Current status and study of the problem of alien plant species spread in agroecosystems of Ukraine: global challenges and national prospects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2025.346182

Keywords:

invasive species, phytobiota, agroecosystem, invasion, biological pollution, flora

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the scientific achievements of Ukrainian researchers in studying the problem of the spread of alien (adventive) plant species on the territory of Ukraine. Based on the systematization of a significant body of literature (including monographs, articles in leading professional journals, and proceedings of international and national conferences), the results of studies dedicated to the adventive fraction of the phytobiota actively invading ecosystems across various regions of Ukraine are described in detail. These studies cover a wide range of issues, from the taxonomic identification of alien species to the assessment of the ecological consequences of invasive processes. Ukrainian scientists apply diverse methodological approaches, including classic floristic and geobotanical descriptions, long-term monitoring of the spread dynamics of key invasive species, experimental research into their competitive interactions with native flora, and mathematical modeling of potential distribution ranges. The main contribution lies in the systematic collection, in-depth systematization, generalization, and comprehensive ecological and botanical analysis of data on adventive species. This includes critical information regarding introduction pathways, the rate of their propagation, the adaptive mechanisms ensuring their success, and the degree of impact on indigenous coenoses. Particular emphasis is placed on investigating the ecological niches effectively occupied by adventive species and their aggressive ability to displace native species, often leading to the formation of monodominant communities and a reduction in local biodiversity. It has been determined that the key factors contributing to successful adventisation are significant disturbances to natural ecosystems resulting from intense anthropogenic activity. These include intensive agricultural production, rapid urbanization, the construction of transportation routes (which serve as dispersal corridors), and global climate change. The study highlights that investigating the processes of invasion and adventisation of the Ukrainian flora is of paramount importance in the context of biological pollution (bio-threats) and ensuring biodiversity conservation. Biological pollution caused by invasive species constitutes a significant threat to ecological stability, sustainable economic development, and even public health. The research conducted by Ukrainian scientists enables a precise assessment of the problem’s scale and the identification of the most aggressive invasive transformer species, which is a necessary foundation for developing effective strategies for their control and management. The research materials convincingly confirm that the dynamics of adventive species spread directly correlate with the level of anthropogenic load. The increasing intensity of human economic activity (including unregulated deforestation, massive ploughing of lands, recreational overload, as well as changes in the hydrological regime of territories) causes the degradation of natural ecosystems. This, in turn, creates ideal conditions for the penetration, establishment, and expansion of alien species by reducing the competitiveness of the native flora

References

  1. Kotov, M. I. (1929). Adventive plants of the Ukrainian SSR. Znannia, 2, 28–32.
  2. Protopopova, V. V. (1973). Adventive plants of the Forest-Steppe and Steppe of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  3. Burda, R. I., Pashkevych, N. A., Boiko, H. V., & Fitsailo, T. V. (2015). Alien species of protected floras of the ForestSteppe zone of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  4. Kurdiukova, O. M., & Tyshchuk, O. P. (2017). Spread and control of weeds of the Xanthium (L.) genus. Quarantine and Plant Protection, 63, 98–103. Retrieved from https://journal.ipp.gov.ua/index.php/qzr/article/view/65
  5. Kochyk, H. M., & Vorona, L. I. (2008). Phytocoenotic control of weeds in agrocenoses of the Polissia zone. Scientific works of the National Scientific Center “Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry of NAAS”, 2, 3–10.
  6. Zabarna, T. A. (2019). Botanical composition of winter wheat crops depending on the effect of the predecessor. Feeds and Feed Production, 88, 71–78. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo201988-10
  7. Pysarenko, V. M., Pishchalenko, M. A., Pospielova, H. D., Horb, O. O., Kovalenko, N. P., & Sherstiuk, O. L. (2020). Integrated plant protection. Poltava: PDAU. Retrieved from https://www.pdau.edu.ua/sites/default/files/academicdepartment/kafedra-zahyst-roslyn/pysarenkov.pdf
  8. Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., & Richardson, D. M. (2011). A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(7), 333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
  9. Blackburn, T. M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P. E., Jeschke, J. M., Kühn, I., & Bacher, S. (2014). A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology, 12(5), e1001850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850
  10. Foxcroft, L. C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Genovesi, P., & MacFadyen, S. (2017). Plant invasion science in protected areas: Progress and priorities. Biological Invasions, 19(5), 1353–1378. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1367-z
  11. Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Hulme, P. E., Pergl, J., Hejda, M., Schaffner, U., & Vilà, M. (2012). A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: The interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biology, 18(5), 1725–1737. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x
  12. Regulation (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 1143/2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_032-14#Text
  13. Abduioieva, O. S., & Karpenko, N. I. (2009). The occurrence of alien invasive plants in the vegetation syntaxa of Ukraine. Black Sea Botanical Journal, 5(2), 189–198. doi: 10.14255/2308-9628/09.52/6
  14. Bahrykova, N. A. (2013). Structural analysis of the adventive fraction of the flora of the Crimean Peninsula (Ukraine). Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 70(4), 489–507. doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj70.04.489
  15. Vykhor, B., & Prots, B. (2014). Invasive plant species of Transcarpathia: Ecological characteristics and dynamic trends of distribution. Biological Studies, 8(1), 171–186. doi: 10.30970/sbi.0801.328
  16. DAISIE. (n.d.). Delivering alien invasive species inventories for Europe. Retrieved from http://www.europe-aliens.org
  17. EASIN. (n.d.). European alien species information network. Retrieved from https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin
  18. EPPO. (2012). EPPO prioritization process for invasive alien plants. EPPO Bulletin, 42(3), 463–474. doi: 10.1111/epp.2602
  19. Wilson, J. R., Panetta, F. D., & Lindgren, C. (2017). Detecting and responding to alien plant incursions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316155318
  20. Foxcroft, L. C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Genovesi, P., & MacFadyen, S. (2017). Plant invasion science in protected areas: Progress and priorities. Biological Invasions, 19(5), 1353–1378. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1367-z
  21. Foxcroft, L. C., Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., & Genovesi, P. (Eds.). (2013). Plant invasions in protected areas: Patterns, problems and challenges. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7750-7
  22. NOBANIS. (2015). Invasive alien species pathway analysis and horizon scanning for countries in Northern Europe. Retrieved from https://www.nobanis.org/globalassets/nobanis-projects/invasive-alien-species-pathway-analysisand-horizon-scanning-for-countries-in-northern-europe.pdf
  23. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text
  24. Dawson, W., Peyton, J. M., Pescott, O. L., Adriaens, T., Cottier-Cook, E. J., Frohlich, D. S., … Roy, H. E. (2023). Horizon scanning for potential invasive non-native species across the United Kingdom Overseas Territories. Conservation Letters, 16(2), e12928. doi: 10.1111/conl.12928
  25. Vaseková, B., Majorošová, M., Belčáková, I., & Slobodník, B. (2022). Distribution and management of Fallopia japonica in riparian biotopes in Slovakia and Austria. Biosystems Diversity, 30(4), 442–452. doi: 10.15421/012244
  26. Follak, S., & Essl, F. (2013). Spread dynamics and agricultural impact of Sorghum halepense, an emerging invasive species in Central Europe. Weed Research, 53(1), 53–60. doi: 10.1111/wre.12000
  27. Skálová, H., Guo, W., Wild, J., & Pyšek, P. (2017). Ambrosia artemisiifolia in the Czech Republic: History of invasion, current distribution and prediction of future spread. Preslia, 89(1), 1–16. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2017.001
  28. Pylypchuk, T. V., Bunas, A. A., Tkach, Ye. D., & Starodub, V. I. (2022). The problem of the spread of Canadian goldenrod Solidago canadensis L. Sustainable development: Environmental protection, energy saving, and balanced land use: Abstracts of the VII International Congress (Lviv, October 12–14, 2022). Lviv.
  29. Vasylieva, T. V., Niemertsalov, V. V., & Kovalenko, S. G. (2019). Ecological features and dynamics of the Asteraceae family in the flora of the city of Odesa over 100 years. Ecological Sciences, 3(26), 99–104.
  30. Bacher, S., Galil, B. S., Nuñez, M. A., Ansong, M., Cassey, P., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., … Ryan-Colton, E. (2023). Impacts of invasive alien species on nature, nature’s contributions to people, and good quality of life. In H. E. Roy, A. Pauchard, P., Stoett, & T. R. Truong (Eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on Invasive Alien Species and their Control (Ch. 4). IPBES.
  31. Chauvel, B., Fried, G., Follak, S., Chapman, D., Kulakova, Y., Le Bourgeois, T., & Regnier, E. (2021). Monographs on invasive plants in Europe No. 5: Ambrosia trifida L. Botany Letters, 168(3), 322–347. doi: 10.1080/23818107.2021.1879674
  32. Buckwell, A., De Wachter, E., Nadeu, E., & Williams, A. (2020). Crop protection & the EU food system. Where are they going? RISE Foundation. Retrieved from https://risefoundation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RISE_CP_EU_final.pdf
  33. Cardarelli, E., Musacchio, A., Montagnani, C., Bogliani, G., Citterio, S., & Gentili, R. (2018). Ambrosia artemisiifolia control in agricultural areas: Effect of grassland seeding and herbivory by the exotic leaf beetle Ophraella communa. NeoBiota, 38, 1–22. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.38.23562
  34. GIDA. (2019). CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Retrieved from https://www.gida-global.org/care
  35. Dzhurenko, N. I., & Koval, I. V. (2018). Adventive species Solidago canadensis L. and its usage possibilities. In Floral and cenotic diversity in the restoration, preservation, and protection of plant life (pp. 23–25). Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u260/materiali_mizhnarodnoyi_naukovo-praktichnoyi_konferenciyi_tezi_dopovidey_23-25.04.2018_ost.pdf
  36. Ivashchenko, O. O. (2014). Ecological control of weeds in wide-row crops. Quarantine and Plant Protection, 3, 6–9. Retrieved from https://kr.ipp.gov.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/45/3-2014-pdf
  37. Burda, R. I. (2006). Phytoinvasions in agroecosystems. In Synanthropization of the plant cover of Ukraine: Abstracts of scientific conference. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi.
  38. Kurdiukova, O. M., & Tyshchuk, O. P. (2015). Soil weed seed bank and measures for its reduction. Quarantine and Plant Protection, 65, 100–110.
  39. Kurdiukova, O. M., & Tyshchuk, O. P. (2017). Ten most common weeds of the Ukrainian steppes and their control. Quarantine and Plant Protection, 7–9, 15–16. Retrieved from https://kr.ipp.gov.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/22/7-9-2017-pdf
  40. Kucher, O. O. (2014). Historical review of the main classifications of adventive plant species. Biological Studies, 8(1), 247–254.
  41. Chuba, M., & Mamchur, Z. (2018). Apophytes and adventive species in the flora of Lviv. Visnyk of Lviv University. Biological Series, 77, 109–118.
  42. Pavlyshak, Ya. Ya., & Dankiv, V. Ya. (2022). Analysis of the adventive fraction of the flora of the Drohobych district. Ecological Sciences, 4(43), 154–157. Retrieved from http://ecoj.dea.kiev.ua/archives/2022/4/25.pdf
  43. Bohoslovska, M. S., Starodub, V. I., & Tkach, Ye. D. (2012). Features of the distribution of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in the phytocoenoses of residential areas of the Vinnytsia region. Scientific Reports of NULES of Ukraine, 7(37).
  44. Mariushkina, V. Ya. (1986). Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and the basics of biological control against it. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  45. Rodinkova, V. V., Mazur, O. I., Slobodianyuk, L. V., & Motruk, I. I. (2012). Analysis of seasonal and daily dynamics of Ambrosia pollen distribution in the air of the Vinnytsia region. Visnyk of Prykarpattia National University named after Vasyl Stefanyk. Biological Series, 17, 49–52.
  46. Neiilyk, M. M., & Tsytsiura, Ya. H. (2020). Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.): Systematics, biology, adaptive potential, and control strategy. Vinnytsia: Druk Plius.

Published

2025-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles