Topography and reconstruction of historical mines of the Kagarlinsk mining-metallurgical center (Bronze Age)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.v43i2.230192Abstract
Kagarlinsk copper deposits have been worked out since IV millennium BC and till the end of II millennium BC in the steppes of the South Urals and a huge amount of copper have been recovered from their ores in the Bronze Age. Geophysical studies have been conducted in the south periphery of the Kagarlinsk ore field not far from Belousovka village at the mining-processing complex with the length of 900—1000 m and 30—70 m size across. Something like a hundred of small open-cut mines from 3 to 12 m in diameter are fixed in this area with near side mine dumps, sites for assortment of extracted ore adjoined at stove pits 3—5 m in diameter for burning up lump ores. Thorough topographic, gradient magnetic and geo-radar surveys have been fulfilled in areas where typical objects: open-cut mine, a pit for pilot burning up ores, slime sites and ore store are situated. As a result new data have been obtained on the structure of ancient outputs and associated technological facilities. Numerous magnetic anomalies revealed near the open-cut mine and a pit testify that copper ore encloses sufficient amount of iron and pilot assortment of the burned up ore took place near the pits. According to the results of geo-radar survey special features of pit-stove have been reconstructed and 3D model of the ancient open-cut mine built. A pit for burning up ore was cone-shaped with steps for comfort of loading and unloading ore. Its bottom diameter was 5m, the principal mine was 1—1.5 m in diameter and depth rough 3 m, the volume of the pit did not exceed 13—15 m3. Transversal size of a mine was 7—9 m and the depth was up to 4 m. The open-cut mine had steep sides from the north, east and south and in the west the relief was mildly sloping. The entrance to the open-cut mine was from the west. Initial depth of the open-cut mine differed from the present day surface by 2—3 m. According to our appraisal the amount of extracted ore in this mine was 25—30 tons. Taking into account the overall number of mines some 2—2.5 thousand tons of bulk ore were extracted during operation of Belousovka mining-metallurgical complex.
References
Ankushev, M.N., Yuminov, A.M., Zaikov, V.V., & Noskevich, V.V. (2018). Copper mines of Bronze Age in Southern Trans-Urals. Izves-tiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Geoarkheologiya. Etnologiya. Antropologiya, 23, 87-110. https://doi.org/10.26 516/2227-2380.2018.23.87 (in Russian).
Blinov, I.A. (2020). Chemical and mineral composition of sulfide nodules from the Mikhaylovsky and Belousovsky ancient mines, Orenburg Gis-Urals. Mineralogiya, (6), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.35597/2313-545X-2020-6-4-2 (in Russian).
Bogdanov, S.V. (2019). Technologies of mining and metallurgical production of the early metal era of Northern Eurasia from the standpoint of experimental archeology. In Phenomena of cultures of the Early Bronze Age of the steppe and forest-steppe zone of Eurasia: ways of cul-tural interaction in the 5th-3rd millennium BC (pp. 161-174). Orenburg: Publ. house of the OGPU (in Russian).
Bogdanov, S.V. (2020).Technological algorithms of the pastoral model of metal production in the steppe regions of North Eurasia in the Bronze Age. Uralskiy istoricheskiy vestnik, (4), 6-14 (in Russian).
Bogdanov, S.V., Tkachev, V.V., Yuminov, A.M., & Avramenko, S.V. (2018). Geoarchaeological system of historical copper mines of the Priuralsky (Kargalinsky) steppe mining and metallurgical center. Geoarkheologiya i arkheologicheskaya mineralogiya, 5, 121-133 (in Russian).
Bondar, K.M., Khomenko, R.V., Chernov, A.P., & Kuksa, N.V. (2020). Results of the ground penetrating radar survey in the church of St. Elias - Bohdan Khmelnytsky burial vault in Subbotov. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 42(3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v42i3.2020.204709 (in Russian).
Zhurbin, I.V. (2004). Geophysics in archeology: methods, technology and application results. Izhevsk: Ed. Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature, Ural Branch of RAS, 152 p. (in Russian).
Lepekhin, I.I. (1772). Day notes of the journey of the doctor and the Academy of Sciences of the adjunct Ivan Lepekhin to different provinces of the Russian state in 1770. St. Petersburg: Printing house of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, 359 p. (in Russian).
Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., Tkachev, V.V., Baytleu, D.A., & Yuminov, A.M. (2017). Reconstruction of ancient quarries copper Bronze Age by GPR data. Geofizika, (1), 56-62 (in Russian).
Noskevich, V.V., & Fedorova, N.V. (2018). Using the ground penetrating radar method for research of the ancient «Vorovskaya Yama» copper mine in the South Urals. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta, (4), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2018-4-61-67 (in Russian).
Rychkov, N.P. (1770). Journal or Day Notes of Captain Rychkov’s voyage to different provinces of the Russian state in 1769 and 1770. Petersburg: Printing house of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, 220 p. (in Russian).
Starovoytov, A.V. (2008). Interpretation of GPR data. Moscow: Publ. house of Moscow University, 192 p. (in Russian).
Chernykh, E.N. (Ed.). (2002). Kargaly. Vol. I. Geological and geographical characteristics History of discoveries, exploitation and investigations Archaeological sites. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic culture, 112 p. (in Russian).
Chernykh, E.N. (Ed.). (2007). Кargaly. Vol. V. Phenomenon and paradoxes of development Kargaly in the systems of metallurgical provinces hidden (sacral) lifе of archaic miners and metallurgists. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic culture, 200 p. (in Russian).
Chernykh, E.N. (2005). Ways and models of development of archaeometallurgy in the Old and New World. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya, (4), 49-60 (in Russian).
Yuminov, A.M., Bogdanov, S.V., Tkachev, V.V., Avramenko, S.V., & Manbetova, G.R. (2017). Geochemical characteristics of ores of historical copper mines in the steppe Urals. Geoarkheologiya i arkheologicheskaya mineralogiya, 4, 118-123 (in Russian).
Berseneva, N.A., Epimakhov, A.V., Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V. & Tkachev, V.V. (2016). Reconstruction of the Ancient Bronze Age Copper Quarries Using GPR. 23nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface Geoscience: Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-4).
Conyers, L.B. (2016). Ground-penetrating Radar for Geoarchaeology. Analytical Methods in Earth and Environmental Science. New York: Wiley Publ., 160 р.
Goodman, D., & Piro, S. (2013). GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology. Springer, 233 p.
GSSI-RADAN-7 Manual. (2017). Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Nashua, NH, USA. Retrieved from https://www.geophysical.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/GSSI-RADAN-7-Manual.pdf.
Elsayed, I.S., Alhussein, A.B., Gad, E., & Mahfuuz, A.H. (2014). Shallow seismic refraction, two-dimensional electrical resistivity imaging, and ground penetrating radar for imaging the ancient monuments at the western shore of old Luxor city, Egypt. Archaeological Discovery, 2(2), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2014.22005.
Noskewich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., & Yuminov, A.M. (2019). Application of GPR for the reconstruction of the copper mine of the Bronze in the Southern Trans-Ural of Russia. 25nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface Geoscience: Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-5). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902372.
Yuminov, A.M., Blinov, I.A., & Guzairova, A.E. (2019). Mineral Composition of Ores and Primary Processing Products of the Ancient Mikhailovsky Mine (Central Orenburg Region). Geoarchaeology and Archaeological Mineralogy (pp. 90-95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.007/978-3-030-48864-2_13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
