Analysis of the actual directions of the management of national productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98321Keywords:
national productivity, socio-labor relations, economic development, social efficiencyAbstract
The important factor that determines the national economic development is the national productivity that determines institutional structure of national economy and limits or widens its possibilities to react on new challenges. The productivity of national economy is a cornerstone that the long-term stable economic development cannot be attained without.
The aim of the article is to analyze the priority factors of the national productivity formation and the search for the ways of influencing it by the state and society.
The growth of national productivity needs the proportionate complementarity of social and economic components of national development that becomes mainly the result of not economic changes but social ones. Social context, gaining more and more influence on national productivity, determines also the urgent directions of national management.
The management of national productivity is based on the formation of stable socio-economic relations. In modern conditions the effectiveness of socio-economic relations depends on human factor and synchronously influences its development. The elements of socio-labor relations that play the important role in national productivity formation are the main parameters of labor life: conditions and content of labor, organization of labor activity, labor payment, labor guarantees, labor prestige, motives and stimuli. Within labor activity takes place the widening of social connections, increase of self-appraisal at the expanse of feeling of own contribution in common matter. The combination of economic and social effectiveness of labor is the important factor of long-term positive trend of national productivity.
More productive economy can support a higher wage and higher profit and also widening of free time and higher life quality. The modern socio-labor policy must be built based on understanding of the priority role of human, its creative abilities in social reproduction.
The management of national productivity must be of system character that provides transformation of the results of previous economic development in stable future development. The important aspects of the national productivity management include the support of the quality of socio-labor sphere development, conditions of realization of main competitive advantage of the country – high-educated and creative working force. The management of national productivity must have close connections with other directions of state policy, especially innovative, educational, social and so on.
References
- Libanova, E. M. (2015). Pratsia zadlia liudskoho rozvytku: Ukraina 2015. Available: http://www.idss.org.ua/arhiv/2015_17_12Lib.pptx
- Human Development Report 2015: Work for Human Development: United Nations Development Programme. (2015). New York, 288.
- Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 356.
- Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 185. doi:10.1515/9781400834181
- Alier, J. M. (2009). Socially Sustainable Economic De-growth. Development and Change, 40 (6), 1099–1119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x
- Decent work: some strategic challenges ahead. (2008). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 34.
- Tiutiunnikova, S. V. (2013). Dostoinyi trud v strukture rosta finansovogo potentsiala domohoziaistv. Materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Finansovyi potentsial subiektiv hospodariuvannia yak chynnyk staloho rozvytku rynkovoi ekonomiky». Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 333–337.
- Halchynskyi, A. S. (2010). Ekonomichna metodolohiia. Lohika onovlennia. Kurs lektsii. Kyiv: ADEF – Ukraina, 572.
- Florida, R. L. (2014). The Rise of the Creative Class – Revisited: Revised and Expanded. Basic Books, 512.
- Kolot, A. M. (2010). Sotsialno-trudova sfera: stan vidnosyn, novi vyklyky, tendentsii rozvytku. Kyiv: KNEU, 251.
- Bohynia, D. P., Semikina, M. V. (2003). Mentalnyi chynnyk u sferi pratsi: problemy teorii ta praktyky. Kyiv: Shtorm, 382.
- Kim, M. N. (2015). Ekonomika truda i sotsial'no-trudovye otnosheniia. Kharkiv: Tochka, 308.
- Berger, N., Fisher, P. (2013, August 22). A Well-Educated Workforce Is Key to State Prosperity. Economic Policy Institute. Available: http://www.epi.org/publication/states-education-productivity-growth-foundations/
- Wilkinson, R. G., Pickett, K. E. (2009). Income Inequality and Social Dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35 (1), 493–511. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115926
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Oksana Berveno, Anastasiya Moskvina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
