Ecological consequences of intensification of agricultural production.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2020.226636

Keywords:

land use, soil, agriculture, agroecosystem, food security

Abstract

The problem of intensification of agricultural production in the conditions of rapidly growing population is highlighted. In agriculture, their severity is even more pronounced, because this sector of the economy has always been characterized by its problems and actively attracted public attention. Among these problems and unsolved problems, recently, issues related to the intensification of agricultural production, which has significant features, have become especially relevant. Its consistent implementation affects important aspects of agricultural theory, primarily related to the law of declining soil fertility, the theory and conditions of formation of differential land rent. From a practical point of view, the intensification of agricultural production, the driving force of which is scientific and technological progress and systemic technical and technological transformations, provides a set of measures to ensure environmental sustainability, rationalization of nature. Their scientific and theoretical development becomes an objective necessity in the formation of a market economy and market relations. The management practice of agricultural enterprises requires a deeper justification of measures to intensify agricultural production. Thus, the intensification of agriculture is not only a vital economic strategy, but also largely social. After all, the formation and development of agricultural production on the basis of intensification provides income to enterprises in the agricultural sector, which will improve the living conditions of the rural population.

Author Biographies

O. Chumachenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences

Y. Kryvoviaz, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences

V. Hrehul, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Master

References

Ahrotsentr. Silske hospodarstvo‎. ‎ekolohichni problemy s/h. (2020). [Agrocenter. Agriculture. Environmental problems of agriculture]. Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/agrocentr123/silske-gospodarstvo/ekologicni-problemi-s-g. [in Ukrainian].

Borisov A.B. (2020). Bolshoi эkonomycheskyi slovar [Big Dictionary of Economics]. Moscow: «Knizhnyy mir» [in Russian].

Vazhynsky F.А., Nodjak L.S., Shulgan Y.B. (2020). Tekhniko-tekhnolohichne onovlennia yak faktor intensyfikatsii vyrobnytstva [Technical and technological renewal as a factor of production intensification]. Retrieved from: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/2577/st_36_05.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Ekolohichni naslidky khimizatsii silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva. (2020). [Environmental consequences of chemicalization of agricultural production]. Retrieved from: http://referat-ok.com.ua/ekologiya/ekologichni-naslidki-himizaciji-silskogospodarskogo-virobnictva [in Ukrainian].

Zbarsky V.K., Babienko M.F., Kulaets M.M., Sinyavskaya I.M., Khomenko M.P. (Ed.). (2013). Ekonomika silskoho hospodarstva: navch. posib. [Economics of agriculture: textbook. way.]. Kyiv: Ahroosvita [in Ukrainian].

Mochernyy S.V. (2000). Ekonomichna entsyklopediia: u 3-kh tomakh [Economic encyclopedia: in 3 volu­mes]. (Vol. 1). Кyiv: Vydavnychyy tsentr «Akademiya» [in Ukrainian].

Yevrostat. Dani. (2020). [Eurostat. Data]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data. [in English].

Marks K., Enhel’s F. (1962). Marks K. Tvory. [Marx K. Works.]. (Vol. 24). Кyiv: Vydavnytstvo politychnoyi literatury Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].

Marks K., Enhel’s F. (1962). Marks K. Tvory. [Marx K. Works]. (Vol. 25 Р.ІІ). Кyiv: Vydavnytstvo poli­tychnoyi literatury Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].

Rayzberh B.A., Lozovskyy L.SH. & Starodubtseva E.B. (1999). Sovremennyi ekonomycheskyi slovar [Modern Economic Dictionary]. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].

Sabluk P., et al. (2011). Natsionalna doktryna prodovolchoi bezpeky Ukrainy [National doctrine of food security of Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK. — Economics of agro-industrial complex, 8, 3–11 [in Ukrai­nian].

Dubinina A.A. et al. (2015). Tovaroznavstvo. Kharchovi produkty z henetychno modyfikovanoi syrovyny T 50: navch. Posibnyk [Commodity science. Food products from genetically modified raw materials. T. 50: textbook. manual]. Kharkiv: HDYHT [in Ukrainian].

Furdychko O.I. (2014). Ahroekolohiia: monohr. [Agroecology: monograph]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].

Hvesik M.A. & Golyan V.A. (2007). Instytutsionalna model pryrodokorystuvannia v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv: Monohrafiia [Institutional model of nature management in the context of global challenges: Monograph]. Kyiv: Condor [in Ukrainian].

Сrispy.news. V kakykh stranakh hmo-produkty zapreshcheny. (2020). [crispy.news. In which countries are GM foods banned]. Retrieved from: https://crispy.news/2019/10/28/food-sovet/v-kakih-stranah-gmo-produkty-zapreshheny/ [in Russian]

Published

2020-08-18

Issue

Section

ECONOMY