Strategy of directions, forms and tools of state influence on development processes of the regional business environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.277797

Keywords:

business environment, development of entrepreneurship, state influence, development of the region

Abstract

The object of research is the content and factors of the formation and development of the regional business environment as an economic resource for the development of the region, its formation and effective use. Effective development of the regional business environment is a key factor in the sustainable functioning of business structures. Entrepreneurial activity ensures the improvement of the social situation in the regions, solving problems related to the employment of the population, the level of income of its working part, the income of local budgets, blocking centers of social tension. This necessitates the formation of an entrepreneurial environment that ensures the improvement of the efficiency of business structures, the activation of factors of its development operating at the macro-, meso-, micro- and nano-levels. Despite the growing interest of scientists and researchers in the study of problems related to the formation and development of the regional business environment, the search for factors affecting it, many issues of theoretical and methodological properties in this field of science and practical activity remain unresolved. This work is devoted to the study of these issues.

The results obtained in the course of the study can be used by the state authorities, which form state programs for stimulating the development of the business environment at the regional level. And also by entrepreneurs, investors, financial structures, analytical and rating agencies when making relevant decisions related to the development and assessment of the state of the business environment. A number of conclusions can be used for analytical purposes, the formation of comparative indices, ratings, establishment of business contacts that correspond to the mutual interests of interested parties, strategic planning of the development of various regions, etc. Separate provisions can be applied in the process of further research into scientific and practical problems of the formation and functioning of business territories, as well as used in higher educational institutions to prepare a scientific and methodological base for teaching.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Cherniaiev, Hryhorii Skovoroda University in Pereiaslav

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management, Practical Psychology and Inclusive Education

Nataliia Ihnatenko, Hryhorii Skovoroda University in Pereiaslav

PhD, Professor

Oleksandr Kovtun, Hryhorii Skovoroda University in Pereiaslav

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management, Practical Psychology and Inclusive Education

References

  1. Dykan, V. L., Zubenko, V. O., Makovoz, O. V., Tokmakova, I. V., Shramenko, O. V. (2013). Stratehichne upravlinnia. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 272.
  2. Maiorova, I. M. (2014). Vykorystannia prykladnykh siti lohistychnykh rishen dlia rozvytku turyzmu Pryazov’ia. Suchasni tekhnolohii upravlinnia turystychnym ta hotelno-restorannym biznesom. Mariupol: MDU, 4–5.
  3. Kaufman, B. E. (2003). The organization of economic activity: insights from the institutional theory of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52 (1), 71–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00153-1
  4. Peltzman, S. (2011). Ronald Coase and the Methodology of Economics. The Journal of Law and Economics, 54 (S4), S15–S29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/661943
  5. Singh, V. B. (1959). Adam Smith’s Theory of Economic Development. Science & Society, 23 (2), 107–132. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40400630
  6. Danilishin, B., Veklich, O. (2008). Ukraina v mezhdunarodnykh reitingakh ustoichivogo razvitiia. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 7, 13–23.
  7. Zakharova, S. H. (2008). Shliakhy udoskonalennia derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia turystychnoi sfery. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, 3, 81–87.
  8. Syzonenko, V. O. (1999). Pidpryiemnytstvo. Kyiv: Vikar, 435.
  9. Shershnova, Z. Ye. (2004). Stratehichne upravlinnia. Kyiv: KNEU, 699.
  10. Kindratska, H. I. (2010). Stratehichnyi menedzhment. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 406.
  11. Klivets, P. H. (2007). Stratehiia pidpryiemstva. Kyiv: Akademvydav, 320.
  12. Osovska, H. V., Fishchuk, O. L., Zhalinska, I. V. (2011). Stratehichnyi menedzhment. Kyiv: Kondor, 196.
  13. Kudenko, N. V. (2006). Stratehichnyi marketynh. Kyiv: KNEU, 152.
  14. Malska, M. P., Mandiuk, N. L., Zanko, Yu. S. (2012). Korporatyvne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 360.
Strategy of directions, forms and tools of state influence on development processes of the regional business environment

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Cherniaiev, O., Ihnatenko, N., & Kovtun, O. (2023). Strategy of directions, forms and tools of state influence on development processes of the regional business environment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(4(70), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.277797

Issue

Section

Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy