическом управлении и межрегиональных сопоставлениях [Текст]/ С. А. Айвазян. – М. : ЦЭМИ РАН, 2000. – С. 37.
  12. Materials of the website of the State Statistics Committee of the Russian Federation. Available: http://www.gks.ru/
  13. Fromm, E. (1968). The Revolution of Hope. New York – Evanston – London, 36.
  14. Bazarov, A. G. (2001). Territorial differentiation of the quality of life of the population of the republic of Buryatia. Dissertation author's abstract on scientific degree Jobseekers candidate of geographical sciences. Ulan-Ude, 11.
  15. In: Pregel, B. (1973). Maitriser le Futur. Paris, 47.
  16. Gabor, D. (1970). Innovation: Scientific, Technological and Social. London: Oxford University Press, 51.
  17. Daniel, J. (1971). Deux idees neuves. Le nouvel observatuer, Vol. X, 4–10.
  18. Gavrilova, T. V. (2004). Principles and methods of research quality of life. Quality of Life Technologies, T. 4, № 2.
  19. Drobysheva, V. V. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of the regional program management quality of life. TGTU, 174.
  20. Zubrilin, Yu. V., Malikov, N. S., Akimova, S. V. (2003). Strategy for improving the quality of life of the region. Living standards in the regions of Russia, № 5, 77-78.
  21. Szalai, A., Andrews, F. M. (1980). The quality of life – comparative studies. Sage, London, 8.
  22. Aivazyan, S. A. (2000). Integral indicators of quality of life: their construction and use of socio-economic governance and inter-regional comparisons. Moscow: CEMI, 37.

Published

2014-02-06

How to Cite

Рыбак, А. И., & Панафидин, Г. С. (2014). Method for determining integral indicators quality of life for. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(1(15), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21223

Issue

Section

Technology audit