Building of multi-factor model of world university ranking systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.75712

Keywords:

multi-factor model, world university ranking systems, factor analysis, retrospective analysis

Abstract

Now we have a lot of world ranking system that are based on a set of indicators for the universities evaluation, so it is difficult determine which indicators are essential in the ranking systems. So the aim of the article is to provide an integrated multi-factor model of university ranking systems. The influential world and world university ranking systems are analyzed. Factor analysis of the influential world and world university ranking systems based on a retrospective analysis of three years were applied. Research in several groups and with normalized ranking indicators values for stable and the objective result was conducted. Integrated multi-factor model of world university ranking systems is proposed. The proposed model allows to evaluate the majority of the world's universities.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Kavitska, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Avenue Shevchenko, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Senior Lecturer

Department of System Software 

 

Vira Liubchenko, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Avenue Shevchenko, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of System Software 

References

  1. Reitynh vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv III-IV rivniv akredytatsii MONmolodsportu za 2010/2011 navchalnyi rik. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Available: http://old.mon.gov.ua/ua/activity/education/58/rejting/. Last accessed: 01.04.2016.
  2. Mmantsetsa, M., Peter, J. W., Silvia, F. (2014, January 22). University Rankings: The Many Sides of the Debate. Management of Sustainable Development, Vol. 6, № 1, 39–42. doi:10.2478/msd-2014-0006
  3. Hazelkorn, E.; In: Hazelkorn, E., Wells, P., Marope, M. (2013). World-class universities or world-class systems?: Rankings and higher education policy choices. Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses. Paris: UNESCO, 71–94.
  4. Huang, Mu-Hsuan. (2011, June). A Comparison of Three Major Academic Rankings for World Universities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, Vol. 9, № 1, 1–25.
  5. Academic Ranking of World Universities. Available: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ru/aboutarwu.html. Last accessed: 07.04.2016.
  6. QS World University Rankings. Available: http://www.topuniversities.com. Last accessed: 07.04.2016.
  7. Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. Last accessed: 08.04.2016.
  8. CWTS Leiden Ranking. Available: http://www.leidenranking.com. Last accessed: 08.04.2016.
  9. Ranking Web of Universities. Available: http://www.webometrics.info. Last accessed: 09.04.2016.
  10. Scimago Institutions Rankings. Available: http://www.scimagoir.com. Last accessed: 09.04.2016.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-26

How to Cite

Kavitska, V., & Liubchenko, V. (2016). Building of multi-factor model of world university ranking systems. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(30), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.75712

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research