Application of models and methods of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects in conditions of uncertainty and behavioral economics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.220298

Keywords:

scientific project, method of integrated risk management, increasing the efficiency of stakeholder management, «toxicity» indicator.

Abstract

The object of research is the processes of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects, including the project team, the main executors of the project (scientists) and other stakeholders, in conditions of uncertainty and behavioral economics. Today, scientists work in difficult conditions of uncertainty about the prospects for the development of science, technology and engineering. Therefore, it can lead to personnel risks, conflicts and behavioral economics and have a negative impact on the planning and implementation of scientific projects. The main hypothesis of the study is the assumption that the success of scientific projects depends on the effective management of their stakeholders in order to achieve their goals. It is necessary to systematically approach the analysis of stakeholders of scientific projects, the use of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects in conditions of uncertainty and behavioral economics. Based on the analysis of risk management methods in different areas of activity and taking into account the conceptual model of integrated risk management of scientific projects, a method of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects in uncertainty and behavioral economics was proposed. For the practical application of the developed models and methods of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects in conditions of uncertainty and behavioral economics, the scientific project was considered. Their use, even at the stage of initiating scientific projects, allowed the project manager and his/her team to calculate the indicator of «toxicity» for each alternative stakeholders and compare them with each other. It is based on data obtained in the process of assessing personnel risks, conflicts and factors of behavioral economics, which was conducted using the method of expert assessments. The indicator of «toxicity» is limited and should be close to zero. An example of choosing a stakeholder for the supply of stationery is considered. This result allowed to increase the efficiency of inclusion of stakeholders in the participants of the scientific project.

Author Biographies

Dmytro Bedrii, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko avе., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of IT Designing Training

Elena Danchenko, Cherkasy State Technological University, 460, Shevchenko blvd., Cherkasy, Ukraine, 18006

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Sciences and System Analysis

Inga Semko, Cherkasy State Technological University, 460, Shevchenko blvd., Cherkasy, Ukraine, 18006

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Electrical Systems

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2017). PMI, 574.
  2. International Project Management Association. Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management (2015). PMI, 415.
  3. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, 300. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815768
  4. Bas, D. V. (2018). Metod identyfikatsii steikkholderiv art-proektu. Upravlinnia proektamy u rozvytku suspilstva. Kyiv, 30–31.
  5. Teslia, Yu. M., Kubiavka, L. B. (2014). Kontseptsiia pobudovy ta funktsii systemy protyryzykovoho upravlinnia proiektamy u prohramakh informatyzatsii. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 19, 93–97.
  6. Bushuyev, S., Bushuiev, D. (2017). Emotional Intelligence – The Driver of Development of Breakthrough Competences of the Project. Proceedings 30th IPMA World Congress – Breakthrough competences for managing change. Astana, 8–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/stc-csit.2017.8099418
  7. Bushuiev, S. D., Bushuiev, D. A., Yaroshenko, R. F. (2018). Upravlinnia proiektamy v umovakh «povedinkovoi ekonomiky». Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 33, 22–30.
  8. Bedrii, D., Semko, I. (2019). Cognitive model for assessing the impact of personnel risks and conflicts in scientific projects. Science and Education a New Dimension. Natural and Technical Sciences, VII (206 (25)), 34–37. doi: http://doi.org/10.31174/send-nt2019-206vii25-08
  9. Kuzminska, Yu. M. (2014). Metod upravlinnia trudovymy resursamy osvitnikh proektiv. Upravlinnia proektamy: innovatsii, neliniinist, synerhetyka. Odesa, 122–125.
  10. Denchyk, O., Krol, K. (2019). Method of integrated risk managements for agroindustrial progects. Science and Education a New Dimension. Humanities and Social Sciences, VII (205 (34)), 25–29. doi: http://doi.org/10.31174/send-hs2019-205vii34-06
  11. Krul, K. Ya. (2019). Stakeholders risk management in agro-industrial projects. Proceedings of Scientific Works of Cherkasy State Technological University Series Economic Sciences, 55, 51–58. doi: http://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4420.0.55.2019.187408
  12. Savina, O., Sevostianova, A. (2020). Method of risk management of stakeholders of wind power projects. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 41, 35–43. doi: http://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2020.41.35-43
  13. Bedrii, D. (2020). Integrated anti-risk management of conflicts of a scientific project in a behavioral economics. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 3, 4–14.
  14. Bedrii, D. (2020). Development of a model of integrated risk and conflict management of scientific project stakeholders under conditions of behavioral economy. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3 (2 (53)), 9–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.207086
  15. Husieva, Yu. Yu., Martynenko, O. S., Chumachenko, I. V. (2018). Dynamichnii analiz metodiv ta instrumentalnykh zasobiv upravlinnia zatsikavlenymy storonamy proektiv. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 34, 27–36.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Bedrii, D., Danchenko, E., & Semko, I. (2020). Application of models and methods of integrated risk management of stakeholders of scientific projects in conditions of uncertainty and behavioral economics. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(2(56), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.220298

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2(56) (2020): Information and control systems

Section

Reports on research projects

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Dmytro Bedrii, Elena Danchenko, Inga Semko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.