Improving the assessment of eco-oriented development management of agricultural enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2025.346180

Keywords:

scenario-based approach, evaluation model, management, financial incentives, monitoring, greening, sustainable development

Abstract

The harmonization of the national environmental management system with European standards will serve as a key prerequisite for achieving sustainable development of domestic agricultural production. Therefore, the study is based on a systemic approach that includes the analysis of Ukrainian regulatory and legal acts and EU documents, international standards ISO 14001 and EMAS, as well as the application of situational modeling elements (pessimistic, moderate, and optimistic scenarios). The use of the scenario approach is considered as a tool for adapting management decisions to different economic and political conditions, which is particularly important in wartime and post-war contexts. The developed conceptual model for assessing the management systems of eco-oriented development of agricultural enterprises plays a special role in times of crisis and postcrisis recovery and envisages the integration of economic, environmental, social, and innovation indicators. Its application is appropriate at various levels of management: by state authorities — in the process of forming targeted programs for supporting the agricultural sector, by advisory services — in providing scientifically grounded recommendations, by agricultural enterprises — for strategic planning and assessing their own ecooriented activities. The implementation and improvement of the proposed model are aimed at enhancing the competitiveness of domestic agricultural enterprises, ensuring effective decision-making, building trust among stakeholders, and expanding opportunities for attracting green investments.

References

  1. Drebot, O. I., & Demianiuk, O. S. (2025). Key determinants of the green economy for the development of the domestic agricultural sector. Investytsii: Praktyka ta Dosvid, 2, 70–75. doi: 10.32702/2306-6814.2025.2.70
  2. Dobriak, D. S., Drebot, D. I., Melnyk, P. P., & Sakharnytska, P. I. (2020). State and prospects of development of ecological and economic integration of land use in the agricultural sector. Balanced Nature Using, 3, 6–23. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.3.2020.212596
  3. Mishenin, Ye. V., & Yarova, I. Ye. (2024). Assessment of eco-destructive agricultural nature management and economic and legal responsibility in the system of land relations: Methodological aspect. Balanced Nature Using, 3, 14–21. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.3.2024.314825
  4. Shkuratov, O. I., & Chudovska, V. A. (2024). Methodology for integrated assessment of the level of innovative activity of the economy. Open Science and Innovation, 1(1), 62–72. doi: 10.62405/osi.2024.01.05
  5. Orsato, R. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.
  6. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
  7. Pereira Sánchez, Á., & Vence Deza, X. (2015). Environmental policy instruments and eco-innovation: An overview of recent studies. Innovar, 25(58), 65–80. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v25n58.52426
  8. Polishchuk, V. M., Mudrak, D. O., & Mudrak, O. V. (2024). System analysis of environmental quality in Europe through the prism of ecological and economic indicators. Balanced Nature Using, 2, 42–55. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.2.2024.309921
  9. Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., Lade, S. J., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., & Zhang, X. (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature, 619(7968), 102–111. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8
  10. Okhota, Yu., Chikov, I., & Bilokinna, I. (2024). Conceptual polycomponent model of the innovative mechanism for increasing the competitiveness of agro-industrial complex enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 10(2), 196–210. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-2-196-210
  11. Matviichuk, N., Kolenda, N., Stashchuk, O., Tesliuk, S., & Sydoruk, S. (2021). Legal support of budget financing of environmental protection activities in Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(38), 465–473. doi: 10.18371/fcaptp.v3i38.237479
  12. Shkuratov, O. I., & Chudovska, V. A. (2022). Conceptual principles of organizational and economic support for environmental safety of territories. Ekonomika ta Derzhava, 6, 4–9. doi: 10.32702/2306-6806.2022.6.4
  13. Skorokhod, I., & Horbach, L. (2021). Innovation and investment support of regional environmentally safe development. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(38), 456–464. doi: 10.18371/fcaptp.v3i38.237478
  14. Solodovnik, O. (2023). Financial support for sustainable development of enterprises. Economy and Society, 49. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-49-17
  15. Rybachuk, V. P. (2021). Theoretical and methodological assessments of the formation of an innovative model of the agricultural sector based on sustainable development principles. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 3(111), 20–28. doi: 10.31521/2313-092X/2021-3(111)-3

Published

2025-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles