Crisis management of radioactively contaminated territories: socio-economic barriers to recovery in Ukraine’s Polissia region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2025.346190

Keywords:

Chornobyl disaster, Ukrainian Polissia, complex crisis, ecological management, depopulation, human capital, full-scale war

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the socio-economic barriers to the recovery of radioactively contaminated territories in Ukraine’s Polissia region within the framework of crisis ecological management. The study covers the five regions most affected by the Chornobyl nuclear disaster — Volyn, Zhytomyr, Kyiv, Rivne, and Chernihiv oblasts — for the period 2010–2021, with a retrospective analysis of demographic processes since 1991 and an assessment of the impact of the full-scale war that began in 2022. The methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines statistical and correlation analysis, the comparative-geographical method, and dynamic time-series analysis. The information base consists of data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, regional statistical offices, the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, and international organisations. The results reveal a catastrophic demographic crisis, with population decline ranging from 11% to 31% depending on the region, critically high unemployment with pronounced gender differentiation, and a dangerous economic dependence of the population on subsistence farming. Up to 40% of rural households’ income is derived from the sale of products from private plots and forest goods, creating a vicious circle of consumption of potentially contaminated produce. The study also identifies the problem of energy poverty: more than half of rural dwellings are heated with firewood from local forests in the complete absence of legislative standards for radioactive contamination of fuel wood. Correlation analysis established a non-linear relationship between the level of radioactive contamination and socio-economic indicators, with the strongest linkages observed in the most heavily contaminated zones. Four self-reinforcing vicious cycles were identified: poverty — risk, depopulation — degradation, disinvestment, and education — human capital, collectively forming a “depression trap”. The superimposition of the military conflict has created a “triple crisis” situation, dramatically narrowing the scope for managerial solutions. The findings demonstrate that radioactive contamination does not act as a direct cause but rather as a catalyst of socio-economic depression, generating additional barriers to development. The conclusions have practical implications for the design of crisis management strategies and regional policy, emphasising the need for comprehensive rehabilitation programmes supported by large-scale external assistance and systemic structural reforms.

References

  1. United Nations Development Programme, & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2002, January 25). The human consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear accident: A strategy for recovery [Report]. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2002/undp_rus_25jan.pdf
  2. Libanova, E. M. (2014). Demographic shifts in the context of social development. Demography and Social Economy, 1, 9–23.
  3. Baranovskyi, M. O. (2021). Ukrainian Polissia in the post-Soviet period: Development problems, economic transformations, current features. In Ukrainian Polissia: Problems and trends of modern development: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference (pp. 86–89). Nizhyn: NDU im. Hoholia.
  4. Libanova, E. M. (2011). The Chornobyl catastrophe: 25 years later. Demography and Social Economy, 2, 3–18.
  5. Libanova, E. M. (Ed.). (2015). Human development in Ukraine. Modernization of social policy: Regional aspect. Kyiv: Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
  6. Romanchuk, L. D., Dovzhenko, V. A., Fedoniuk, T. P., Borisiuk, L. B., & Lopatiuk, O. V. (2017). In L. D. Romanchuk (Ed.), Assessment of quality of life and radiation safety of rural population of radioactively contaminated territories [Monograph]. Zhytomyr: Hrafium.
  7. Romanchuk, L. D., Herasymchuk, L. O., Kovalyova, S. P., Kovalchuk, Yu. V., & Lopatyuk, O. V. (2019). Quality of life of the population resident at the radioactively contaminated area in Zhytomyr Region. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(4), 478–485.
  8. Kachur, D. P., Zamostian, P. V., Pankovska, H. P., Raichuk, L. A., Kuchma, M. D., & Sviatetska, A. V. (2010). Socio-environmental factors of consumer behavior of the population in radioactively contaminated areas of Polissia. Agroecological Journal [Special issue], 106–110.
  9. Anjum, G., Aziz, M., & Hamid, H. K. (2023). Life and mental health in limbo of the Ukraine war: How can helpers assist civilians, asylum seekers and refugees affected by the war? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1129299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129299
  10. Khrushch, O., Moskalets, V., Fedyk, O., Karpiuk, Y., Hasiuk, M., Ivantsev, N., … Arjjumend, H. (2023). Environmental and psychological effects of Russian war in Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 6(1), 37–84. doi: 10.33002/nr2581.6853.060103
  11. Kurapov, A., Pavlenko, V., Drozdov, A., Bezliudna, V., Reznik, A., & Isralowitz, R. (2023). Toward an understanding of the Russian-Ukrainian war impact on university students and personnel. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 28(2), 167–174. doi:10.1080/15325024.2022.2084838
  12. Hasegawa, A., Ohira, T., Maeda, M., Yasumura, S., & Tanigawa, K. (2016). Emergency responses and health consequences after the Fukushima accident: Evacuation and relocation. Clinical Oncology, 28(4), 237–244. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.002
  13. Murakami, M., Sato, A., Matsui, S., Goto, A., Kumagai, A., Tsubokura, M., … Ochi, S. (2017). Communicating with residents about risks following the Fukushima nuclear accident. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 29(2 Suppl.), 74S–89S. doi: 10.1177/1010539516681841
  14. Smith, J. (2016). The financial costs of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster: A review of the literature [Report]. University of Southern California, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health. Retrieved from https://globalhealth.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016_chernobyl_costs_report.pdf
  15. Danzer, A. M., & Danzer, N. (2016). The long-run consequences of Chernobyl: Evidence on subjective well-being, mental health and welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 135, 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.01.001
  16. Petryna, A. (2013). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl (New and updated ed.). Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  17. Lehmann, H., & Wadsworth, J. (2011). The impact of Chernobyl on health and labour market performance. Journal of Health Economics, 30(5), 843–857. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.011
  18. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2006). Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: Twenty years of experience [Technical Reports Series No. 444]. Vienna: IAEA. Retrieved from https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1239_web.pdf
  19. Smith, J. T., & Beresford, N. A. (2005). Chernobyl: Catastrophe and consequences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/3-540-28079-0
  20. Slovic, P., Flynn, J., & Layman, M. (1991). Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science, 254(5038), 1603–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5038.1603
  21. Vandenhove, H., & Turcanu, С. (2016). Agricultural land management options following the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents: The articulation of science, technology, and society. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 12(4), 662–666. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1826
  22. World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Union, & United Nations. (2024). Ukraine — third rapid damage and needs assessment (RDNA3): February 2022–December 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099021324115085807/P1801741bea12c012189ca16d95d8c2556a
  23. Nikolaiev, Ye., Rii, H., & Shemelynets, I. (2023). Higher education in Ukraine: Changes due to the war. Kyiv: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University.
  24. Quarantelli, E. L. (1988). Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 373–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00043.x
  25. Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59–76. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.192960
  26. Official website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
  27. Official website of the Main Department of Statistics in Volyn Region. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.lutsk.ukrstat.gov.ua
  28. Official website of the Main Department of Statistics in Zhytomyr Region. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.zt.ukrstat.gov.ua
  29. Official website of the Main Department of Statistics in Kyiv Region. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://kyivobl.ukrstat.gov.ua
  30. Official website of the Main Department of Statistics in Rivne Region. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.gusrv.gov.ua
  31. Official website of the Main Department of Statistics in Chernihiv Region. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.chernigivstat.gov.ua
  32. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (n.d.). Register of educational activity entities. Unified State Electronic Database on Education. Retrieved from https://registry.edbo.gov.ua
  33. Institute of Geography, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (2024). Contamination of territory with cesium-137 (consequence of the accident at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant, 1986). National Atlas of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://wdc.org.ua/atlas/7030100.html

Downloads

Published

2025-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles