Research of theoretical basis of business model quality management of restaurant business entity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.94171

Keywords:

quality management, enterprise business model, restaurant business, demands of consumers, innovative approach

Abstract

The key points of «quality management» concept (as management function, management process and a system of evaluation of management activities) are identified on the basis of critical analysis of invariant interpretations of its essence These characteristics indicate the complexity of «quality control» concept and the ambiguity of its contents. Based on a synthesis of existing approaches to the interpretation of the essence of «quality management» concept including industry features of restaurant business entity, its basic essential features are defined (aim of management, objectives, object, subject, methods and means of management, functional orientation, time lag, value priorities) and the author's vision of the contents of «business model quality management of restaurant business entity» is formulated as a coordinated activity that is controlling the value propositions (range, food sales concept, service level), key partners, consumer segments, key resources, cost structure, relationships with customers, revenue streams.

Trends of development of explored «quality control» concept and general management are investigated to determine the preferred approach to building a quality management system of enterprise business model. It is proved that quality improvement of enterprise business model is based on an innovative approach to management at all stages of production, distribution, exchange and consumption.

Author Biographies

Victoria Grosul, Kharkiv State University of Food Technology and Trade, Klochkovskystr., 333, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61051

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Tatyana Ivanova, Kharkiv State University of Food Technology and Trade, Klochkovskystr., 333, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61051

Kharkiv State University of Food Technology and Trade,

Klochkovskystr., 333, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61051

References

  1. Kyslytsyn, V. O.; Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine. (2009). Rozvytok systemy upravlinnia yakistiu na pidpryiemstvi. Donetsk, 188.
  2. Simenko, I. V.; In: Shubin, O. O. (2009). Yakist system upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy: metodolohiia, orhanizatsiia, praktyka. Donetsk: Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky, 394.
  3. Potapchik, O. A. (2013). System-categorical research the quality in the management system. Odesa National University Herald. Economy, 2/1 (18), 9–104.
  4. Samoilenko, I. O., Ostapenko, K. O. (2014). Sotsialno-ekonomichna sutnist poniattia «yakist menedzhmentu» ta yii zabezpechennia v umovakh rynku. Komunalne hospodarstvo mist, 113, 245–252.
  5. Bibik, Yu. V. (2003). Ekonomichni aspekty sertyfikatsii produktsii ta system upravlinnia yakistiu za mizhnarodnymy standartamy: PhD thesis. Kharkiv, 227.
  6. Kalyta, T. V. (2010). Vzaiemozviazok upravlinnia yakosti i yakosti upravlinnia. Zbirnyk tez dopovidei IX Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii «Problemy ekonomiky transportu», 22–23 kvitnia 2010 r. Dnipropetrovsk: DNUZT, 58.
  7. Krainev, V. A. (2004). K voprosu ob effektivnosti sistemy menedzhmenta. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva, 9, 21–26.
  8. Dada, O. (Lola), Watson, A., Kirby, D. (2015). Entrepreneurial tendencies in franchising: evidence from the UK. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22 (1), 82–98. doi:10.1108/jsbed-11-2011-0021
  9. Strekalova, N. (2009). Business model concept: methodology of system analysis. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Science, 92, 95–105.
  10. Dorf, R. C., Raitanen, M. (1997). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action [Book Reviews]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44 (3), 330–331. doi:10.1109/tem.1997.618174
  11. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 288.
  12. Freese, W. (2012). You Cannot Manage, What You Cannot Measure. Praxishandbuch Corporate Magazines. Springer Nature, 202–217. doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-3702-5_18
  13. Okrepilov, V. V. (2008). Upravlenie kachestvom. Ed. 2. Moscow: Ekonomika, 639.
  14. Karpenko, E. M., Komkov, S. Yu. (2007). Menedzhment kachestva. Minsk: IVTs Minfina, 208.
  15. Mazur, I. I., Shapiro, V. D.; In: Mazur, I. I. (2003). Upravlenie kachestvom. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 334.
  16. Shapoval, M. I. (2007). Menedzhment yakosti. Ed. 3. Kyiv: Znannia, KOO, 471.
  17. Bastrykin, D. V., Evseichev, A. I., Nizhegorodov, E. V. et al.; In: Gerasimov, B. I. (2006). Upravlenie kachestvom na promyshlennom predpriiatii. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 204.
  18. Kontseptsiia. Gufo.me. Available: http://mirslovarei.com/content_bes/koncepcija-29626.html. Last accessed: 03.01.2017.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Grosul, V., & Ivanova, T. (2017). Research of theoretical basis of business model quality management of restaurant business entity. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(33), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.94171

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research