Development of the complex description of business processes in the organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.74568Keywords:
business process, comprehensive description, meaningful description, graphic description, formal description, description for program implementationAbstract
The analysis of graphic and formal methods and techniques for description of business processes is conducted.
It is revealed the lack of a common approach to information presenting of all business processes lifecycle. The proposed information technology for combining different descriptions in a unit and methods of transition from one description mode to another is not yet possible to implement without loss of information and ensuring all participants of business processes lifecycle in a single conceptual framework.
A comprehensive interrelated description of all aspects of business processes is proposed. This description appears in text, image, formal and algorithmic species as different forms of a single process models, which complement each other and can best solve various problems.
This approach provides a convenient way of describing the process by specialists of different levels: from the head in the conceptual process design (planning) to direct performer during his work in securing the conditions for monitoring and control process.
The basis for the creation of an information technology and software environment for planning, modeling, analysis, support and performance management of business processes is developed.
References
- Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A. (2012, January). BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 34, № 1, 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002
- Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F. (2013). A Formal Account of WS-BPEL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Science + Business Media, 199–215. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68265-3_13
- Laskey, K. B., Laskey, K. (2009, July). Service oriented architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, Vol. 1, № 1, 101–105. doi:10.1002/wics.8
- Gritsyk, V. I., Kosmin, V. V. (2000). Terminy i poniatiia (slovar'): Transport. Stroitel'stvo. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Marketing. Sistemotehnika. Informatika. Moscow: UMK MPS Rossii, 537.
- Ivchenko, A. O. (2002). Tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Kharkiv: FOLIO, 543.
- Ferreira, P., Martinho, R., Domingos, D. (2014). Process Invariants: An Approach to Model Expected Exceptions. Procedia Technology, Vol. 16, 824–833. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.032
- Pillat, R. M., Oliveira, T. C., Alencar, P. S. C., Cowan, D. D. (2015, January). BPMNt: A BPMN extension for specifying software process tailoring. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 57, 95–115. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.004
- Awad, A., Sakr, S. (2012, December). On efficient processing of BPMN-Q queries. Computers in Industry, Vol. 63, № 9, 867–881. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.06.002
- Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Batoulis, K., Fahland, D., Weske, M. (2015, October). Automating data exchange in process choreographies. Information Systems, Vol. 53, 296–329. doi:10.1016/j.is.2015.03.008
- Respício, A., Domingos, D. (2015). Reliability of BPMN Business Processes. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 64, 643–650. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.578
- Correia, A., e Abreu, F. B. (2012). Adding Preciseness to BPMN Models. Procedia Technology, Vol. 5, 407–417. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.045
- Juric, M. B. (2010, October). WSDL and BPEL extensions for Event Driven Architecture. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 52, № 10, 1023–1043. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.04.005
- Krizevnik, M., Juric, M. B. (2012, December). Data-bound variables for WS-BPEL executable processes. Computer Languages, Systems & Structures, Vol. 38, № 4, 279–299. doi:10.1016/j.cl.2012.06.001
- Marwaha, P., Banati, H., Bedi, P. (2013, July 31). Formalizing BPEL-TC Through Π-Calculus. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, Vol. 4, № 3, 11–21. doi:10.5121/ijwest.2013.4302
- Mazanek, S., Hanus, M. (2011, February). Constructing a bidirectional transformation between BPMN and BPEL with a functional logic programming language. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Vol. 22, № 1, 66–89. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.11.005
- Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bisgaard Lassen, K. (2008, February). Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: Theory and implementation. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50, № 3, 131–159. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2006.11.004
- Dijkman, R. M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C. (2008, November). Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50, № 12, 1281–1294. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.02.006
- Zakharchenko, V., Nenia, V. (2013). Information model of the design process of technical objects. In Processing of the 1st International Conference «Computer Science & Engineering 2013». Lviv, Ukraine, 198–199.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Вікторія Петрівна Захарченко, Анна Вікторівна Марченко, Віктор Григорович Неня, Руслан Петрович Окопний
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.