Development of the complex description of business processes in the organization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74568

Keywords:

business process, comprehensive description, meaningful description, graphic description, formal description, description for program implementation

Abstract

The analysis of graphic and formal methods and techniques for description of business processes is conducted.

It is revealed the lack of a common approach to information presenting of all business processes lifecycle. The proposed information technology for combining different descriptions in a unit and methods of transition from one description mode to another is not yet possible to implement without loss of information and ensuring all participants of business processes lifecycle in a single conceptual framework.

A comprehensive interrelated description of all aspects of business processes is proposed. This description appears in text, image, formal and algorithmic species as different forms of a single process models, which complement each other and can best solve various problems.

This approach provides a convenient way of describing the process by specialists of different levels: from the head in the conceptual process design (planning) to direct performer during his work in securing the conditions for monitoring and control process.

The basis for the creation of an information technology and software environment for planning, modeling, analysis, support and performance management of business processes is developed.

Author Biographies

Вікторія Петрівна Захарченко, Sumy State University, 2, Rymskogo-Korsakova str., Sumy, 40007

Assistant

Department of computer science

Анна Вікторівна Марченко, Sumy State University, 2, Rymskogo-Korsakova str., Sumy, 40007

Candidate of Technical Science, Associate Professor

Department of computer science

Віктор Григорович Неня, Sumy State University, 2, Rymskogo-Korsakova str., Sumy, 40007

Candidate of Technical Science, Associate Professor

Department of computer science

Руслан Петрович Окопний, Sumy State University, 2, Rymskogo-Korsakova str., Sumy, 40007

PhD student

Department of computer science

References

  1. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A. (2012, January). BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 34, № 1, 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002
  2. Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F. (2013). A Formal Account of WS-BPEL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Science + Business Media, 199–215. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68265-3_13
  3. Laskey, K. B., Laskey, K. (2009, July). Service oriented architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, Vol. 1, № 1, 101–105. doi:10.1002/wics.8
  4. Gritsyk, V. I., Kosmin, V. V. (2000). Terminy i poniatiia (slovar'): Transport. Stroitel'stvo. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Marketing. Sistemotehnika. Informatika. Moscow: UMK MPS Rossii, 537.
  5. Ivchenko, A. O. (2002). Tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Kharkiv: FOLIO, 543.
  6. Ferreira, P., Martinho, R., Domingos, D. (2014). Process Invariants: An Approach to Model Expected Exceptions. Procedia Technology, Vol. 16, 824–833. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.032
  7. Pillat, R. M., Oliveira, T. C., Alencar, P. S. C., Cowan, D. D. (2015, January). BPMNt: A BPMN extension for specifying software process tailoring. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 57, 95–115. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.004
  8. Awad, A., Sakr, S. (2012, December). On efficient processing of BPMN-Q queries. Computers in Industry, Vol. 63, № 9, 867–881. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.06.002
  9. Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Batoulis, K., Fahland, D., Weske, M. (2015, October). Automating data exchange in process choreographies. Information Systems, Vol. 53, 296–329. doi:10.1016/j.is.2015.03.008
  10. Respício, A., Domingos, D. (2015). Reliability of BPMN Business Processes. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 64, 643–650. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.578
  11. Correia, A., e Abreu, F. B. (2012). Adding Preciseness to BPMN Models. Procedia Technology, Vol. 5, 407–417. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.045
  12. Juric, M. B. (2010, October). WSDL and BPEL extensions for Event Driven Architecture. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 52, № 10, 1023–1043. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.04.005
  13. Krizevnik, M., Juric, M. B. (2012, December). Data-bound variables for WS-BPEL executable processes. Computer Languages, Systems & Structures, Vol. 38, № 4, 279–299. doi:10.1016/j.cl.2012.06.001
  14. Marwaha, P., Banati, H., Bedi, P. (2013, July 31). Formalizing BPEL-TC Through Π-Calculus. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, Vol. 4, № 3, 11–21. doi:10.5121/ijwest.2013.4302
  15. Mazanek, S., Hanus, M. (2011, February). Constructing a bidirectional transformation between BPMN and BPEL with a functional logic programming language. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Vol. 22, № 1, 66–89. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.11.005
  16. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bisgaard Lassen, K. (2008, February). Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: Theory and implementation. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50, № 3, 131–159. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2006.11.004
  17. Dijkman, R. M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C. (2008, November). Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50, № 12, 1281–1294. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.02.006
  18. Zakharchenko, V., Nenia, V. (2013). Information model of the design process of technical objects. In Processing of the 1st International Conference «Computer Science & Engineering 2013». Lviv, Ukraine, 198–199.

Published

2016-07-26

How to Cite

Захарченко, В. П., Марченко, А. В., Неня, В. Г., & Окопний, Р. П. (2016). Development of the complex description of business processes in the organization. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(30), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74568

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research