Justification of basic set of tools and methods of logistic controlling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52075

Keywords:

logistic controlling, instrumental and methodological support of logistic controlling, controlled performance

Abstract

The instrumental and methodological support of logistic controlling subsystem of the company is analyzed. A distribution logistic controlling of tools and methods by domestic and foreign scientists is overviewed. It is established that there is no generally accepted and universal set of tools and methods to logistic controlling. It is established that there is no consensus on the distribution of tools and methods into categories: tools and methods. That is often various scholars are included the tool to the tools and method of logistic controlling. A similar situation is classified for the methods. The expediency of category leveling of machine tools and methods of logistic controlling is proved. It is adopted a single set of tools/methods for logistic controlling are not separating them into categories. The necessity of forming a basic list of tools/methods for logistic controlling to implement logistic controlling subsystems in the overall system management is proved. It is identified that the proposed set of tools/methods for logistic controlling allow to fully ensuring the realization of its goals and objectives.

Author Biography

Орися Андріївна Русановська, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», st. Stepan Bandera, 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79000

PhD student

Department of Marketing and Logistics

References

  1. Naid'onov,O. G. (2010). Іnformatizatsіia iak golovna іdeia tret'ogo tisiacholіttia. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional'nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriia «Filosofiia. Kul'turologiia. Politologiia. Sotsiologiia», Vol. 23 (62), № 2, 161–165.
  2. Romanenko, O. O. (2014). Vplyv merezhi Internet na diialnist promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Ekonomichnyi visnyk. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva, 4, 141–147.
  3. Carlton, J. (1997). Apple: The inside Story of Intrigue, Egomania, and Business Blunders. New York: Random House Inc., 463.
  4. PC Outlook Remains Cautious, Despite Modest Third Quarter Gains, According to IDC. (2014, November 25). IDC Research, Inc. Available: http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25267114
  5. Matviienko, H. L. (2005). Osnovnyi instrumentarii kontrolinhu na ukrainskykh pidpryiemstvakh. Nauchno-tekhnycheskyi sbornyk, 61, 175–180.
  6. Kartseva, V. V. (2010). Systematyzatsiia instrumentariiu kontrolinhu na pidpryiemstvi: teoretychnyi aspekt. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoho universytetu derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy, 1, 118–127.
  7. Mann, R., Maier, E., Ivashkevicha, V. B., Zhukova, Yu. G. (1995). Kontrolling dlia nachinaiushchih. Ed. 2. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 304.
  8. Anan'kina, E. A., Danilochkin, S. V., Danilochkina, N. G. (1998). Kontrolling kak instrument upravleniia predpriiatiem. Moscow: Audit, IuNITI, 279.
  9. Pushkar, M. S. (1997). Kontrolinh. Ternopil, 146.
  10. Tyshchenko, O. I. (2011). Operatyvnyi kontrolinh v upravlinni vyrobnychymy zatratamy elektrotekhnichnykh pidpryiemstv. Luhansk, 20.
  11. Bazhan, I. I. (2006). Kontrolinh. Donetsk: TOV «Yuho-Vostok, Ltd», 211.
  12. Darmanska, H. O., Svod, L. V. (2002). Kontrolinh. Khmelnytskyi: TUP, 107.
  13. Storozhyk, M. I., Holubiatnikova, N. V. (2004). Kontrolinh. Lviv: LRIDU NADU, 210.
  14. Prokhorova, V. V., Martiusheva, L. S., Petrusevych, N. Yu., Prokhorova, Yu. V. (2006). Kontrolinh vid teorii do realizatsii na praktytsi. Kharkiv: VD «INZhEK», 200.
  15. Maliarets, L. M., Matviienko-Biliaieva, H. L. (2010). Formalizatsiia zadach u kontrolinhu lohistychnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Kharkiv: KhNEU, 228.
  16. Sierpinska, M., Niedbala, B. (2003). Controlling operacyjny w predsiebiorstwie centra odpowiedzialnosci w teorii i praktyce. Warzawa: Wydawnictwo Nakowe PWN, 421.
  17. Pisz, І. (2011). Controlling of logistics projects. Total logistic management, 4, 107–123.
  18. Kolinski, A., Trajanovska, J., Pajak, E. (2015). Theory of constraints as supporting element of logistics controlling. Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology, 71–84.
  19. Kalaitan, T. V. (2009). Kontrolinh: problemy terminolohii. Visnyk Lvivskoi komertsiinoi akademii. Seriia ekonomichna, 30, 43–47.
  20. Chikita, I. (2013). Elastychnist popytu na kredyty yak faktor pidvyshchennia vplyvu bankivskoi systemy na ekonomichne zrostannia. Visnyk NBU. Finansovyi rynok. Makroekonomika, 52–56.
  21. Chornopyska, N. V. (2008). Metodychni pidkhody otsiniuvannia lohistychnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», Lohistyka, 623, 265–271.
  22. Krykavskyi, Ye. (2005). Lohistychne upravlinnia. Lviv: Natsionalnyi universytet «Lvivska polekhnika», 684.
  23. Rudenko, H. R. (2011). Innovatsiinist zviazku obliku, analizu, kontroliu ta audytu lohistychnykh vytrat pidpryiemstv. Problemy nauky, 5, 40–47.
  24. Perevozova, I. V. (2014). Adaptatsiini aspekty zastosuvannia ekonomichnoi ekspertyzy v konturakh nimetskoi modeli kontrolinhu pidpryiemstva. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia ta problemy rozvytku, 797, 403–409.
  25. Prokopenko, O. V., Kryvoruchko, L. B. (2011). Ekonomichna sut kontrolinhu, yoho mistse v systemi upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom. Visnyk SumDU. Seriia «Ekonomika», 4, 27–34.
  26. Petrovych, Y. M., Panas, Ya. V. (2013). Evoliutsiia kontrolinhu v suchasnii teorii ta praktytsi upravlinnia vitchyznianymy pidpryiemstvamy. Menedzhment i marketynh innovatsii, 1, 129–137.

Published

2015-09-22

How to Cite

Русановська, О. А. (2015). Justification of basic set of tools and methods of logistic controlling. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(5(25), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52075